3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contemporary clinical updates on the prevention of future cardiovascular disease in women who experience adverse pregnancy outcomes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adverse pregnancy outcomes including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes are significant causes of maternal mortality. There is substantial evidence of an association between adverse events during pregnancy and long‐term maternal cardiovascular risk. It is therefore important to understand the role of risk modification prior to, during, and after pregnancy to reduce adverse outcomes. These efforts include risk assessment, routine screening for cardiovascular risk factors, and potential pharmacotherapeutic risk reduction. In this manuscript, we aim to highlight the current evidence in the areas of cardiovascular risk assessment and risk modification, and the role for potential risk reduction therapies before, during, and after pregnancy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians.

          To establish normal reference ranges during pregnancy for common laboratory analytes. We conducted a comprehensive electronic database review using PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. We also reviewed textbooks of maternal laboratory studies during uncomplicated pregnancy. We searched the databases for studies investigating various laboratory analytes at various times during pregnancy. All abstracts were examined by two investigators and, if they were found relevant, the full text of the article was reviewed. Articles were included if the analyte studied was measured in pregnant women without major medical problems or confounding conditions and if the laboratory marker was measured and reported for a specified gestational age. For each laboratory marker, data were extracted from as many references as possible, and these data were combined to establish normal reference ranges in pregnancy. When possible, the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles were reported as the normal range. In some of the reference articles, however, the reported range was based on the minimum and maximum value of the laboratory constituent. In those cases, the minimum to maximum range was used and combined with the 2.5 and 97.5 percentile range. We found that there is a substantial difference in normal values in some laboratory markers in the pregnant state when compared with the nonpregnant state. It is important to consider normal reference ranges specific to pregnancy when interpreting some laboratory results that may be altered by the normal changes of pregnancy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pregnancy: a "teachable moment" for weight control and obesity prevention.

            Excessive gestational weight gain has been shown to relate to high-postpartum weight retention and the development of overweight and obesity later in life. Because many women are concerned about the health of their babies during pregnancy and are in frequent contact with their healthcare providers, pregnancy may be an especially powerful "teachable moment" for the promotion of healthy eating and physical activity behaviors among women. Initial research suggests that helping women gain the recommended amount during pregnancy through healthy eating and physical activity could make a major contribution to the prevention of postpartum weight retention. However, more randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to identify the most effective and disseminable intervention. Providers have the potential to prevent high postpartum weight retention and future obesity by monitoring weight gain during pregnancy and giving appropriate advice about recommended amounts of gestational weight gain. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Why is placentation abnormal in preeclampsia?

              The causes of preeclampsia remain one of the great medical mysteries of our time. This syndrome is thought to occur in 2 stages with abnormal placentation leading to a maternal inflammatory response. Specific regions of the placenta have distinct pathologic features. During normal pregnancy, cytotrophoblasts emigrate from the chorionic villi and invade the uterus, reaching the inner third of the myometrium. This unusual process is made even more exceptional by the fact that the placental cells are hemiallogeneic, coexpressing maternal and paternal genomes. Within the uterine wall, cytotrophoblasts deeply invade the spiral arteries. Cytotrophoblasts migrate up these vessels and replace, in a retrograde fashion, the maternal endothelial lining. They also insert themselves among the smooth muscle cells that form the tunica media. As a result, the spiral arteries attain the physiologic properties that are required to perfuse the placenta adequately. In comparison, invasion of the venous side of the uterine circulation is minimal, sufficient to enable venous return. In preeclampsia, cytotrophoblast invasion of the interstitial uterine compartment is frequently shallow, although not consistently so. In many locations, spiral artery invasion is incomplete. There are many fewer endovascular cytotrophoblasts, and some vessels retain portions of their endothelial lining with relatively intact muscular coats, although others are not modified. Work from our group showed that these defects mirror deficits in the differentiation program that enables cytotrophoblast invasion of the uterine wall. During normal pregnancy, invasion is accompanied by the down-regulation of epithelial-like molecules that are indicative of their ectodermal origin and up-regulation of numerous receptors and ligands that typically are expressed by endothelial or vascular smooth muscle cells. For example, the expression of epithelial-cadherin (the cell-cell adhesion molecule that many ectodermal derivatives use to adhere to one another) becomes nearly undetectable, replaced by vascular-endothelial cadherin, which serves the same purpose in blood vessels. Invading cytotrophoblasts also modulate vascular endothelial growth factor ligands and receptors, at some point in the differentiation process expressing every (mammalian) family member. Molecules in this family play crucial roles in vascular and trophoblast biology, including the prevention of apoptosis. In preeclampsia, this process of vascular mimicry is incomplete, which we theorize hinders the cells interactions with spiral arterioles. What causes these aberrations? Given what is known from animal models and human risk factors, reduced placental perfusion and/or certain disease states (metabolic, immune and cardiovascular) lie upstream. Recent evidence suggests the surprising conclusion that isolation and culture of cytotrophoblasts from the placentas of pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia enables normalization of their gene expression. The affected molecules include SEMA3B, which down-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor signaling through the PI3K/AKT and GSK3 pathways. Thus, some aspects of the aberrant differentiation of cytotrophoblasts within the uterine wall that is observed in situ may be reversible. The next challenge is asking what the instigating causes are. There is added urgency to finding the answers, because these pathways could be valuable therapeutic targets for reversing abnormal placental function in patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ki.park@medicine.ufl.edu
                Journal
                Clin Cardiol
                Clin Cardiol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1932-8737
                CLC
                Clinical Cardiology
                Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (New York )
                0160-9289
                1932-8737
                17 April 2020
                June 2020
                : 43
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/clc.v43.6 )
                : 553-559
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
                [ 2 ] Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ki Park, MD, MS, FACC, Division of Cardiology, University of Florida, 1329 SW 16 Street, P.O. Box 100288, Gainesville, FL 32610‐0288.

                Email: ki.park@ 123456medicine.ufl.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9943-3484
                Article
                CLC23374
                10.1002/clc.23374
                7298992
                32304143
                c0b023c7-7b97-427d-9cbe-7b44a74876c4
                © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 February 2020
                : 26 March 2020
                : 06 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Pages: 7, Words: 6082
                Funding
                Funded by: Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center
                Funded by: Brawerman Nursing Institute, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center
                Funded by: Department of Nursing Research, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center
                Funded by: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100006108;
                Award ID: UL1TR000124
                Award ID: UL1TR001881‐01
                Funded by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000050;
                Award ID: F31NR015725
                Funded by: Precision Health Institute, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center
                Award ID: #42254
                Funded by: Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association through the American Nurses Foundation
                Award ID: #5362
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:17.06.2020

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                adverse pregnancy outcomes,cardiovascular risk,women
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                adverse pregnancy outcomes, cardiovascular risk, women

                Comments

                Comment on this article