8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation of antifibrotic and antifungal combined therapies in experimental pulmonary paracoccidioidomycosis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a systemic mycosis caused by the Paracoccidioides genus. Most of the patients with chronic form present sequelae, like pulmonary fibrosis, with no effective treatment, leading to impaired lung functions. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the antifibrotic activity of three compounds: pentoxifylline (PTX), azithromycin (AZT), and thalidomide (Thal) in a murine model of pulmonary PCM treated with itraconazole (ITC) or cotrimoxazole (CMX). BALB/c mice were inoculated with P. brasiliensis (Pb) by the intratracheal route and after 8 weeks, they were submitted to one of the following six treatments: PTX/ITC, PTX/CMX, AZT/ITC, AZT/CMX, Thal/ITC, and Thal/CMX. After 8 weeks of treatment, the lungs were collected for determination of fungal burden, production of OH-proline, deposition of reticulin fibers, and pulmonary concentrations of cytokines and growth factors. Pb-infected mice treated with PTX/ITC presented a reduction in the pulmonary concentrations of OH-proline, associated with lower concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and higher concentrations of IL-10 compared to the controls. The Pb-infected mice treated with AZT/CMX exhibited decreased pulmonary concentrations of OH-proline associated with lower levels of TGF-β1, and higher levels of IL-10 compared controls. The mice treated with ITC/Thal and CMX/Thal showed intense weight loss, increased deposition of reticulin fibers, high pulmonary concentrations of CCL3, IFN-γ and VEGF, and decreased concentrations of IL-6, IL-1β, IL-17, and TGF-β1. In conclusion, our findings reinforce the antifibrotic role of PTX only when associated with ITC, and AZT only when associated with CMX, but Thal did not show any action upon addition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New insights into TGF-β/Smad signaling in tissue fibrosis

          Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is considered as a crucial mediator in tissue fibrosis and causes tissue scarring largely by activating its downstream small mother against decapentaplegic (Smad) signaling. Different TGF-β signalings play different roles in fibrogenesis. TGF-β1 directly activates Smad signaling which triggers pro-fibrotic gene overexpression. Excessive studies have demonstrated that dysregulation of TGF-β1/Smad pathway was an important pathogenic mechanism in tissue fibrosis. Smad2 and Smad3 are the two major downstream regulator that promote TGF-β1-mediated tissue fibrosis, while Smad7 serves as a negative feedback regulator of TGF-β1/Smad pathway thereby protects against TGF-β1-mediated fibrosis. This review presents an overview of the molecular mechanisms of TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway in renal, hepatic, pulmonary and cardiac fibrosis, followed by an in-depth discussion of their molecular mechanisms of intervention effects both in vitro and in vivo. The role of TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway in tumor or cancer is also discussed. Additionally, the current advances also highlight targeting TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway for the prevention of tissue fibrosis. The review reveals comprehensive pathophysiological mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. Particular challenges are presented and placed within the context of future applications against tissue fibrosis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inflammation and fibrosis

            Tissue damage and inflammation are important triggers for regeneration and fibrosis. Tissue damage not only induces inflammation in general, it also determines the type and polarization of inflammation by recruiting and activating a variety of different cells types of the innate and adaptive immune system. This review focuses on the pathways leading from tissue damage to inflammation, from inflammation to fibrosis and from fibrosis to function. It covers the pro- and antifibrotic properties of immunological mediators released from T cells, monocytes/macrophages, innate lymphoid cells, basophils and eosinophils and takes into account that extracellular matrix proteins are not only produced by mesenchymal fibroblasts but also by other cell types, especially infiltrating hematopoietic cells. The special requirements for activation and recruitment of these so called fibrocytes are described in detail.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hepatic recruitment of the inflammatory Gr1+ monocyte subset upon liver injury promotes hepatic fibrosis.

              In addition to liver-resident Kupffer cells, infiltrating immune cells have recently been linked to the development of liver fibrosis. Blood monocytes are circulating precursors of tissue macrophages and can be divided into two functionally distinct subpopulations in mice: Gr1(hi) (Ly6C(hi)) and Gr1(lo) (Ly6C(lo)) monocytes. The role of these monocyte subsets in hepatic fibrosis and the mechanisms of their differential recruitment into the injured liver are unknown. We therefore characterized subpopulations of infiltrating monocytes in acute and chronic carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4))-induced liver injury in mice using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Inflammatory Gr1(hi) but not Gr1(lo) monocytes are massively recruited into the liver upon toxic injury constituting an up to 10-fold increase in CD11b(+)F4/80(+) intrahepatic macrophages. Comparing wild-type with C-C chemokine receptor (CCR2)-deficient and CCR2/CCR6-deficient mice revealed that CCR2 critically controls intrahepatic Gr1(hi) monocyte accumulation by mediating their egress from bone marrow. During chronic liver damage, intrahepatic CD11b(+)F4/80(+)Gr1(+) monocyte-derived cells differentiate preferentially into inducible nitric oxide synthase-producing macrophages exerting proinflammatory and profibrogenic actions, such as promoting hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, T helper 1-T cell differentiation and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) release. Impaired monocyte subset recruitment in Ccr2(-/-) and Ccr2(-/-)Ccr6(-/-) mice results in reduced HSC activation and diminished liver fibrosis. Moreover, adoptively transferred Gr1(hi) monocytes traffic into the injured liver and promote fibrosis progression in wild-type and Ccr2(-/-)Ccr6(-/-) mice, which are otherwise protected from hepatic fibrosis. Intrahepatic CD11b(+)F4/80(+)Gr1(+) monocyte-derived macrophages purified from CCl(4)-treated animals, but not naïve bone marrow monocytes or control lymphocytes, directly activate HSCs in a TGF-beta-dependent manner in vitro. Inflammatory Gr1(+) monocytes, recruited into the injured liver via CCR2-dependent bone marrow egress, promote the progression of liver fibrosis. Thus, they may represent an interesting novel target for antifibrotic strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Medical Mycology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1369-3786
                1460-2709
                July 2020
                July 01 2020
                October 03 2019
                July 2020
                July 01 2020
                October 03 2019
                : 58
                : 5
                : 667-678
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculdade de Ciências. Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 17033–360 Bauru, SP, Brazil
                [2 ]Faculdade de Medicina (FAMED). Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS). 79070–900 Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
                [3 ]Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima (ILSL), 17034–971 Bauru, SP, Brazil
                [4 ]Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 18618–687 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
                Article
                10.1093/mmy/myz100
                b61d8a3c-f528-4de0-9571-a95b095060bc
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article