Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pharmacometric Analysis of Intranasal and Intravenous Nalbuphine to Optimize Pain Management in Infants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The objective of this pharmacometric (PMX) study was to (i) characterize population pharmacokinetics (PPK) and exposure-pain response associations following intranasal (0.1 mg/kg) or intravenous (IV, 0.05 mg/kg) administration of nalbuphine, with the goal to (ii) evaluate strategies for optimized dosing and timing of painful interventions in infants 1–3 months old.

          Methods

          PPK analysis of nalbuphine serum concentrations, prospectively collected 15, 30, and between 120 and 180 min post-dose, utilizing the software package Monolix. The final PPK model was applied to derive individual time-matched concentration predictions for each pain assessment (Neonatal Infant Pain Score, NIPS) after establishment of venous access and urinary catheterization or lumbar puncture. Drug exposure-pain response simulations were performed to evaluate potential benefits of higher doses with respect to a previously proposed target concentration of 12 mcg/L (efficacy threshold).

          Results

          Thirty-eight of 52 study subjects receiving nalbuphine had at least one concentration measurement and were included in the pharmacometric analysis. A two-compartment model with allometric scaling was applied to describe population PK data, with intranasal bioavailability estimated to be 41% (95%CI: 26–56%). Model-based simulations showed that the proposed efficacy threshold (12 mcg/L) is expected to be exceeded with an IV dose of 0.05 mg/kg for 6 min, with 0.1 mg/kg for 30 min and with 0.2 mg/kg for 80 min. This efficacy threshold is not achieved with intranasal doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg, whereas an intranasal dose of 0.4 mg/kg is expected to exceed such threshold for 30 to 100 min.

          Conclusion

          This PMX study confirmed that bioavailability of intranasal nalbuphine is close to 50%. Exposure-pain response simulations indicated that an intranasal dose of 0.4 mg/kg is required to provide a comparable pain control as achieved with an IV dose of 0.1–0.2 mg/kg. The optimal time window for painful procedures appears to be within the first 30 min after IV administration of 0.1 mg/kg nalbuphine, whereas such procedures should be scheduled 30 min after an intranasal dose of 0.4 mg/kg nalbuphine. Additional clinical studies are warranted to confirm these PMX based recommendations and to further optimize pain management in this vulnerable infant population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intranasal drug delivery: an efficient and non-invasive route for systemic administration: focus on opioids.

          Intranasal administration is a non-invasive route for drug delivery, which is widely used for the local treatment of rhinitis or nasal polyposis. Since drugs can be absorbed into the systemic circulation through the nasal mucosa, this route may also be used in a range of acute or chronic conditions requiring considerable systemic exposure. Indeed, it offers advantages such as ease of administration, rapid onset of action, and avoidance of first-pass metabolism, which consequently offers for example an interesting alternative to intravenous, subcutaneous, oral transmucosal, oral or rectal administration in the management of pain with opioids. Given these indisputable interests, fentanyl-containing formulations have been recently approved and marketed for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain. This review will outline the relevant aspects of the therapeutic interest and limits of intranasal delivery of drugs, with a special focus on opioids, together with an in-depth discussion of the physiological characteristics of the nasal cavity as well as physicochemical properties (lipophilicity, molecular weight, ionisation) and pharmaceutical factors (absorption enhancers, devices for application) that should be considered for the development of nasal drugs. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implementation of a transit compartment model for describing drug absorption in pharmacokinetic studies.

            To compare the performance of the standard lag time model (LAG model) with the performance of an analytical solution of the transit compartment model (TRANSIT model) in the evaluation of four pharmacokinetic studies with four different compounds. The population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using NONMEM on concentration-time data of glibenclamide, furosemide, amiloride, and moxonidine. In the TRANSIT model, the optimal number of transit compartments was estimated from the data. This was based on an analytical solution for the change in drug concentration arising from a series of transit compartments with the same first-order transfer rate between each compartment. Goodness-of-fit was assessed by the decrease in objective function value (OFV) and by inspection of diagnostic graphs. With the TRANSIT model, the OFV was significantly lower and the goodness-of-fit was markedly improved in the absorption phase compared with the LAG model for all drugs. The parameter estimates related to the absorption differed between the two models while the estimates of the pharmacokinetic disposition parameters were similar. Based on these results, the TRANSIT model is an attractive alternative for modeling drug absorption delay, especially when a LAG model poorly describes the drug absorption phase or is numerically unstable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intranasal delivery of systemic-acting drugs: small-molecules and biomacromolecules.

              As a non-invasive route, intranasal administration offers patient comfort and compliance which are hurdled in parenteral drug therapy. In addition, the current recognition that the high permeability and vascularization of nasal mucosa coupled to the avoidance of the first-pass elimination and/or gastrointestinal decomposition ensure higher systemic drug absorption than oral route has contributed to the growing interest for intranasal delivery of drugs that require considerable systemic exposure to exert their therapeutic actions (systemic-acting drugs). Nevertheless, several features may hamper drug absorption through the nasal mucosa, particularly the drug molecular weight and intrinsic permeability, and, therefore, several strategies have been employed to improve it, propelling a constant challenge during nasal drug (formulation) development. This review will firstly provide an anatomical, histological and mechanistic overview of drug systemic absorption after nasal administration and the relevant aspects of the therapeutic interest and limitations of the intranasal systemic delivery. The current studies regarding the nasal application of systemic-acting small drugs (analgesic drugs, cardiovascular drugs and antiviral drugs) and biomacromolecular drugs (peptide/protein drugs and vaccines) will also be outlined, addressing drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic improvements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                02 March 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 837492
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Hospital Pharmacy, University Children's Hospital Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [2] 2Emergency Unit, University Children's Hospital Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [3] 3PEDeus, A Subsidiary of the University Children's Hospital Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [4] 4Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics Research Center, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB) , Basel, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Catherine M. T. Sherwin, Wright State University, United States

                Reviewed by: Pavla Pokorna, Charles University, Czechia; Jonathan Michael Davis, Tufts University, United States

                *Correspondence: Miriam Pfiffner miriam.pfiffner@ 123456kispi.uzh.ch

                This article was submitted to Obstetric and Pediatric Pharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                †These authors share last authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2022.837492
                8926166
                35311056
                bf0bc020-31e5-4540-9d23-35a910b62832
                Copyright © 2022 Pfiffner, Berger-Olah, Vonbach, Pfister and Gotta.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 December 2021
                : 24 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 9, Words: 6133
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Original Research

                nalbuphine,opioid analgesics,pharmacokinetics,pharmacodynamics,exposure response,infants,pediatrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content384

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors232