34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Dapagliflozin on Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction : A Participant-Level Pooled Analysis of DAPA-HF and DELIVER

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This pooled analysis of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) and Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure (DELIVER) trials investigates the effect of dapagliflozin on specific causes of cardiovascular mortality across the spectrum of ejection fraction.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is the effect of dapagliflozin on cardiovascular (CV) mortality driven by effects on particular causes of CV death?

          Findings

          In this pooled analysis of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA-HF) and Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure (DELIVER) trials including 1628 patient deaths, treatment with dapagliflozin led to a 14% lower risk of CV death regardless of ejection fraction, principally due to lower rates of sudden death and HF death, with little difference in rates of death from stroke or MI.

          Meaning

          Regardless of ejection fraction, dapagliflozin-associated reductions in CV mortality in patients with HF are principally due to lower rates of HF and sudden death.

          Abstract

          Importance

          In 2 trials enrolling patients with heart failure (HF) across the spectrum of ejection fraction (EF), dapagliflozin has been shown to reduce the rate of the composite of worsening HF events or death from cardiovascular (CV) causes.

          Objective

          To examine the effects of dapagliflozin on cause-specific CV and non-CV mortality across the spectrum of EF.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This was a participant-level, pooled, prespecified secondary analysis of data from the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure, or DAPA-HF trial (participant left ventricular EF [LVEF] ≤40%), and Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure, or DELIVER trial (participant LVEF >40%), to assess the effects of randomized treatment on cause-specific mortality. The trials assigned adjacent populations of patients with chronic HF, New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptides to treatment with dapagliflozin (10 mg, once daily) or placebo. The primary outcome for each study was a composite of worsening HF events (hospitalization or urgent heart failure visits) or CV death. Clinical outcomes, including all deaths, were adjudicated as to cause by clinical end points committees blinded to treatment assignment.

          Intervention

          Dapagliflozin vs placebo.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The mode of death in relation to baseline EF was examined, as well as the effect of randomized treatment on cause-specific death in Cox regression models. Relationships with continuous EF were modeled using Poisson regression.

          Results

          Of 11 007 patients in the pooled data set, there were 1628 deaths during follow-up (mean [SD] age, 71.7 [10.3] years; 1139 male [70.0%]). Of those who died, 872 (53.5%) were ascribed to CV deaths, 487 (29.9%) to non-CV deaths, and 269 (16.5%) to undetermined causes. Of CV deaths, 289 (33.1%; this represented 17.8% of total deaths) were due to HF, 441 (50.6%; 27.1% of total deaths) were sudden, 69 (7.9%; 4.2% of total deaths) were due to stroke, 47 (5.4%; 2.9% of total deaths) to myocardial infarction, and 26 (3.0%; 1.6% of total deaths) were due to other CV causes. The proportion of non-CV deaths was higher in those with higher EF. In the pooled population, across the spectrum of EF, treatment with dapagliflozin was associated with lower rates of CV death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .02), principally due to lower rates of sudden death (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-1.01; P = .07) and HF death (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.11; P = .30), with little difference in rates of death from stroke or MI.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In a pooled analysis of patients with HF in the DAPA-HF and DELIVER randomized clinical trials, across the full spectrum of LVEF, dapagliflozin significantly reduced risks of CV death with contributions from lower rates of sudden death and death from progressive HF.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03036124, NCT03619213

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

          In patients with type 2 diabetes, inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) reduce the risk of a first hospitalization for heart failure, possibly through glucose-independent mechanisms. More data are needed regarding the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction, regardless of the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction

            Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death among patients with chronic heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less. Whether SGLT2 inhibitors are effective in patients with a higher left ventricular ejection fraction remains less certain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of the angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 compared with enalapril on mode of death in heart failure patients.

              The angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) LCZ696 reduced cardiovascular deaths and all-cause mortality compared with enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure in the prospective comparison of ARNI with an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial. To more completely understand the components of this mortality benefit, we examined the effect of LCZ696 on mode of death.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Cardiol
                JAMA Cardiol
                JAMA Cardiology
                American Medical Association
                2380-6583
                2380-6591
                3 October 2022
                December 2022
                3 October 2022
                : 7
                : 12
                : 1227-1234
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Renal Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: September 6, 2022.
                Published Online: October 3, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3736
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2022 Desai AS et al. JAMA Cardiology.
                Corresponding Author: Akshay S. Desai, MD, MPH, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 ( adesai@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Desai had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Desai, Barkoudah, Petrie, Solomon.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Desai, Jhund, Claggett, Vaduganathan, Miao, Kondo, Barkoudah, Brahimi, Connolly, Finn, Lang, Mc Causland, McGrath, McMurray, Solomon.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Desai, Claggett, Kondo, Barkoudah.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Desai, Jhund, Vaduganathan, Miao, Barkoudah, Brahimi, Connolly, Finn, Lang, Mc Causland, McGrath, Petrie, McMurray, Solomon.
                Statistical analysis: Jhund, Claggett, Miao, Kondo.
                Obtained funding: Solomon.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Miao, Barkoudah.
                Supervision: Desai, Petrie, Solomon.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Desai reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Alnylam, Bayer, and Novartis; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Alnylam, Amgen, Bayer, Biofourmis, Cytokinetics, GlaxoSmithKline, Medpace, Merck, Novartis, Parexel, Roche, Regeneron, Verily, Axon Therapeutics, Avidity, and New Amsterdam; and fees for data-safety monitoring board participant from Boston Scientific. Dr Jhund reported receiving received consulting, advisory board, and speaker fees from Novartis; advisory board fees from Cytogenetics; a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim; grant support from AstraZeneca and Novartis; advisory board fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and fees for clinical trial work from Novo Nordisk and Bayer outside the submitted work. Dr Claggett reported receiving consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardurion, Corvia, and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Vaduganathan reported receiving grant support or advisory board fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, American Regent, Baxter HealthCare, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Pharmacosmos, Relypsa, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Galmed, Occlutech, Impulse Dynamics, Sanofi, and Tricog Health; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics; and actively participates on clinical trial committees for studies sponsored by Galmed, Novartis, Bayer AG, Occlutech, and Impulse Dynamics outside the submitted work. Dr Kondo reported receiving lecture fees from Abbott Medical Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Novartis Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Abiomed Japan outside the submitted work. Dr Barkoudah reported receiving grants from Brigham and Women's Hospital, the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; personal fees from WebMD, Medscape, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer; and travel expenses from Alexion outside the submitted work. Dr Connolly reported receiving fees from University of Glasgow during the conduct of the study. Dr Lang reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche and speaker/advisory fees from MyoKardia, Roche Pharma, Pharmacosmos, Astra Zeneca, Akero, and Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Mc Causland reported receiving consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees from Advanced Instruments; and grants from Fifth Eye, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Satellite Healthcare, and Advanced Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Petrie reported receiving personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Siemens, Takeda, New Amsterdam, Abbvie, Bayer, Cardiorentis, Vifor, Alnylam, Novartis, and Pharmacosmos; grants from Pharmacosmos, NovoNordisk, SQ Innovations, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Vifor, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Novartis; and research support from the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence Award. Dr McMurray reported receiving consultant fees or grant support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardurion, Amgen, Cytokinetics, Servier, Theracos, Dalcor, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Alnylam, Novartis; personal fees from Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, Corpus, Eris Lifesciences, Hikma, Lupin, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Servier, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Cardurion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Medsca; and research support from the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence Award outside the submitted work. Dr Solomon reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca, Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Neurotronik, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos; and consultant fees from Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, Puretech Health outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: The DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials were sponsored by AstraZeneca. In addition, this work was supported by grant RE/18/6/34217 from the British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence (Drs Jhund and McMurray) and the Vera Melrose Heart Failure Research Fund.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The DAPA-HF and DELIVER studies were designed by the academic members of the respective executive committees in collaboration with representatives from AstraZeneca. The sponsor, AstraZeneca, was responsible for study supervision, site monitoring, and data collection for both trials. Data analysis of each trial was performed by AstraZeneca and independent academic statisticians at the University of Glasgow and the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston. This prespecified secondary analysis was conducted by an independent academic group at Brigham and Women's Hospital. All authors participated in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication with support from the study sponsor.
                Meeting Presentation: This paper was presented at the HFSA Annual Scientific Meeting 2022; October 3, 2022; Washington, DC.
                Article
                hoi220064 hoi220064
                10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3736
                9531084
                36189985
                bffa449e-7edb-4db2-95b6-6e1ac7a0fbb3
                Copyright 2022 Desai AS et al. JAMA Cardiology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 6 September 2022
                : 6 September 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: AstraZeneca
                Funded by: British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence
                Funded by: Vera Melrose Heart Failure Research Fund
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article