1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 7 , the TUBA-WISP II consortium 8 , 9 , 1 ,
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
      BMJ Publishing Group
      Ovarian Cancer, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Carcinoma

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy has gained interest for individuals at high risk for tubo-ovarian cancer as there is compelling evidence that especially high-grade serous carcinoma originates in the fallopian tubes. Two studies have demonstrated a positive effect of salpingectomy on menopause-related quality of life and sexual health compared with standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

          Primary Objective

          To investigate whether salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is non-inferior to the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of tubo-ovarian cancer among individuals at high inherited risk.

          Study Hypothesis

          We hypothesize that postponement of oophorectomy after salpingectomy, to the age of 40–45 ( BRCA1) or 45–50 ( BRCA2) years, compared with the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy at age 35–40 ( BRCA1) or 40–45 ( BRCA2) years, is non-inferior in regard to tubo-ovarian cancer risk.

          Trial Design

          In this international prospective preference trial, participants will choose between the novel salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy and the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy. Salpingectomy can be performed after the completion of childbearing and between the age of 25 and 40 ( BRCA1), 25 and 45 ( BRCA2), or 25 and 50 ( BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers) years. Subsequent oophorectomy is recommended at a maximum delay of 5 years beyond the upper limit of the current guideline age for salpingo-oophorectomy. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline age, which is also the recommended age for salpingo-oophorectomy within the study, is 35–40 years for BRCA1, 40–45 years for BRCA2, and 45–50 years for BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers.

          Major Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

          Premenopausal individuals with a documented class IV or V germline pathogenic variant in the BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D gene who have completed childbearing are eligible for participation. Participants may have a personal history of a non-ovarian malignancy.

          Primary Endpoint

          The primary outcome is the cumulative tubo-ovarian cancer incidence at the target age: 46 years for BRCA1 and 51 years for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.

          Sample size

          The sample size to ensure sufficient power to test non-inferiority of salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy compared with salpingo-oophorectomy requires 1500 BRCA1 and 1500 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.

          Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results

          Participant recruitment is expected to be completed at the end of 2026 (total recruitment period of 5 years). The primary outcome is expected to be available in 2036 (minimal follow-up period of 10 years).

          Trial Registration Number

          NCT04294927.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and survival in women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

          Approximately 10% of women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) carry deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. A recent article suggested that BRCA2-related EOC was associated with an improved prognosis, but the effect of BRCA1 remains unclear. To characterize the survival of BRCA carriers with EOC compared with noncarriers and to determine whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers show similar survival patterns. A pooled analysis of 26 observational studies on the survival of women with ovarian cancer, which included data from 1213 EOC cases with pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA1 (n = 909) or BRCA2 (n = 304) and from 2666 noncarriers recruited and followed up at variable times between 1987 and 2010 (the median year of diagnosis was 1998). Five-year overall mortality. The 5-year overall survival was 36% (95% CI, 34%-38%) for noncarriers, 44% (95% CI, 40%-48%) for BRCA1 carriers, and 52% (95% CI, 46%-58%) for BRCA2 carriers. After adjusting for study and year of diagnosis, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers showed a more favorable survival than noncarriers (for BRCA1: hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89; P < .001; and for BRCA2: HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P < .001). These survival differences remained after additional adjustment for stage, grade, histology, and age at diagnosis (for BRCA1: HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84; P < .001; and for BRCA2: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61; P < .001). The BRCA1 HR estimate was significantly different from the HR estimated in the adjusted model (P for heterogeneity = .003). Among patients with invasive EOC, having a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 was associated with improved 5-year overall survival. BRCA2 carriers had the best prognosis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dysplastic changes in prophylactically removed Fallopian tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer.

            The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of (pre)neoplastic lesions in overtly normal Fallopian tubes from women predisposed to developing ovarian carcinoma. The presence of (pre)neoplastic lesions was scored in histological specimens from 12 women with a genetically determined predisposition for ovarian cancer, of whom seven tested positive for a germline BRCA1 mutation. A control group included 13 women. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expression of p21, p27, p53, cyclin A, cyclin D1, bcl-2, Ki67, HER-2/neu, and the oestrogen and progesterone receptors. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis on the BRCA1 locus was also assessed on dysplastic tissue by PCR studies. Of the 12 women with a predisposition for ovarian cancer, six showed dysplasia, including one case of severe dysplasia. Five harboured hyperplastic lesions and in one woman no histological aberrations were found in the Fallopian tube. No hyperplastic, dysplastic or neoplastic lesions were detected in the Fallopian tubes of control subjects. In the cases studied, morphologically normal tubal epithelium contained a higher proportion of Ki67-expressing cells (p=0.005) and lower fractions of cells expressing p21 (p<0.0001) and p27 (p=0.006) than in the control group. Even higher fractions of proliferating cells were found in dysplastic areas (p=0.07) and accumulation of p53 was observed in the severely dysplastic lesion. Expression patterns of other proteins studied, including the hormone receptors, were similar in cases and controls. One subject, a germline BRCA1 mutation carrier, showed loss of the wild-type BRCA1 allele in the severely dysplastic lesion. In conclusion, the Fallopian tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer frequently harbour dysplastic changes, accompanied by changes in cell-cycle and apoptosis-related proteins, indicating an increased risk of developing tubal cancer. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube

              High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most frequent type of ovarian cancer and has a poor outcome. It has been proposed that fallopian tube cancers may be precursors of HGSOC but evolutionary evidence for this hypothesis has been limited. Here, we perform whole-exome sequence and copy number analyses of laser capture microdissected fallopian tube lesions (p53 signatures, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs), and fallopian tube carcinomas), ovarian cancers, and metastases from nine patients. The majority of tumor-specific alterations in ovarian cancers were present in STICs, including those affecting TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2 or PTEN. Evolutionary analyses reveal that p53 signatures and STICs are precursors of ovarian carcinoma and identify a window of 7 years between development of a STIC and initiation of ovarian carcinoma, with metastases following rapidly thereafter. Our results provide insights into the etiology of ovarian cancer and have implications for prevention, early detection and therapeutic intervention of this disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Gynecol Cancer
                Int J Gynecol Cancer
                ijgc
                ijgc
                International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                1048-891X
                1525-1438
                June 2023
                12 April 2023
                : 33
                : 6
                : 982-987
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentObstetrics & Gynaecology , Ringgold_6034Radboudumc , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [2 ] departmentDepartment for Health Evidence , Ringgold_6034Radboudumc , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Biostatistics , Ringgold_4002The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas, USA
                [4 ] departmentPatholoy , Ringgold_6034Radboudumc , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [5 ] departmentHuman Genetics , Ringgold_6034Radboudumc , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [6 ] departmentObstetrics & Gynecology , Ringgold_7284University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [7 ] departmentScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare , Ringgold_6034Radboudumc , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [8 ] Ringgold_6034Radboudumc , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [9 ] departmentGynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine , Ringgold_4002The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Joanne A de Hullu, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands; Joanne.deHullu@ 123456radboudumc.nl

                MPS and MHDvB are joint first authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-1579
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-9861
                Article
                ijgc-2023-004377
                10.1136/ijgc-2023-004377
                10314019
                37045546
                b8f5c807-f481-417c-96de-b0791fa52ed6
                © IGCS and ESGO 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 March 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004622, KWF Kankerbestrijding;
                Award ID: KUN2021-13228
                Funded by: Any Mountain;
                Categories
                Clinical Trial
                1506
                2423
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                ovarian cancer,brca1 protein,brca2 protein,gynecologic surgical procedures,carcinoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article