There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) is periodically shed throughout the human genital tract.
Although a high viral load correlates with the development of genital ulcers, shedding
also commonly occurs even when ulcers are absent, allowing for silent transmission
during coitus and contributing to high seroprevalence of HSV-2 worldwide. Frequent
viral reactivation occurs within ganglia despite diverse and complementary host and
viral mechanisms that predispose toward latency, suggesting that viral replication
may be constantly occurring in a small minority of neurons at these sites. Within
genital mucosa, the in vivo expansion and clearance rates of HSV-2 are extremely rapid.
Resident dendritic cells and memory HSV-2 specific T cells persist at prior sites
of genital tract reactivation and, in conjunction with prompt innate recognition of
infected cells, lead to rapid containment of infected cells. The fact that immune
responses usually control viral replication in genital skin before lesions develop
provides hope that enhancing such responses could lead to effective vaccines and immunotherapies.
The receptors for interferon-alpha/beta (IFN-alpha/beta) and IFN-gamma activate components of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway, leading to the formation of at least two transcription factor complexes. STAT1 interacts with STAT2 and p48/IRF-9 to form the transcription factor IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3). STAT1 dimers form gamma-activated factor (GAF). ISGF3 is induced mainly by IFN-alpha/beta, and GAF by IFN-gamma, although both factors can be activated by both types of IFN. Individuals with mutations in either chain of the IFN-gamma receptor (IFN-gammaR) are susceptible to infection with mycobacteria. A heterozygous STAT1 mutation that impairs GAF but not ISGF3 activation has been found in other individuals with mycobacterial disease. No individuals with deleterious mutations in the IFN-alpha/beta signaling pathway have been described. We report here two unrelated infants homozygous with respect to mutated STAT1 alleles. Neither IFN-alpha/beta nor IFN-gamma activated STAT1-containing transcription factors. Like individuals with IFN-gammaR deficiency, both infants suffered from mycobacterial disease, but unlike individuals with IFN-gammaR deficiency, both died of viral disease. Viral multiplication was not inhibited by recombinant IFN-alpha/beta in cell lines from the two individuals. Inherited impairment of the STAT1-dependent response to human IFN-alpha/beta thus results in susceptibility to viral disease.
Effective immunity is dependent on long-surviving memory T cells. Various memory subsets make distinct contributions to immune protection, especially in peripheral infection. It has been suggested that T cells in nonlymphoid tissues are important during local infection, although their relationship with populations in the circulation remains poorly defined. Here we describe a unique memory T cell subset present after acute infection with herpes simplex virus that remained resident in the skin and in latently infected sensory ganglia. These T cells were in disequilibrium with the circulating lymphocyte pool and controlled new infection with this virus. Thus, these cells represent an example of tissue-resident memory T cells that can provide protective immunity at points of pathogen entry.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and type 2 are common infections worldwide. Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is the cause of most genital herpes and is almost always sexually transmitted. In contrast, HSV-1 is usually transmitted during childhood via nonsexual contacts. Preexisting HSV-1 antibodies can alleviate clinical manifestations of subsequently acquired HSV-2. Furthermore, HSV-1 has become an important cause of genital herpes in some developed countries. To examine trends in HSV-1 and HSV-2 seroprevalence in the United States in 1999-2004 compared with 1988-1994. Cross-sectional, nationally representative surveys (US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys [NHANES]), were used to compare national seroprevalence estimates from 1999-2004 with those from 1988-1994, and changes in HSV-1 and HSV-2 seroprevalence since 1976-1980 were reviewed. Persons aged 14 to 49 years were included in these analyses. Seroprevalence of HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies based on results from type-specific immunodot assays; diagnosis of genital herpes. The overall age-adjusted HSV-2 seroprevalence was 17.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.8%-18.3%) in 1999-2004 and 21.0% (95% CI, 19.1%-23.1%) in 1988-1994, a relative decrease of 19.0% between the 2 surveys (95% CI, -28.6% to -9.5%; P<.001). Decreases in HSV-2 seroprevalence were especially concentrated in persons aged 14 to 19 years between 1988 and 2004. In adolescents aged 17 to 19 years and young adults, the decreases in HSV-2 seroprevalence were significant even after adjusting for changes in sexual behaviors. Among those infected with HSV-2, the percentage who reported having been diagnosed with genital herpes was statistically different (14.3% in 1999-2004 and 9.9% in 1988-1994; P = .02). Seroprevalence of HSV-1 decreased from 62.0% (95% CI, 59.6%-64.6%) in 1988-1994 to 57.7% (95% CI, 55.9%-59.5%) in 1999-2004, a relative decrease of 6.9% between the 2 surveys (95% CI, -11.6% to -2.3%; P = .006). Among persons infected with HSV-1 but not with HSV-2, a higher percentage reported having been diagnosed with genital herpes in 1999-2004 compared with 1988-1994 (1.8% vs 0.4%, respectively; P<.001). These data show declines in HSV-2 seroprevalence, suggesting that the trajectory of increasing HSV-2 seroprevalence in the United States has been reversed. Seroprevalence of HSV-1 decreased but the incidence of genital herpes caused by HSV-1 may be increasing.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.