51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Restoring degraded land to combat environmental degradation requires the collection of vast quantities of germplasm (seed). Sourcing this material raises questions related to provenance selection, seed quality and harvest sustainability. Restoration guidelines strongly recommend using local sources to maximize local adaptation and prevent outbreeding depression, but in highly modified landscapes this restricts collection to small remnants where limited, poor quality seed is available, and where harvesting impacts may be high. We review three principles guiding the sourcing of restoration germplasm: (i) the appropriateness of using ‘local’ seed, (ii) sample sizes and population characteristics required to capture sufficient genetic diversity to establish self-sustaining populations and (iii) the impact of over-harvesting source populations. We review these topics by examining current collection guidelines and the evidence supporting these, then we consider if the guidelines can be improved and the consequences of not doing so. We find that the emphasis on local seed sourcing will, in many cases, lead to poor restoration outcomes, particularly at broad geographic scales. We suggest that seed sourcing should concentrate less on local collection and more on capturing high quality and genetically diverse seed to maximize the adaptive potential of restoration efforts to current and future environmental change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references127

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management.

          As populations become increasingly fragmented, managers are often faced with the dilemma that intentional hybridization might save a population from inbreeding depression but it might also induce outbreeding depression. While empirical evidence for inbreeding depression is vastly greater than that for outbreeding depression, the available data suggest that risks of outbreeding, particularly in the second generation, are on par with the risks of inbreeding. Predicting the relative risks in any particular situation is complicated by variation among taxa, characters being measured, level of divergence between hybridizing populations, mating history, environmental conditions and the potential for inbreeding and outbreeding effects to be occurring simultaneously. Further work on consequences of interpopulation hybridization is sorely needed with particular emphasis on the taxonomic scope, the duration of fitness problems and the joint effects of inbreeding and outbreeding. Meanwhile, managers can minimize the risks of both inbreeding and outbreeding by using intentional hybridization only for populations clearly suffering from inbreeding depression, maximizing the genetic and adaptive similarity between populations, and testing the effects of hybridization for at least two generations whenever possible.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Population Biology of Plants.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees.

              The theoretical impacts of anthropogenic habitat degradation on genetic resources have been well articulated. Here we use a simulation approach to assess the magnitude of expected genetic change, and review 31 studies of 23 neotropical tree species to assess whether empirical case studies conform to theory. Major differences in the sensitivity of measures to detect the genetic health of degraded populations were obvious. Most studies employing genetic diversity (nine out of 13) found no significant consequences, yet most that assessed progeny inbreeding (six out of eight), reproductive output (seven out of 10) and fitness (all six) highlighted significant impacts. These observations are in line with theory, where inbreeding is observed immediately following impact, but genetic diversity is lost slowly over subsequent generations, which for trees may take decades. Studies also highlight the ecological, not just genetic, consequences of habitat degradation that can cause reduced seed set and progeny fitness. Unexpectedly, two studies examining pollen flow using paternity analysis highlight an extensive network of gene flow at smaller spatial scales (less than 10 km). Gene flow can thus mitigate against loss of genetic diversity and assist in long-term population viability, even in degraded landscapes. Unfortunately, the surveyed studies were too few and heterogeneous to examine concepts of population size thresholds and genetic resilience in relation to life history. Future suggested research priorities include undertaking integrated studies on a range of species in the same landscapes; better documentation of the extent and duration of impact; and most importantly, combining neutral marker, pollination dynamics, ecological consequences, and progeny fitness assessment within single studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Evol Appl
                Evol Appl
                eva
                Evolutionary Applications
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1752-4571
                1752-4571
                November 2008
                04 September 2008
                : 1
                : 4
                : 587-597
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleCSIRO Plant Industry Canberra, ACT, Australia
                [2 ]simpleEcology & Evolutionary Biology, The University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA, Australia
                [3 ]simpleDepartment of Environment and Conservation, Bentley Delivery Centre WA, Australia
                [4 ]simpleCSIRO Entomology Canberra, ACT, Australia
                [5 ]simpleCSIRO Centre for Environment and Life Sciences Wembley, WA, Australia
                [6 ]simpleSchool of Botany, The University of Melbourne Parkerville, VIC, Australia
                Author notes
                Linda M. Broadhurst, CSIRO Plant Industry, PO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 6246 4988; fax: +61 2 6246 5000; e-mail: Linda.Broadhurst@ 123456csiro.au
                Article
                10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00045.x
                3352390
                25567799
                bacc0782-7615-416a-b709-04683e568dc9
                © 2008 CSIRO. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
                History
                : 07 May 2008
                : 04 August 2008
                Categories
                Synthesis

                Evolutionary Biology
                seed quality,evolutionary potential,germplasm,genetic diversity,provenance,restoration

                Comments

                Comment on this article