0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Time to Regain Birthweight and Association with Neurodevelopmental Outcomes among Extremely Preterm Newborns

      Preprint
      research-article
      This is not the latest version for this article. If you want to read the latest version, click here.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Determine association between time to regain birthweight and 2-year neurodevelopment among extremely preterm (EP) newborns.

          Study Design:

          Secondary analysis of the Preterm Erythropoietin Neuroprotection Trial evaluating time to regain birthweight, time from birth to weight nadir, time from nadir to regain birthweight, and cumulative weight loss with 2-year corrected Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd edition.

          Results

          Among n = 654 EP neonates, those with shorter nadir-to-regain had lower cognitive scores (2–4 days versus ≥ 8 days: −3.5, [CI −7.0, 0.0]; ≤1 day versus ≥ 8 days: −5.0, [CI −10.2, 0.0]) in fully adjusted stepwise forward regression modeling. Increasingly cumulative weight loss was associated with lower cognitive scores (−50 to <−23 percent-days: −4.0, [95% CI −7.6, −0.4]) and language scores (≤−50 percent-days: −5.7, [CI −9.8, −1.6]; −50 to <−23 percent-days: −6.1, [CI −10.2, −2.0]).

          Conclusion

          Faster nadir-to-regain and prolonged, severe weight loss are associated with adverse 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes.

          Trial registration

          PENUT Trial Registration: NCT01378273. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01378273

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies.

          In the absence of prior knowledge about population relations, investigators frequently employ a strategy that uses the data to help them decide whether to adjust for a variable. The authors compared the performance of several such strategies for fitting multiplicative Poisson regression models to cohort data: 1) the "change-in-estimate" strategy, in which a variable is controlled if the adjusted and unadjusted estimates differ by some important amount; 2) the "significance-test-of-the-covariate" strategy, in which a variable is controlled if its coefficient is significantly different from zero at some predetermined significance level; 3) the "significance-test-of-the-difference" strategy, which tests the difference between the adjusted and unadjusted exposure coefficients; 4) the "equivalence-test-of-the-difference" strategy, which significance-tests the equivalence of the adjusted and unadjusted exposure coefficients; and 5) a hybrid strategy that takes a weighted average of adjusted and unadjusted estimates. Data were generated from 8,100 population structures at each of several sample sizes. The performance of the different strategies was evaluated by computing bias, mean squared error, and coverage rates of confidence intervals. At least one variation of each strategy that was examined performed acceptably. The change-in-estimate and equivalence-test-of-the-difference strategies performed best when the cut-point for deciding whether crude and adjusted estimates differed by an important amount was set to a low value (10%). The significance test strategies performed best when the alpha level was set to much higher than conventional levels (0.20).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants.

            The objectives of this study were to assess whether (1) in-hospital growth velocity is predictive of neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants and (2) in-hospital growth velocity contributes to these outcomes after controlling for confounding demographic and clinical variables. Infants 501 to 1000 g birth weight from a multicenter cohort study were divided into quartiles of in-hospital growth velocity rates. Variables considered for the logistic-regression models included gender, race, gestational age, small for gestational age, mother's education, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, age at regaining birth weight, necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset infection, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, postnatal steroid therapy for pulmonary disease, and center. Of the 600 discharged infants, 495 (83%) were evaluated at 18 to 22 months' corrected age. As the rate of weight gain increased between quartile 1 and quartile 4, from 12.0 to 21.2 g/kg per day, the incidence of cerebral palsy, Bayley II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) <70 and Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) <70, abnormal neurologic examination, neurodevelopmental impairment, and need for rehospitalization fell significantly. Similar findings were observed as the rate of head circumference growth increased. The in-hospital rate of growth was associated with the likelihood of anthropometric measurements at 18 months' corrected age below the 10th percentile values of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth curve. Logistic-regression analyses, controlling for potential demographic or clinical cofounders, and adjusted for center, identified a significant relationship between growth velocity and the likelihood of cerebral palsy, MDI and PDI scores of <70, and neurodevelopmental impairment. These analyses suggest that growth velocity during an ELBW infant's NICU hospitalization exerts a significant, and possibly independent, effect on neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants.

              The interpretation of growth rates for very low birth weight infants is obscured by limited data, recent changes in perinatal care, and the uncertain effects of multiple therapies. To develop contemporary postnatal growth curves for very low birth weight preterm infants and to relate growth velocity to birth weight, nutritional practices, fetal growth status (small- or appropriate-for-gestational-age), and major neonatal morbidities (chronic lung disease, nosocomial infection or late-onset infection, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis). Large, multicenter, prospective cohort study. Growth was prospectively assessed for 1660 infants with birth weights between 501 to 1500 g admitted by 24 hours of age to 1 of the 12 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers between August 31, 1994 and August 9, 1995. Infants were included if they survived >7 days (168 hours) and were free of major congenital anomalies. Anthropometric measures (body weight, length, head circumference, and midarm circumference) were performed from birth until discharge, transfer, death, age 120 days, or a body weight of 2000 g. To obtain representative data, nutritional practices were not altered by the study protocol. Postnatal growth curves suitable for clinical and research use were constructed for body weight, length, head circumference, and midarm circumference. Once birth weight was regained, weight gain (14.4-16.1 g/kg/d) approximated intrauterine rates. However, at hospital discharge, most infants born between 24 and 29 weeks of gestation had not achieved the median birth weight of the reference fetus at the same postmenstrual age. Gestational age, race, and gender had no effect on growth within 100-g birth weight strata. Appropriate-for-gestational age infants who survived to hospital discharge without developing chronic lung disease, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, or late onset-sepsis gained weight faster than comparable infants with those morbidities. More rapid weight gain was also associated with a shorter duration of parenteral nutrition providing at least 75% of the total daily fluid volume, an earlier age at the initiation of enteral feedings, and an earlier age at achievement of full enteral feedings. These growth curves may be used to better understand postnatal growth, to help identify infants developing illnesses affecting growth, and to aid in the design of future research. They should not be taken as optimal. Randomized clinical trials should be performed to evaluate whether different nutritional management practices will permit birth weight to be regained earlier and result in more rapid growth, more appropriate body composition, and improved short- and long-term outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Res Sq
                ResearchSquare
                Research Square
                American Journal Experts
                14 September 2023
                : rs.3.rs-3249598
                Affiliations
                University of Washington
                University of Washington
                University of Washington
                University of Washington - Seattle Children’s Hospital
                University of Washington
                University of Washington
                University of Washington
                Author notes

                Author Contributions:

                GCV and KMP conceptualized the design of the secondary analysis, composed the initial draft of the manuscript, and revised its subsequent versions. TRW performed the statistical analyses. TRW, BAC, DEM, SK, KMS, OCB, KMS, JBL, PJH and SEJ were involved in revisions to the manuscript, and all agreed to the final draft of the manuscript being submitted.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3055-2987
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-2720
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-4842
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1397-8430
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7717-0425
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-6229
                Article
                10.21203/rs.3.rs-3249598
                10.21203/rs.3.rs-3249598/v1
                10543289
                37790304
                bf038143-21e0-4cdf-86d1-0a8a83e6392d

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: U01NS077953
                Award ID: U01NS077955
                Categories
                Article

                time to regain birthweight,weight loss,neonatology,prematurity,neurodevelopment

                Comments

                Comment on this article