2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genome‐wide DNA methylation analysis identifies potent CpG signature for temzolomide response in non‐G‐CIMP glioblastomas with unmethylated MGMT promoter: MGMT ‐dependent roles of GPR81

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purposes

          To identify potent DNA methylation candidates that could predict response to temozolomide (TMZ) in glioblastomas (GBMs) that do not have glioma‐CpGs island methylator phenotype (G‐CIMP) but have an unmethylated promoter of O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (un MGMT).

          Methods

          The discovery‐validation approach was planned incorporating a series of G‐CIMP−/un MGMT GBM cohorts with DNA methylation microarray data and clinical information, to construct multi‐CpG prediction models. Different bioinformatic and experimental analyses were performed for biological exploration.

          Results

          By analyzing discovery sets with radiotherapy (RT) plus TMZ versus RT alone, we identified a panel of 64 TMZ efficacy‐related CpGs, from which a 10‐CpG risk signature was further constructed. Both the 64‐CpG panel and the 10‐CpG risk signature were validated showing significant correlations with overall survival of G‐CIMP−/un MGMT GBMs when treated with RT/TMZ, rather than RT alone. The 10‐CpG risk signature was further observed for aiding TMZ choice by distinguishing differential outcomes to RT/TMZ versus RT within each risk subgroup. Functional studies on GPR81, the gene harboring one of the 10 CpGs, indicated its distinct impacts on TMZ resistance in GBM cells, which may be dependent on the status of MGMT expression.

          Conclusions

          The 64 TMZ efficacy‐related CpGs and in particular the 10‐CpG risk signature may serve as promising predictive biomarker candidates for guiding optimal usage of TMZ in G‐CIMP−/un MGMT GBMs.

          Abstract

          By analyzing DNA methylation microarray data and clinical information of glioblastomas (GBMs) that do not have glioma‐CpGs island methylator phenotype (G‐CIMP) but have an unmethylated promoter of O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (unMGMT), a panel of 64 CpGs and a 10‐CpG risk score signature were discovered and validated with specific linkage to temozolomide (TMZ) efficacy. Experimental data provided biological clues behind the risk signature. The 64 CpGs and in particular the 10‐CpG signature may serve as promising predictive biomarker candidates for guiding optimal usage of TMZ in GBMs with G‐CIMP‐ and un MGMT.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles

          Although genomewide RNA expression analysis has become a routine tool in biomedical research, extracting biological insight from such information remains a major challenge. Here, we describe a powerful analytical method called Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) for interpreting gene expression data. The method derives its power by focusing on gene sets, that is, groups of genes that share common biological function, chromosomal location, or regulation. We demonstrate how GSEA yields insights into several cancer-related data sets, including leukemia and lung cancer. Notably, where single-gene analysis finds little similarity between two independent studies of patient survival in lung cancer, GSEA reveals many biological pathways in common. The GSEA method is embodied in a freely available software package, together with an initial database of 1,325 biologically defined gene sets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Pan-cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade.

            The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed the genomic landscapes of human cancers. In parallel, immunotherapy is transforming the treatment of advanced cancers. Unfortunately, the majority of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, making the identification of predictive markers and the mechanisms of resistance an area of intense research. To increase our understanding of tumor-immune cell interactions, we characterized the intratumoral immune landscapes and the cancer antigenomes from 20 solid cancers and created The Cancer Immunome Atlas (https://tcia.at/). Cellular characterization of the immune infiltrates showed that tumor genotypes determine immunophenotypes and tumor escape mechanisms. Using machine learning, we identified determinants of tumor immunogenicity and developed a scoring scheme for the quantification termed immunophenoscore. The immunophenoscore was a superior predictor of response to anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies in two independent validation cohorts. Our findings and this resource may help inform cancer immunotherapy and facilitate the development of precision immuno-oncology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.

              Non-biological experimental variation or "batch effects" are commonly observed across multiple batches of microarray experiments, often rendering the task of combining data from these batches difficult. The ability to combine microarray data sets is advantageous to researchers to increase statistical power to detect biological phenomena from studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or in studies that require the sequential hybridization of arrays. In general, it is inappropriate to combine data sets without adjusting for batch effects. Methods have been proposed to filter batch effects from data, but these are often complicated and require large batch sizes ( > 25) to implement. Because the majority of microarray studies are conducted using much smaller sample sizes, existing methods are not sufficient. We propose parametric and non-parametric empirical Bayes frameworks for adjusting data for batch effects that is robust to outliers in small sample sizes and performs comparable to existing methods for large samples. We illustrate our methods using two example data sets and show that our methods are justifiable, easy to apply, and useful in practice. Software for our method is freely available at: http://biosun1.harvard.edu/complab/batch/.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lianpipi1984@aliyun.com
                yinanan@aliyun.com
                zhangshuqun1971@aliyun.com
                Journal
                CNS Neurosci Ther
                CNS Neurosci Ther
                10.1111/(ISSN)1755-5949
                CNS
                CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1755-5930
                1755-5949
                13 October 2023
                April 2024
                : 30
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1002/cns.v30.4 )
                : e14465
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Oncology The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi China
                [ 2 ] The Emergency Department The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital Beijing China
                [ 3 ] Department of Pediatric Surgery The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi China
                [ 4 ] CNRS, UMR 6290, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes (IGdR) Rennes France
                [ 5 ] Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital Air Force Medical University Xi'an China
                [ 6 ] Institute of Neurosciences, College of Basic Medicine Air Force Medical University Xi'an China
                [ 7 ] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Air Force Medical University Xi'an China
                [ 8 ] Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital Air Force Medical University Xi'an China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                An‐An Yin, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Air Force Medical University and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Changle West Road, No. 169, Xi'an, 710032, China.

                Email: yinanan@ 123456aliyun.com

                Fang‐Fang Liu, Institute of Neurosciences, College of Basic Medicine, Air Force Medical University, Changle West Road, No. 169, Xi'an, 710032, China.

                Email: lianpipi1984@ 123456aliyun.com

                Shu‐Qun Zhang, Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.

                Email: zhangshuqun1971@ 123456aliyun.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-5551
                Article
                CNS14465 CNSNT-2022-584.R4
                10.1111/cns.14465
                11017469
                37830163
                bcf2be69-1c7b-449c-99a3-c5647f188281
                © 2023 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 04 July 2023
                : 09 August 2022
                : 05 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 2, Pages: 16, Words: 8831
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China , doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 81402049
                Funded by: Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province , doi 10.13039/501100007128;
                Award ID: 2023‐JCYB‐641
                Funded by: Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100007129;
                Award ID: ZR2020QH0233
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.0 mode:remove_FC converted:15.04.2024

                Neurosciences
                dna methylation,glioblastoma,predictive biomarker,temozolomide,unmethylated mgmt
                Neurosciences
                dna methylation, glioblastoma, predictive biomarker, temozolomide, unmethylated mgmt

                Comments

                Comment on this article