1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The relationship between political efficacy and self-rated health: An analysis of Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban subgroups compared to non-Latinx whites in the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Latinx represent a growing population in the United States (US) that continue to experience a disproportionate burden of disease. However, health disparities vary across Latinx subgroups, including Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban communities, particularly when assessing self-rated health. Given the nature of political exclusion in the US, these differences may be associated with underexplored political factors, or political determinants of health, within the social environment that distinctly shape health among racial and ethnic minorities. To explore potential pathways that connect the political environment to individual-level health outcomes among Latinx subgroups, political efficacy (or one's perceptions about one's power to influence political affairs) was assessed as a correlate of self-rated health. We used secondary data from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey to conduct ordered logistic regression analysis to determine whether two domains of political efficacy, internal and external political efficacy, were correlates of self-rated health among Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban subgroups as compared to non-Latinx whites in the US. We also tested for differential associations across Latinx subgroups as compared to non-Latinx whites. The sample consisted of 3156 respondents (1486 Mexicans, 484 Puerto Ricans, 159 Cubans and 1027 non-Latinx whites). Among Puerto Ricans, results revealed that lower levels of internal political efficacy were associated with higher levels of self-rated health. Conversely, among other subgroups, positive associations between internal political efficacy and self-rated health were observed. This study provides empirical evidence of a relationship between internal political perceptions and health perceptions that has not previously been established within the Latinx health disparities literature. Future investigations should continue to examine pathways that connect political determinants to individual-level health outcomes, particularly among communities that disproportionately experience political exclusion.

          Highlights

          • Internal political efficacy was a significant correlate of self-rated health (SRH).

          • Among Puerto Ricans, internal political efficacy was inversely associated with SRH.

          • SRH varies across Latinx subgroups.

          • Puerto Ricans, followed by Mexicans, had the lowest levels of SRH.

          • External political efficacy was not a significant correlate of SRH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Social Determinants of Health: It's Time to Consider the Causes of the Causes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              The social determinants of health: coming of age.

              In the United States, awareness is increasing that medical care alone cannot adequately improve health overall or reduce health disparities without also addressing where and how people live. A critical mass of relevant knowledge has accumulated, documenting associations, exploring pathways and biological mechanisms, and providing a previously unavailable scientific foundation for appreciating the role of social factors in health. We review current knowledge about health effects of social (including economic) factors, knowledge gaps, and research priorities, focusing on upstream social determinants-including economic resources, education, and racial discrimination-that fundamentally shape the downstream determinants, such as behaviors, targeted by most interventions. Research priorities include measuring social factors better, monitoring social factors and health relative to policies, examining health effects of social factors across lifetimes and generations, incrementally elucidating pathways through knowledge linkage, testing multidimensional interventions, and addressing political will as a key barrier to translating knowledge into action.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM Popul Health
                SSM - Population Health
                Elsevier
                2352-8273
                29 March 2023
                June 2023
                29 March 2023
                : 22
                : 101390
                Affiliations
                [a ]New York University, School of Global Public Health, Center for Anti-racism, Social Justice, and Public Health, 708 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA
                [b ]University of California, Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. NYU School of Global Public Health, Center for Anti-racism, Social Justice, and Public Health, 708 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA. amcsorley@ 123456nyu.edu
                Article
                S2352-8273(23)00055-1 101390
                10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101390
                10214832
                be9aad2b-dbb7-477b-aded-08a52238023f
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 December 2022
                : 2 March 2023
                : 27 March 2023
                Categories
                Regular Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article