2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The power of multi-matrix monitoring in the Pan-Arctic region: plastics in water and sediment

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Litter and microplastic assessments are being carried out worldwide. Arctic ecosystems are no exception and plastic pollution is high on the Arctic Council's agenda. Water and sediment have been identified as two of the priority compartments for monitoring plastics under the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Recommendations for monitoring both compartments are presented in this publication. Alone, such samples can provide information on presence, fate, and potential impacts to ecosystems. Together, the quantification of microplastics in sediment and water from the same region produce a three-dimensional picture of plastics, not only a snapshot of floating or buoyant plastics in the surface water or water column but also a picture of the plastics reaching the shoreline or benthic sediments, in lakes, rivers, and the ocean. Assessment methodologies must be adapted to the ecosystems of interest to generate reliable data. In its current form, published data on plastic pollution in the Arctic is sporadic and collected using a wide spectrum of methods which limits the extent to which data can be compared. A harmonised and coordinated effort is needed to gather data on plastic pollution for the Pan-Arctic. Such information will aid in identifying priority regions and focusing mitigation efforts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references120

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          River plastic emissions to the world's oceans

          Plastics in the marine environment have become a major concern because of their persistence at sea, and adverse consequences to marine life and potentially human health. Implementing mitigation strategies requires an understanding and quantification of marine plastic sources, taking spatial and temporal variability into account. Here we present a global model of plastic inputs from rivers into oceans based on waste management, population density and hydrological information. Our model is calibrated against measurements available in the literature. We estimate that between 1.15 and 2.41 million tonnes of plastic waste currently enters the ocean every year from rivers, with over 74% of emissions occurring between May and October. The top 20 polluting rivers, mostly located in Asia, account for 67% of the global total. The findings of this study provide baseline data for ocean plastic mass balance exercises, and assist in prioritizing future plastic debris monitoring and mitigation strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris

            Marine debris, mostly consisting of plastic, is a global problem, negatively impacting wildlife, tourism and shipping. However, despite the durability of plastic, and the exponential increase in its production, monitoring data show limited evidence of concomitant increasing concentrations in marine habitats. There appears to be a considerable proportion of the manufactured plastic that is unaccounted for in surveys tracking the fate of environmental plastics. Even the discovery of widespread accumulation of microscopic fragments (microplastics) in oceanic gyres and shallow water sediments is unable to explain the missing fraction. Here, we show that deep-sea sediments are a likely sink for microplastics. Microplastic, in the form of fibres, was up to four orders of magnitude more abundant (per unit volume) in deep-sea sediments from the Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean than in contaminated sea-surface waters. Our results show evidence for a large and hitherto unknown repository of microplastics. The dominance of microfibres points to a previously underreported and unsampled plastic fraction. Given the vastness of the deep sea and the prevalence of microplastics at all sites we investigated, the deep-sea floor appears to provide an answer to the question—where is all the plastic?
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic

              We detect microplastics in European and Arctic snow, highlighting the importance of atmospheric transport as a pathway.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Arctic Science
                Arctic Science
                Canadian Science Publishing
                2368-7460
                June 24 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Geography, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
                [2 ]IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Kristineberg Marine Research Station, Fiskebäckskil, 450 34, Sweden
                [3 ]Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3, Canada
                [4 ]Geography Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NL A1B 3X9, Canada
                [5 ]Lands and Natural Resources, Nunatsiavut Government, Nain, NL A0P 1L0, Canada
                [6 ]Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, NO-9296, Norway
                [7 ]Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, 27570, Germany
                [8 ]Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR), Lerici, 19032, Italy
                [9 ]Norwegian Research Centre, Department of Climate and Environment, Stavanger, 4068, Norway
                [10 ]Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870 Nordnes, Bergen, NO-5817, Norway
                [11 ]Department of Geography and Environmental Studies and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
                [12 ]Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Helgoland, 27498, Germany
                [13 ]Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, NO-0579, Norway
                [14 ]Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, NO-5006, Norway
                Article
                10.1139/as-2021-0056
                bdbfd3ee-1b66-41a3-92e0-e930fba4a71a
                © 2022

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article