15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Dissociable Components of Error Processing : On the Functional Significance of the Pe Vis-à-vis the ERN/Ne

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract: We conducted a literature review to examine the functional significance of the error positivity (Pe), an error-related electrophysiological brain potential often observed in combination with the error negativity (Ne). The review revealed many dissociations between documented effects on the Ne and Pe, suggesting that these components reflect different aspects of error processing. We found little support for the proposed hypotheses that the Pe is associated with the affective processing of errors or with posterror behavioral adaptation. Some support was found for the hypothesis that the Pe reflects conscious recognition of an error. Finally, we discuss the notion that the Pe may reflect a P3b associated with the motivational significance of the error. We conclude that more research is needed to test predictions of the various Pe hypotheses, and that more rigorous investigation of the neural generators of the Pe may contribute to a better understanding of the neurocognitive processes involved in error monitoring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

          A neglected question regarding cognitive control is how control processes might detect situations calling for their involvement. The authors propose here that the demand for control may be evaluated in part by monitoring for conflicts in information processing. This hypothesis is supported by data concerning the anterior cingulate cortex, a brain area involved in cognitive control, which also appears to respond to the occurrence of conflict. The present article reports two computational modeling studies, serving to articulate the conflict monitoring hypothesis and examine its implications. The first study tests the sufficiency of the hypothesis to account for brain activation data, applying a measure of conflict to existing models of tasks shown to engage the anterior cingulate. The second study implements a feedback loop connecting conflict monitoring to cognitive control, using this to simulate a number of important behavioral phenomena.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

            The authors present a unified account of 2 neural systems concerned with the development and expression of adaptive behaviors: a mesencephalic dopamine system for reinforcement learning and a "generic" error-processing system associated with the anterior cingulate cortex. The existence of the error-processing system has been inferred from the error-related negativity (ERN), a component of the event-related brain potential elicited when human participants commit errors in reaction-time tasks. The authors propose that the ERN is generated when a negative reinforcement learning signal is conveyed to the anterior cingulate cortex via the mesencephalic dopamine system and that this signal is used by the anterior cingulate cortex to modify performance on the task at hand. They provide support for this proposal using both computational modeling and psychophysiological experimentation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

              Recent neurophysiological studies reveal that neurons in certain brain structures carry specific signals about past and future rewards. Dopamine neurons display a short-latency, phasic reward signal indicating the difference between actual and predicted rewards. The signal is useful for enhancing neuronal processing and learning behavioral reactions. It is distinctly different from dopamine's tonic enabling of numerous behavioral processes. Neurons in the striatum, frontal cortex, and amygdala also process reward information but provide more differentiated information for identifying and anticipating rewards and organizing goal-directed behavior. The different reward signals have complementary functions, and the optimal use of rewards in voluntary behavior would benefit from interactions between the signals. Addictive psychostimulant drugs may exert their action by amplifying the dopamine reward signal.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jop
                Journal of Psychophysiology
                An International Journal
                Hogrefe Publishing
                0269-8803
                January 2005
                : 19
                : 4
                : 319-329
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Department of Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Ridderinkhof Richard, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roeterstraat 15, NL-1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, +31 20 525-6119, +31 20 639-0279, k.r.ridderinkhof@ 123456uva.nl
                Article
                jop1904319
                10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.319
                bf17b2e3-13f9-42fe-9908-03694857d42d
                Copyright @ 2005
                History
                : 20 July 2005
                Categories
                Articles

                Psychology,Anatomy & Physiology,Neurosciences
                error processing,error positivity,error negativity,error awareness,performance monitoring

                Comments

                Comment on this article