300
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Memory T Cells in Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection Are Directed against Three Antigenic Islands and Largely Contained in a CXCR3 +CCR6 + Th1 Subset

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An understanding of the immunological footprint of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) CD4 T cell recognition is still incomplete. Here we report that human Th1 cells specific for MTB are largely contained in a CXCR3 +CCR6 + memory subset and highly focused on three broadly immunodominant antigenic islands, all related to bacterial secretion systems. Our results refute the notion that secreted antigens act as a decoy, since both secreted proteins and proteins comprising the secretion system itself are targeted by a fully functional T cell response. In addition, several novel T cell antigens were identified which can be of potential diagnostic use, or as vaccine antigens. These results underline the power of a truly unbiased, genome-wide, analysis of CD4 MTB recognition based on the combined use of epitope predictions, high throughput ELISPOT, and T cell libraries using PBMCs from individuals latently infected with MTB.

          Author Summary

          Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of the most life-threatening pathogens of all time, having infected one-third of the present human population. There is an urgent need for both novel vaccines and diagnostic strategies. Here, we were able to identify the targets most dominantly recognized by latently infected individual that successfully contain infection. These targets are contained in three broadly genomic antigenic islands, all related to bacterial secretion systems and composed by several distinct ORFs. Thus, our results suggest that vaccination with one or few defined antigens will fail to replicate the response associated with natural immunity. Our analysis also pinpoints that the Th1 cells dominating the response are associated with novel and well-defined phenotypic markers, suggesting that the response is molded by unique MTB associated factors. This study demonstrates further that the approach combining peptide binding predictions with modern high throughput techniques is generally applicable to the study of immunity to other complex pathogens. Together, our data provide a new angle in the worldwide fight against M. tuberculosis and could be used for diagnostic or vaccine developments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genetic requirements for mycobacterial survival during infection.

          Despite the importance of tuberculosis as a public health problem, we know relatively little about the molecular mechanisms used by the causative organism, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, to persist in the host. To define these mechanisms, we have mutated virtually every nonessential gene of M. tuberculosis and determined the effect disrupting each gene on the growth rate of this pathogen during infection. A total of 194 genes that are specifically required for mycobacterial growth in vivo were identified. The behavior of these mutants provides a detailed view of the changing environment that the bacterium encounters as infection proceeds. A surprisingly large fraction of these genes are unique to mycobacteria and closely related species, indicating that many of the strategies used by this unusual group of organisms are fundamentally different from other pathogens
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Production of interleukin 22 but not interleukin 17 by a subset of human skin-homing memory T cells.

            Interleukin 22 (IL-22) is a cytokine produced by the T(H)-17 lineage of helper T cells and NK-22 subset of natural killer cells that acts on epithelial cells and keratinocytes and has been linked to skin homeostasis and inflammation. Here we characterize a population of human skin-homing memory CD4(+) T cells that expressed the chemokine receptors CCR10, CCR6 and CCR4 and produced IL-22 but neither IL-17 nor interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma). Clones isolated from this population produced IL-22 only and had low or undetectable expression of the T(H)-17 and T helper type 1 (T(H)1) transcription factors RORgammat and T-bet. The differentiation of T cells producing only IL-22 was efficiently induced in naive T cells by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in an IL-6- and tumor necrosis factor-dependent way. Our findings delineate a previously unknown subset of human CD4(+) effector T cells dedicated to skin pathophysiology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Flexible Programs of Chemokine Receptor Expression on Human Polarized T Helper 1 and 2 Lymphocytes

              Chemokines and their receptors are important elements for the selective attraction of various subsets of leukocytes. To better understand the selective migration of functional subsets of T cells, chemokine receptor expression was analyzed using monoclonal antibodies, RNase protection assays, and the response to distinct chemokines. Naive T cells expressed only CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR)4, whereas the majority of memory/activated T cells expressed CXCR3, and a small proportion expressed CC chemokine receptor (CCR)3 and CCR5. When polarized T cell lines were analyzed, CXCR3 was found to be expressed at high levels on T helper cell (Th)0s and Th1s and at low levels on Th2s. In contrast, CCR3 and CCR4 were found on Th2s. This was confirmed by functional responses: only Th2s responded with an increase in [Ca2+]i to the CCR3 and CCR4 agonists eotaxin and thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC), whereas only Th0s and Th1s responded to low concentrations of the CXCR3 agonists IFN-γ–inducible protein 10 (IP-10) and monokine induced by IFN-γ (Mig). Although CCR5 was expressed on both Th1 and Th2 lines, it was absent in several Th2 clones and its expression was markedly influenced by interleukin 2. Chemokine receptor expression and association with Th1 and Th2 phenotypes was affected by other cytokines present during polarization. Transforming growth factor β inhibited CCR3, but enhanced CCR4 and CCR7 expression, whereas interferon α inhibited CCR3 but upregulated CXCR3 and CCR1. These results demonstrate that chemokine receptors are markers of naive and polarized T cell subsets and suggest that flexible programs of chemokine receptor gene expression may control tissue-specific migration of effector T cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Pathog
                PLoS Pathog
                plos
                plospath
                PLoS Pathogens
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-7366
                1553-7374
                January 2013
                January 2013
                24 January 2013
                : 9
                : 1
                : e1003130
                Affiliations
                [1 ]La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United States of America
                [2 ]Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Bellinzona, Switzerland
                [3 ]Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                [4 ]Antiviral Research Centre, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
                University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: C.S. Lindestam Arlehamn, A. Sette, A. Gerasimova, F. Mele, F. Sallusto, B. Peters, H. Grey. Performed the experiments: C.S. Lindestam Arlehamn, F. Mele, R. Henderson, J. Swann, J.A. Greenbaum, J. Sidney, D.M. McKinney. Analyzed the data: C.S. Lindestam Arlehamn, A. Gerasimova, F. Mele, Y. Kim. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: E.A. James, R. Taplitz, W.W. Kwok. Wrote the paper: C.S. Lindestam Arlehamn, A. Sette, F. Sallusto. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages. Critically read and edited the manuscript: D.M. McKinney, H. Grey.

                Article
                PPATHOGENS-D-12-02349
                10.1371/journal.ppat.1003130
                3554618
                23358848
                b6ec0295-48b2-4884-a663-9413ba32fe9b
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 September 2012
                : 29 November 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Funding
                This work was supported by National Institutes of Health contract N01-AI-900044C (to A. Sette) ( http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm), the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 31-131092 (to F. Sallusto) ( http://www.snf.ch/E/funding/Pages/default.aspx) and the European Commission contract FP7-HEALTH-F3-2009-241745 (to F. Sallusto) ( http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/home). The Institute for Research in Biomedicine is supported by the Helmut Horten Foundation ( http://www.helmut-horten-stiftung.org/e/index2.htm). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Immunology
                Immune Cells
                T Cells
                Immunity
                Adaptive Immunity
                Immune Defense
                Immunity to Infections
                Antigen Processing and Recognition
                Immune Response
                Medicine
                Infectious Diseases
                Bacterial Diseases
                Tuberculosis

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article