93
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Randomized Trial of Factor VIII and Neutralizing Antibodies in Hemophilia A.

      1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      The New England journal of medicine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The development of neutralizing anti-factor VIII alloantibodies (inhibitors) in patients with severe hemophilia A may depend on the concentrate used for replacement therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Factor VIII products and inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A.

          For previously untreated children with severe hemophilia A, it is unclear whether the type of factor VIII product administered and switching among products are associated with the development of clinically relevant inhibitory antibodies (inhibitor development). We evaluated 574 consecutive patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII activity, <0.01 IU per milliliter) who were born between 2000 and 2010 and collected data on all clotting-factor administration for up to 75 exposure days. The primary outcome was inhibitor development, which was defined as at least two positive inhibitor tests with decreased in vivo recovery of factor VIII levels. Inhibitory antibodies developed in 177 of the 574 children (cumulative incidence, 32.4%); 116 patients had a high-titer inhibitory antibody, defined as a peak titer of at least 5 Bethesda units per milliliter (cumulative incidence, 22.4%). Plasma-derived products conferred a risk of inhibitor development that was similar to the risk with recombinant products (adjusted hazard ratio as compared with recombinant products, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.49). As compared with third-generation full-length recombinant products (derived from the full-length complementary DNA sequence of human factor VIII), second-generation full-length products were associated with an increased risk of inhibitor development (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.37). The content of von Willebrand factor in the products and switching among products were not associated with the risk of inhibitor development. Recombinant and plasma-derived factor VIII products conferred similar risks of inhibitor development, and the content of von Willebrand factor in the products and switching among products were not associated with the risk of inhibitor development. Second-generation full-length recombinant products were associated with an increased risk, as compared with third-generation products. (Funded by Bayer Healthcare and Baxter BioScience.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The epidemiology of inhibitors in haemophilia A: a systematic review.

            This paper emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the prevalence, incidence and cumulative incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia A. Incidence and cumulative incidence data will include patients with transient inhibitors or whose inhibitors have been eliminated by treatment. As these will not be included in prevalence data, prevalence studies will tend to give rise to lower figures than incidence studies. As a result, the most accurate estimates of the true risk of inhibitor development comes from prospective studies of newly diagnosed haemophiliacs who are tested regularly for the presence of inhibitors. This paper reports a systematic review of the best available evidence relating to the epidemiology of inhibitors in haemophilia A. Cohort studies, registry data reporting incidence or prevalence of inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A, and prospective studies of factor VIII (FVIII) in the treatment of previously untreated patients which reported the development of inhibitors as an outcome, were included in the review. The overall prevalence of inhibitors in unselected haemophiliac populations was found to be 5-7%. The cumulative risk of inhibitor development varied (0-39%). Incidence and prevalence were substantially higher in patients with severe haemophilia. Studies of patients using a single plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) preparation reported lower inhibitor incidence than those using multiple pdFVIII preparations or single recombinant FVIII preparations. Incidence data should be used to estimate the likely demand for treatments aimed at eliminating inhibitors, whereas the best estimates of the overall burden to the National Health Service (NHS) of treating bleeding episodes in patients with continuing inhibitors will come from prevalence studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment-related risk factors of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: the CANAL cohort study.

              The CANAL Study (Concerted Action on Neutralizing Antibodies in severe hemophilia A) was designed to describe the relationship between treatment characteristics and inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This multicenter retrospective cohort study investigated 366 consecutive patients born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers combined with a decreased recovery. Eighty-seven (24%) patients developed inhibitors (69 high titer [19%]). The incidence of inhibitors appeared to be associated with age at first treatment, decreasing from 41% for those treated within the first month of age to 18% in those treated after 18 months; after adjustment for treatment intensity, this association largely disappeared. Surgical procedures and peak treatment moments at start of treatment increased inhibitor risk (relative risk [RR], 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-7.1; and RR, 3.3; CI, 2.1-5.3, respectively). Regular prophylaxis was associated with a 60% lower risk than on-demand treatment (RR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.8). Our findings suggest that the previously reported associated between an early age at first exposure and the risk of inhibitor development is largely explained by early, intensive treatment. The latter appears to be an independent risk factor for inhibitor development. In addition, early, regular prophylaxis may protect patients with hemophilia against the development of inhibitors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                N. Engl. J. Med.
                The New England journal of medicine
                1533-4406
                0028-4793
                May 26 2016
                : 374
                : 21
                Affiliations
                [1 ] From the Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (F.P., P.M.M., E.S., M.E.M.), and Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano (F.P., P.M.M., I.G.), Milan, Clinica Medica II, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Centro Emofilia, Padua (E.Z.), and Ematologia, Unità Operativa Diagnostica Speciale e Terapia delle Malattie dell'Emostasi e della Trombosi, Università Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome (M.G.M.) - all in Italy; the Pediatric Hematology Department, Cairo University Pediatric Hospital (A.E.-B.), and Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (M.E.), Cairo; Jehangir Clinical Development Center, Department of Hematology, Jehangir Hospital Premises (V.R.), and Sahyadri Speciality Hospital (S.A.), Pune, Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra Medical College, Davangere (S.H.), Center for Blood Disorders, Chennai (R.V.), Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai (M.V.M.); St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore (C.R.), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Hematology (T.S.), and Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Institute for Child Health, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (A.S.), New Delhi, Melaka-Manipal Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal (D.M.N.), and Kerala Institute of Medical Science, Trivandrum (M.T.) - all in India; the Congenital Pediatric Hematologic Disorders Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran (P.E.), and Hematology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz (M.K.) - both in Iran; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles (G.Y.), and City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte (N.P.E.) - both in California; Hospital de Especialidades Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Monterrey (A.C.S.G.), an
                Article
                10.1056/NEJMoa1516437
                27223147
                baf71297-2d80-4a35-ad43-69d5b9924b66
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article