2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Nowadays museums make large use of digital materials (e.g., virtual tours) to attract visitors. Therefore, it is worthwhile investigating which variables affect the engagement with art outside the museum, and whether digital reproductions of artworks are as effective as museum originals in producing a satisfying aesthetic experience.

          Methods

          Here we tested the effectiveness of introducing additional informative materials on the artistic enjoyment of contemporary paintings presented on a computer screen. Naïve observers were exposed to essential and descriptive labels before viewing artworks. We flanked traditional measurement methods - viewing times and questionnaires, with biometric parameters – pupil responses, eye movements, heart rate, and electrodermal activity. The results were then compared to our previous museum study that adopted the same experimental paradigm.

          Results

          Our behavioral and psychophysiological data lead to a complex pattern of results. As found in the museum setting, providing detailed descriptions decreases complexity, evokes more positive sensations, and induces pupil dilation but does not enhance aesthetic appreciation. These results suggested that informative labels improve understanding and emotions but have a limited impact on the hedonic evaluation of artworks in both contexts. However, other results do not mirror those found in the museum; in the laboratory setting, participants spend a similar amount of time, have a comparable gaze behavior, and their electrodermal activity and heart rate do not change when viewing artworks with different types of labels. The main difference between the lab and museum settings is the shorter time spent viewing digital reproductions vs. real paintings, although subjective ratings (e.g., liking, interest) are comparable.

          Discussion

          Overall, this study indicates that the environmental context does impact the aesthetic experience; although, some beneficial effects of introducing additional relevant content in labels accompanying artworks can also be acquainted through digital media outside of the museum.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

          G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Psychophysics Toolbox.

            D Brainard (1997)
            The Psychophysics Toolbox is a software package that supports visual psychophysics. Its routines provide an interface between a high-level interpreted language (MATLAB on the Macintosh) and the video display hardware. A set of example programs is included with the Toolbox distribution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

              Pupil diameter was monitored during picture viewing to assess effects of hedonic valence and emotional arousal on pupillary responses. Autonomic activity (heart rate and skin conductance) was concurrently measured to determine whether pupillary changes are mediated by parasympathetic or sympathetic activation. Following an initial light reflex, pupillary changes were larger when viewing emotionally arousing pictures, regardless of whether these were pleasant or unpleasant. Pupillary changes during picture viewing covaried with skin conductance change, supporting the interpretation that sympathetic nervous system activity modulates these changes in the context of affective picture viewing. Taken together, the data provide strong support for the hypothesis that the pupil's response during affective picture viewing reflects emotional arousal associated with increased sympathetic activity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1163566/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2017144/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                01 July 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1342667
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurofarba, University of Florence , Florence, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Simona Collina, Suor Orsola Benincasa University of Naples, Italy

                Reviewed by: Branka Spehar, University of New South Wales, Australia

                Pablo P. L. Tinio, Montclair State University, United States

                *Correspondence: Serena Castellotti, serena.castellotti@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1342667
                11248719
                39011289
                bafea8d4-c481-4bfe-a7a1-0e4f3a9cec27
                Copyright © 2024 Castellotti, D’Agostino and Del Viva.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 November 2023
                : 14 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 99, Pages: 15, Words: 12814
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This project was funded by the European Union – Next Generation EU, in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Mission 4 Component 2 – Investment 1.5 Ecosystems of Innovation, project Tuscany Health Ecosystem (THE) (ECS00000017, CUP B83C22003920001). This project was also partially funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (Grant Agreement No. 832813, GenPercept “Spatio-temporal mechanisms of generative perception”), and by the European Union – Next Generation EU, in the context of the grant PRIN 2022 (project “RIGHTSTRESS—Tuning arousal for optimal perception,” Grant no. 2022CCPJ3J, CUP I53D23003960006).
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Performance Science

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                neuroaesthetic,artworks labels,digital art,psychophysiology,museum vs. laboratory setting,pupillometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content195

                Most referenced authors676