21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sarcopenia, Sarcopenic Obesity and Functional Impairments in Older Adults: NHANES 1999–2004

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Foundation for the NIH (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project validated cutpoints for appendicular lean mass (ALM) to identify individuals with functional impairment. We hypothesized the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity would be similar based on the different FNIH criteria, increase with age, and be associated with risk of impairment limitations. We identified 4,984 subjects ≥60 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999–2004. Sarcopenia was defined using: ALM (males<19.75kg; females<15.02kg), and ALM adjusted for body mass index (BMI) (males<0.789; females<0.512). Sarcopenic obesity is defined as subjects fulfilling criteria for sarcopenia and obesity by body fat (men≥25%; females≥35%). Prevalence rates of both sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity were evaluated with respect to sex, age category (60–69, 70–79, >80years) and race. We assessed the association of physical limitations, basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and sarcopenia status. The mean age was 70.5 years in males and 71.6 years in females. Half (50.8%, n=2,531) were female, and mean BMI was 28kg/m 2 in both sexes. ALM was higher in males than in females (24.1 vs. 16.3; p<0.001) but fat mass was lower (30.9 vs. 42.0;p<0.001). In males, sarcopenia prevalence was 16.0% and 27.8% using the ALM and ALM/BMI criteria. In females, prevalence was 40.5% and 19.3% using the ALM and ALM/BMI criteria. Sarcopenia was associated with a 1.10 [0.86,1.41] and 0.93 [0.74,1.16], and 1.46 [1.10,1.94] and 2.13 [1.41,3.20], risk of physical limitations using the ALM and ALM/BMI definitions in males and females, respectively. Prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity vary greatly, and a uniform definition is needed to identify and characterize these high risk populations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8303331
          22425
          Nutr Res
          Nutr Res
          Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.)
          0271-5317
          1879-0739
          31 March 2016
          07 September 2015
          December 2015
          01 December 2016
          : 35
          : 12
          : 1031-1039
          Affiliations
          [a ]Section of General Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756
          [b ]Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756
          [c ]Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging, 46 Centerra Drive, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756
          [d ]Health Promotion Research Center at Dartmouth, 46 Centerra Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756
          [e ]Dartmouth Weight & Wellness Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756
          [g ]Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: John A. Batsis, MD, FACP, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, Telephone: (603) 653-9500, Facsimile: (603) 650-0915, john.batsis@ 123456gmail.com
          Article
          PMC4825802 PMC4825802 4825802 hhspa772780
          10.1016/j.nutres.2015.09.003
          4825802
          26472145
          b9a4e122-d306-4cce-a446-0ddc895b023f
          History
          Categories
          Article

          epidemiology,body fat,obesity,sarcopenia,function
          epidemiology, body fat, obesity, sarcopenia, function

          Comments

          Comment on this article