0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Innovative Approach to Using Electronic Health Records Through Health Information Exchange to Build a Chronic Disease Registry in Michigan

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Michigan’s CHRONICLE, the Chronic Disease Registry Linking Electronic Health Record Data, is a near–real-time disease monitoring system designed to harness electronic health record (EHR) data and existing health information exchange (HIE) infrastructure for transformative public health surveillance. Strong evidence indicates that using EHR data in chronic disease monitoring will provide rapid insight over time on health care use, outcomes, and public health interventions. We examined the potential of EHR data for chronic disease surveillance through close collaboration with our statewide HIE network and 2 participating health systems. We describe the development of CHRONICLE, the promising findings from its implementation, the identified challenges, and how those challenges will inform the next steps in testing, refining, and expanding the system. By detailing our approach to developing CHRONICLE and the considerations and early steps required to build an innovative, EHR-based chronic disease registry, we aim to inform public health leaders and professionals on the value of EHR data for chronic disease surveillance. With systematic testing, evaluation, and enhancement, our goal for CHRONICLE, as a fully realized and comprehensive surveillance system, is to model how collaborative health information exchange can support evidence-based strategies, resource allocation, and precision in disease monitoring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health

            Background In the current information age, the use of data has become essential for decision making in public health at the local, national, and global level. Despite a global commitment to the use and sharing of public health data, this can be challenging in reality. No systematic framework or global operational guidelines have been created for data sharing in public health. Barriers at different levels have limited data sharing but have only been anecdotally discussed or in the context of specific case studies. Incomplete systematic evidence on the scope and variety of these barriers has limited opportunities to maximize the value and use of public health data for science and policy. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review of potential barriers to public health data sharing. Documents that described barriers to sharing of routinely collected public health data were eligible for inclusion and reviewed independently by a team of experts. We grouped identified barriers in a taxonomy for a focused international dialogue on solutions. Results Twenty potential barriers were identified and classified in six categories: technical, motivational, economic, political, legal and ethical. The first three categories are deeply rooted in well-known challenges of health information systems for which structural solutions have yet to be found; the last three have solutions that lie in an international dialogue aimed at generating consensus on policies and instruments for data sharing. Conclusions The simultaneous effect of multiple interacting barriers ranging from technical to intangible issues has greatly complicated advances in public health data sharing. A systematic framework of barriers to data sharing in public health will be essential to accelerate the use of valuable information for the global good. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1144) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recent Advances in Their Use and Evaluation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prev Chronic Dis
                Prev Chronic Dis
                PCD
                Preventing Chronic Disease
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                1545-1151
                2024
                06 June 2024
                : 21
                : E41
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, Michigan
                [2 ]Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Applied Public Health Informatics Fellowship Program, Atlanta, Georgia
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Olivia Barth, MPH, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, 333 South Grand Ave, Lansing, MI 48933 ( BarthO@ 123456michigan.gov ).
                Article
                23_0413
                10.5888/pcd21.230413
                11192498
                38843117
                b9bf1385-6537-4ca9-a6c3-f8c127967cea
                Copyright @ 2024

                Preventing Chronic Disease is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Tools for Public Health Practice
                Peer Reviewed

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article