0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      NET formation is independent of gasdermin D and pyroptotic cell death

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are DNA scaffolds coated with granule proteins that are released by neutrophils to ensnare and kill bacteria. NET formation occurs in response to many stimuli through independent molecular pathways. Although NET release has been equated to a form of lytic cell death, live neutrophils can rapidly release antimicrobial NETs. Gasdermin D (GSDMD), which causes pyroptotic death in macrophages, is thought to be required for NET formation by neutrophils. Through experiments with known physiological activators of NET formation and ligands that activate canonical and noncanonical inflammasome signaling pathways, we demonstrated that Gsdmd -deficient mouse neutrophils were as competent as wild-type mouse neutrophils in producing NETs. Furthermore, GSDMD was not cleaved in wild-type neutrophils during NET release in response to inflammatory mediators. We found that activation of both canonical and noncanonical inflammasome signaling pathways resulted in GSDMD cleavage in wild-type neutrophils but was not associated with cell death. Moreover, NET formation as a result of either pathway of inflammasome activation did not require GSDMD. Together, these data suggest that NETs can be formed by viable neutrophils after inflammasome activation and that this function does not require GSDMD.

          Abstract

          The formation of neutrophil extracellular traps requires neither cell death nor the pore-forming protein gasdermin D.

          Casting NETs without dying

          Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are formed by neutrophils in response to various microbial agents and noninfectious stimuli and bind to and kill microbes. Both defective and exaggerated NET formation contribute to various disorders, making it critical to better understand the mechanisms underlying NET formation. Stojkov et al . found that agonists that induced NET formation independently of multiprotein complexes called inflammasomes did not require the protein gasdermin D (GSDMD) and did not cause cell lysis, contrary to previous studies. Furthermore, the authors found that although canonical and noncanonical inflammasome activation caused GSDMD processing, it was not required for NET release. These data suggest that the mechanisms leading to NET formation require further study and should be distinguished from those that lead to cell death.—JFF

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018

          Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the field continues to expand and novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple cell death pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification of cell death subroutines focusing on mechanistic and essential (as opposed to correlative and dispensable) aspects of the process. As we provide molecularly oriented definitions of terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, NETotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, cellular senescence, and mitotic catastrophe, we discuss the utility of neologisms that refer to highly specialized instances of these processes. The mission of the NCCD is to provide a widely accepted nomenclature on cell death in support of the continued development of the field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death.

            Inflammatory caspases (caspase-1, -4, -5 and -11) are critical for innate defences. Caspase-1 is activated by ligands of various canonical inflammasomes, and caspase-4, -5 and -11 directly recognize bacterial lipopolysaccharide, both of which trigger pyroptosis. Despite the crucial role in immunity and endotoxic shock, the mechanism for pyroptosis induction by inflammatory caspases is unknown. Here we identify gasdermin D (Gsdmd) by genome-wide clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9 nuclease screens of caspase-11- and caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis in mouse bone marrow macrophages. GSDMD-deficient cells resisted the induction of pyroptosis by cytosolic lipopolysaccharide and known canonical inflammasome ligands. Interleukin-1β release was also diminished in Gsdmd(-/-) cells, despite intact processing by caspase-1. Caspase-1 and caspase-4/5/11 specifically cleaved the linker between the amino-terminal gasdermin-N and carboxy-terminal gasdermin-C domains in GSDMD, which was required and sufficient for pyroptosis. The cleavage released the intramolecular inhibition on the gasdermin-N domain that showed intrinsic pyroptosis-inducing activity. Other gasdermin family members were not cleaved by inflammatory caspases but shared the autoinhibition; gain-of-function mutations in Gsdma3 that cause alopecia and skin defects disrupted the autoinhibition, allowing its gasdermin-N domain to trigger pyroptosis. These findings offer insight into inflammasome-mediated immunity/diseases and also change our understanding of pyroptosis and programmed necrosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria.

              Neutrophils engulf and kill bacteria when their antimicrobial granules fuse with the phagosome. Here, we describe that, upon activation, neutrophils release granule proteins and chromatin that together form extracellular fibers that bind Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. These neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) degrade virulence factors and kill bacteria. NETs are abundant in vivo in experimental dysentery and spontaneous human appendicitis, two examples of acute inflammation. NETs appear to be a form of innate response that binds microorganisms, prevents them from spreading, and ensures a high local concentration of antimicrobial agents to degrade virulence factors and kill bacteria.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Science Signaling
                Sci. Signal.
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                1945-0877
                1937-9145
                January 24 2023
                January 24 2023
                : 16
                : 769
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
                [2 ]Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
                [3 ]Institute of Virology and Immunology, Mittelhäusern, Switzerland.
                [4 ]Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
                [5 ]Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
                [6 ]Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
                [7 ]Institute of Biochemistry, Medical School Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Germany.
                Article
                10.1126/scisignal.abm0517
                36693132
                b3825d9c-800f-4f6b-83d3-1ff473231dea
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article