31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Preliminary Mixed-Method Investigation of Trust and Hidden Signals in Medical Consultations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Several factors influence patients' trust, and trust influences the doctor-patient relationship. Recent literature has investigated the quality of the personal relationship and its dynamics by considering the role of communication and the elements that influence trust giving in the frame of general practitioner (GP) consultations.

          Objective

          We analysed certain aspects of the interaction between patients and GPs to understand trust formation and maintenance by focusing on communication channels. The impact of socio-demographic variables in trust relationships was also evaluated.

          Method

          A cross-sectional design using concurrent mixed qualitative and quantitative research methods was employed. One hundred adults were involved in a semi-structured interview composed of both qualitative and quantitative items for descriptive and exploratory purposes. The study was conducted in six community-based departments adjacent to primary care clinics in Trento, Italy.

          Results

          The findings revealed that patients trusted their GP to a high extent by relying on simple signals that were based on the quality of the one-to-one communication and on behavioural and relational patterns. Patients inferred the ability of their GP by adopting simple heuristics based mainly on the so-called social “honest signals” rather than on content-dependent features. Furthermore, socio-demographic variables affected trust: less literate and elderly people tended to trust more.

          Conclusions

          This study is unique in attempting to explore the role of simple signals in trust relationships within medical consultation: people shape trust and give meaning to their relationships through a powerful channel of communication that orbits not around words but around social relations. The findings have implications for both clinicians and researchers. For doctors, these results suggest a way of thinking about encounters with patients. For researchers, the findings underline the importance of analysing some new key factors around trust for future investigations in medical practice and education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.

          Given the fluidity with which the term shared decision making (SDM) is used in teaching, assessment and research, we conducted a focused and systematic review of articles that specifically address SDM to determine the range of conceptual definitions. In April 2005, we ran a Pubmed (Medline) search to identify articles published through 31 December 2003 with the words shared decision making in the title or abstract. The search yielded 681 citations, 342 of which were about SDM in the context of physician-patient encounters and published in English. We read and reviewed the full text of all 342 articles, and got any non-redundant references to SDM, which yielded an additional 76 articles. Of the 418 articles examined, 161 (38.5%) had a conceptual definition of SDM. We identified 31 separate concepts used to explicate SDM, but only "patient values/preferences" (67.1%) and "options" (50.9%) appeared in more than half the 161 definitions. Relatively few articles explicitly recognized and integrated previous work. Our review reveals that there is no shared definition of SDM. We propose a definition that integrates the extant literature base and outlines essential elements that must be present for patients and providers to engage in the process of SDM. The integrative definition of SDM is intended to provide a useful foundation for describing and operationalizing SDM in further research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers.

            Existing scales to measure trust in physicians have differing content and limited testing. To improve on these measures, a detailed conceptual model was constructed and a large item pool (n = 78) was generated following a detailed conceptual model and expert review. After pilot testing, the best-performing items were validated with a random national sample (n = 959) and a regional sample of HMO members (n =1,199). Various psychometric tests produced a 10-item unidimensional scale consistent with most aspects of the conceptual model. Compared with previous scales, the Wake Forest physician trust scale has a somewhat improved combination of internal consistency, variability, and discriminability. The scale is more strongly correlated with satisfaction, desire to remain with a physician, willingness to recommend to friends, and not seeking second opinions; it is less correlated with insurer trust, membership in managed care, and choice of physician. Correlations are equivalent with lack of disputes, length of relationship, and number of visits [corrected].
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?

              Despite the profound and pervasive importance of trust in medical settings, there is no commonly shared understanding of what trust means, and little is known about what difference trust actually makes, what factors affect trust, and how trust relates to other similar attitudes and behaviors. To address this gap in understanding, the emerging theoretical, empirical, and public policy literature on trust in physicians and in medical institutions is reviewed and synthesized. Based on this review and additional research and analysis, a formal definition and conceptual model of trust is presented, with a review of the extent to which this model has been confirmed by empirical studies. This conceptual and empirical understanding has significance for ethics, law, and public policy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                11 March 2014
                : 9
                : 3
                : e90941
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Institute of Communication and Health, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
                [3 ]IBM Italia, Milan, Italy
                [4 ]Università Vita e Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
                [5 ]Department for Adaptive Behaviour and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Milan, Italy
                [7 ]Psycho-Oncology Unit, Istituto Europeo Oncologico (IEO), Milan, Italy
                University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: One of the authors is employed by IBM. IBM represents a commercial company, but this affiliation does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: SR MM AA. Performed the experiments: SR MM. Analyzed the data: SR AA PI GP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GP SR PS. Wrote the paper: SR AA IP PS GP.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-09827
                10.1371/journal.pone.0090941
                3949702
                24618683
                b76334fd-4aa2-4d04-b8c1-9448273bd39a
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 February 2013
                : 5 February 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                This research was supported in part by the Department for Adaptive Behaviour and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Königin-Luise-Straße 5,14195, Berlin, Germany for the use of informatics software (Unipark) and by a grant from the lending institution La Cassa Rurale Giudicarie Valsabbia Paganella, (P.Iva 00158520221), Trento Province (Italy). Regulatory affairs and administration details on of the project can be asked directly via website at http://www.lacassarurale.it/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine
                Mental Health
                Psychology
                Human Relations
                Non-Clinical Medicine
                Communication in Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Primary Care
                Public Health
                Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health
                Social and Behavioral Sciences
                Communications
                Psychology
                Applied Psychology
                Behavior
                Human Relations

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article