Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lipidomic risk score independently and cost-effectively predicts risk of future type 2 diabetes: results from diverse cohorts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Detection of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is routinely based on the presence of dysglycemia. Although disturbed lipid metabolism is a hallmark of T2D, the potential of plasma lipidomics as a biomarker of future T2D is unknown. Our objective was to develop and validate a plasma lipidomic risk score (LRS) as a biomarker of future type 2 diabetes and to evaluate its cost-effectiveness for T2D screening.

          Methods

          Plasma LRS, based on significantly associated lipid species from an array of 319 lipid species, was developed in a cohort of initially T2D-free individuals from the San Antonio Family Heart Study (SAFHS). The LRS derived from SAFHS as well as its recalibrated version were validated in an independent cohort from Australia – the AusDiab cohort. The participants were T2D-free at baseline and followed for 9197 person-years in the SAFHS cohort ( n = 771) and 5930 person-years in the AusDiab cohort ( n = 644). Statistically and clinically improved T2D prediction was evaluated with established statistical parameters in both cohorts. Modeling studies were conducted to determine whether the use of LRS would be cost-effective for T2D screening. The main outcome measures included accuracy and incremental value of the LRS over routinely used clinical predictors of T2D risk; validation of these results in an independent cohort and cost-effectiveness of including LRS in screening/intervention programs for T2D.

          Results

          The LRS was based on plasma concentration of dihydroceramide 18:0, lysoalkylphosphatidylcholine 22:1 and triacyglycerol 16:0/18:0/18:1. The score predicted future T2D independently of prediabetes with an accuracy of 76 %. Even in the subset of initially euglycemic individuals, the LRS improved T2D prediction. In the AusDiab cohort, the LRS continued to predict T2D significantly and independently. When combined with risk-stratification methods currently used in clinical practice, the LRS significantly improved the model fit ( p < 0.001), information content ( p < 0.001), discrimination ( p < 0.001) and reclassification ( p < 0.001) in both cohorts. Modeling studies demonstrated that LRS-based risk-stratification combined with metformin supplementation for high-risk individuals was the most cost-effective strategy for T2D prevention.

          Conclusions

          Considering the novelty, incremental value and cost-effectiveness of LRS it should be used for risk-stratification of future T2D.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12944-016-0234-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

            A representation and interpretation of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve obtained by the "rating" method, or by mathematical predictions based on patient characteristics, is presented. It is shown that in such a setting the area represents the probability that a randomly chosen diseased subject is (correctly) rated or ranked with greater suspicion than a randomly chosen non-diseased subject. Moreover, this probability of a correct ranking is the same quantity that is estimated by the already well-studied nonparametric Wilcoxon statistic. These two relationships are exploited to (a) provide rapid closed-form expressions for the approximate magnitude of the sampling variability, i.e., standard error that one uses to accompany the area under a smoothed ROC curve, (b) guide in determining the size of the sample required to provide a sufficiently reliable estimate of this area, and (c) determine how large sample sizes should be to ensure that one can statistically detect differences in the accuracy of diagnostic techniques.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans.

              Insulin resistance plays an important role in the pathophysiology of diabetes and is associated with obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors. The "gold standard" glucose clamp and minimal model analysis are two established methods for determining insulin sensitivity in vivo, but neither is easily implemented in large studies. Thus, it is of interest to develop a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity that is useful for clinical investigations. We performed both hyperinsulinemic isoglycemic glucose clamp and insulin-modified frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance tests on 28 nonobese, 13 obese, and 15 type 2 diabetic subjects. We obtained correlations between indexes of insulin sensitivity from glucose clamp studies (SI(Clamp)) and minimal model analysis (SI(MM)) that were comparable to previous reports (r = 0.57). We performed a sensitivity analysis on our data and discovered that physiological steady state values [i.e. fasting insulin (I(0)) and glucose (G(0))] contain critical information about insulin sensitivity. We defined a quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI = 1/[log(I(0)) + log(G(0))]) that has substantially better correlation with SI(Clamp) (r = 0.78) than the correlation we observed between SI(MM) and SI(Clamp). Moreover, we observed a comparable overall correlation between QUICKI and SI(Clamp) in a totally independent group of 21 obese and 14 nonobese subjects from another institution. We conclude that QUICKI is an index of insulin sensitivity obtained from a fasting blood sample that may be useful for clinical research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (956) 882 7511 , manju.mamtani@utrgv.edu
                hemant.kulkarni@utrgv.edu
                gerard_wong@sics.a-star.edu.sg
                jacqui.weir@bakeridi.edu.au
                chris.barlow@monash.edu
                thomas.dyer@utrgv.edu
                laura.almasy@utrgv.edu
                michael.mahaney@utrgv.edu
                tony@txbiomedgenetics.org
                david.glahn@yale.edu
                dianna.magliano@bakeridi.edu.au
                paul.zimmet@bakeridi.edu.au
                jonathan.shaw@bakeridi.edu.au
                sarah.williams-blangero@utrgv.edu
                ravindranath.duggirala@utrgv.edu
                john.blangero@utrgv.edu
                peter.meikle@bakeridi.edu.au
                joanne.curran@utrgv.edu
                Journal
                Lipids Health Dis
                Lipids Health Dis
                Lipids in Health and Disease
                BioMed Central (London )
                1476-511X
                4 April 2016
                4 April 2016
                2016
                : 15
                : 67
                Affiliations
                [ ]South Texas Diabetes and Obesity Institute, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Brownsville, TX 78520 USA
                [ ]Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia
                [ ]Department of Genetics, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX USA
                [ ]Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
                [ ]Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, 200 Retreat Avenue, New Haven, CT USA
                Article
                234
                10.1186/s12944-016-0234-3
                4820916
                27044508
                b43b04bc-7ce7-4905-9aef-531b85594af8
                © Mamtani et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 8 January 2016
                : 24 March 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: National Insitutes of Health
                Award ID: R01 DK082610, R01 DK079169, R01 HL045522, R01 MH078143, R01 MH078111, R01 MH083824, R37 MH059490
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
                Award ID: #233200 and #1007544
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000062, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases;
                Award ID: 1R01DK088972-01
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: OIS Program Victorian Government, Australia
                Award ID: ---
                Funded by: Dairy Health and Nutrition Consortium
                Award ID: ---
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Biochemistry
                diabetes,endocrine disorders,lipidomics,diagnostic tools,genetics
                Biochemistry
                diabetes, endocrine disorders, lipidomics, diagnostic tools, genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article