4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of machine learning models for predicting TiO 2 photocatalytic degradation of air contaminants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The escalation of global urbanization and industrial expansion has resulted in an increase in the emission of harmful substances into the atmosphere. Evaluating the effectiveness of titanium dioxide (TiO 2) in photocatalytic degradation through traditional methods is resource-intensive and complex due to the detailed photocatalyst structures and the wide range of contaminants. Therefore in this study, recent advancements in machine learning (ML) are used to offer data-driven approach using thirteen machine learning techniques namely XG Boost (XGB), decision tree (DT), lasso Regression (LR2), support vector regression (SVR), adaBoost (AB), voting Regressor (VR), CatBoost (CB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), gradient boost (GB), random Forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), ridge regression (RR), linear regression (LR1) to address the problem of estimation of TiO 2 photocatalytic degradation rate of air contaminants. The models are developed using literature data and different methodical tools are used to evaluate the developed ML models. XGB, DT and LR2 models have high R 2 values of 0.93, 0.926 and 0.926 in training and 0.936, 0.924 and 0.924 in test phase. While ANN, RR and LR models have lowest R 2 values of 0.70, 0.56 and 0.40 in training and 0.62, 0.63 and 0.31 in test phase respectively. XGB, DT and LR2 have low MAE and RMSE values of 0.450 min -1/cm 2, 0.494 min -1/cm 2 and 0.49 min -1/cm 2 for RMSE and 0.263 min -1/cm 2, 0.285 min -1/cm 2 and 0.29 min -1/cm 2 for MAE in test stage. XGB, DT, and LR2 have 93% percent errors within 20% error range in training phase. XGB has 92% and DT, and LR2 have 94% errors with 20% range in test phase. XGB, DT, LR2 models remained the highest performing models and XGB is the most robust and effective in predictions. Feature importances reveal the role of input parameters in prediction made by developed ML models. Dosage, humidity, UV light intensity remain important experimental factors. This study will impact positively in providing efficient models to estimate photocatalytic degradation rate of air contaminants using TiO 2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bagging predictors

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                arbabfaisal@cuiatd.edu.pk
                taoufik.najeh@ltu.se
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                13 June 2024
                13 June 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 13688
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Civil Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, ( https://ror.org/01sb6ek09) Topi, Pakistan
                [2 ]Western Caspian University, ( https://ror.org/05cgtjz78) Baku, Azerbaijan
                [3 ]COMSATS University Islamabad, ( https://ror.org/00nqqvk19) Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan
                [4 ]Department of Civil Engineering, Nazarbayev University, ( https://ror.org/052bx8q98) Astana, Kazakhstan
                [5 ]Operation and Maintenance, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, ( https://ror.org/016st3p78) Luleå, Sweden
                [6 ]Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, ( https://ror.org/04jt46d36) 11942 Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
                [7 ]Department of Transport Systems, Traffic Engineering and Logistics, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, ( https://ror.org/02dyjk442) Krasińskiego 8 Street, 40-019 Katowice, Poland
                [8 ]GRID grid.412117.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2234 2376, National Institute of Transportation, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), ; Islamabad, Pakistan
                Article
                64486
                10.1038/s41598-024-64486-7
                11176179
                38871797
                bf5f1176-2613-4fbc-bf4e-7a2bd167ee1c
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 February 2024
                : 10 June 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Lulea University of Technology
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                tio2,photocatalytic degradation,air contaminants,machine learning,civil engineering,environmental impact

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content195

                Most referenced authors1,354