5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of primary root canals transportation and dentin loss after instrumentation with two-pediatric rotary files

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This in vitro study aims to compare rotary files (Fanta and Zuanba) with manual K files according to the amount of dentin removed and canal transportation in primary mandibular second molars by CBCT images.

          Methods

          This experimental study was conducted on 60 extracted human second primary molars. That were divided into three groups according to root canal preparation group "I" instrumented with manual K-files, group "II" instrumented with rotary Fanta files, and group "III" instrumented with rotary Zuanba files. After root canal preparation, teeth were scanned before and after mechanical preparation with CBCT scanner. Then the amount of dentin removed was determined at three levels, including the coronal, middle and apical levels. Data were statically analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test.

          Result

          No statistically significant difference in the amount of dentin removed were noted between the manual and the rotary groups at the coronal and apical RC levels (P = 0.420) and (P = 0.819) respectively but significant difference was noted at the middle third (P = 0.043). Regarding RC transportation, no significant difference was noted among the three groups with the exception of the apical RC level (P = 0.043).

          Conclusion

          Although no significant differences were noted between rotary and manual files, the rotary files showed better performance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography.

            Computed tomography was used to evaluate root canals prepared by nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) hand and stainless steel hand endodontic instruments. Thirty-six single-rooted teeth of similar shape and canal size were divided into three groups. The teeth were scanned by computed tomography before instrumentation. In group A, canals were instrumented using a quarter turn/pull technique with K-flex files. In group B, canals were prepared with Ni-Ti hand files (Mity files) using the same technique as group A. Group C was prepared with Ni-Ti hand files (Mity files) using a reaming technique. Instrumented teeth were again scanned using computed tomography, and reformated images of the uninstrumented canals were compared with images of the instrumented canals. Ni-Ti instruments (Mity file) used in a reaming technique caused significantly less canal transportation (p < 0.05), removed significantly less volume of dentin (p < 0.05), required less instrumentation time (p < 0.05), and produced more centered and rounder canal preparations than K-flex stainless steel files used in a quarter turn/pull technique. The computed tomography imaging system used in this study provided a repeatable, noninvasive method of evaluating certain aspects of endodontic instrumentation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings--2003.

              This report consolidates previous recommendations and adds new ones for infection control in dental settings. Recommendations are provided regarding 1) educating and protecting dental health-care personnel; 2) preventing transmission of bloodborne pathogens; 3) hand hygiene; 4) personal protective equipment; 5) contact dermatitis and latex hypersensitivity; 6) sterilization and disinfection of patient-care items; 7) environmental infection control; 8) dental unit waterlines, biofilm, and water quality; and 9) special considerations (e.g., dental handpieces and other devices, radiology, parenteral medications, oral surgical procedures, and dental laboratories). These recommendations were developed in collaboration with and after review by authorities on infection control from CDC and other public agencies, academia, and private and professional organizations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yasmina.mortada@aun.edu.eg
                dr_khattabn@yahoo.com
                yaserfh@mu.edu.eg
                ahmedelheeny@mu.edu.eg
                Journal
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BMC Oral Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6831
                31 May 2022
                31 May 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 214
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.252487.e, ISNI 0000 0000 8632 679X, Faculty of Dentistry, , Assiut University, ; Assiut, Egypt
                [2 ]GRID grid.7269.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0621 1570, Faculty of Dentistry, , Ain Shams University, ; Cairo, Egypt
                [3 ]GRID grid.411806.a, ISNI 0000 0000 8999 4945, Faculty of Dentistry, , Minia University, ; El Minia, 61519 Egypt
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-0198
                Article
                2245
                10.1186/s12903-022-02245-8
                9153195
                35641977
                c40c6ab5-6b41-499b-a8f3-9ae226645b7c
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 20 January 2022
                : 18 May 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Dentistry
                child,root canal,cone-beam computed tomography,nitinol
                Dentistry
                child, root canal, cone-beam computed tomography, nitinol

                Comments

                Comment on this article