3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Their Predictors: A National Cohort

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale

          Although noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is increasingly used in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), the data supporting its benefit for this indication are lacking.

          Objectives

          To analyze the all-cause in-hospital mortality rate and length of stay (LOS) for ARDS patients who received NIPPV in the United States (US) compared to those who were initially intubated. Our secondary outcome of interest was to determine the predicting factors for NIPPV failure.

          Methods

          We used the 2016 National Inpatient Sample database to identify 4,277 adult records with ARDS who required positive pressure ventilation. We divided the cohort into initial treatment with IMV or NIPPV. Then, the NIPPV group was further subdivided into NIPPV failure or success. We defined NIPPV failure as same-patient use of NIPPV and IMV either on the same day or using IMV at a later date. We analyzed the in-hospital mortality, LOS, and NIPPV failure rate. Linear regression of log-transformed LOS and logistic regression of binary outcomes were used to test for associations.

          Results

          The NIPPV success group had the lowest mortality rate (4.9% [3.8, 6.4]) and the shortest LOS (7 days [6.6, 7.5]). The NIPPV failure rate was 21%. Sepsis, pneumonia, and chronic liver disease were associated with higher odds of NIPPV failure (adjusted OR: 4.47, 2.65, and 2.23, respectively). There was no significant difference between NIPPV failure and IMV groups in-hospital mortality (26.9% [21.8, 32.8] vs. 25.1% [23.5, 26.9], p=0.885) or LOS (16 [14, 18] vs. 15.6 [15, 16.3], p=0.926).

          Conclusions

          NIPPV success in ARDS exhibits significantly lower hospital mortality rates and shorter LOS compared with IMV, and NIPPV failure exhibits no significant difference in hospital mortality or LOS compared with patients who were initially intubated. Therefore, an initial trial of NIPPV may be considered in ARDS. Sepsis, pneumonia, and chronic liver disease were associated with higher odds of NIPPV failure; these factors should be used to stratify patients to the most suitable ventilation modality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation Delivered by Helmet vs Face Mask on the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

          Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with a face mask is relatively ineffective at preventing endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Delivery of NIV with a helmet may be a superior strategy for these patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adherence to Methodological Standards in Research Using the National Inpatient Sample

            Publicly available data sets hold much potential, but their unique design may require specific analytic approaches.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation for De Novo Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Role of Tidal Volume.

              A low or moderate expired tidal volume can be difficult to achieve during noninvasive ventilation for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (i.e., not due to exacerbation of chronic lung disease or cardiac failure). We assessed expired tidal volume and its association with noninvasive ventilation outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Crit Care Res Pract
                Crit Care Res Pract
                CCRP
                Critical Care Research and Practice
                Hindawi
                2090-1305
                2090-1313
                2019
                18 September 2019
                : 2019
                : 8106145
                Affiliations
                1Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
                2Clinical Research Institute, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
                3Department of Internal Medicine, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Centre, Chicago, IL, USA
                4Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Rao R. Ivatury

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-2936
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3824-9031
                Article
                10.1155/2019/8106145
                6766679
                31641538
                bb60a42a-9be2-4085-9958-d466b7d670a0
                Copyright © 2019 Ahmed Taha et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 9 June 2019
                : 24 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Texas Tech University
                Categories
                Research Article

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article