3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of healthcare resources in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction/objectives

          The objective of this study is to describe the treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources in a cohort of Colombian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or tofacitinib.

          Method

          This is a descriptive study from a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with RA who were treated with bDMARDs or tofacitinib after failure of conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) or first bDMARD. Patients who were receiving pharmacological treatment between 01 January 2014 and 30 June 2018 were included. The analysis is through the revision of claim database and electronical medical records. Demographic and clinical data were collected. The costs of healthcare resources were estimated from the billing expense of healthcare service provider.

          Results

          We evaluated 588 RA patients on treatment with bDMARDs ( n = 505) or tofacitinib ( n = 83), most of them were in combination with cDMARDs (85.4%). The 88.1% were females and mean age was 57.3 ± 12.5 years. The median evolution of RA since diagnosis was 9 years (IQR:4–17.2). The mean duration of use during follow-up of the bDMARDs or tofacitinib was similar, with a mean of 9.8 ± 1.9 months. It was identified that 394 (67.0%) discontinued therapy. The average annual direct cost of care per patient was USD 8997 ± 2172, where 97.2% was due to drug costs. The average annual cost of treatment per patient with bDMARDs was USD 8604 and tofacitinib was USD 6377.

          Conclusions

          In the face of a first failure of cDMARD, bDMARDs are frequently added. A high frequency of patients do not persist treatment during the first year of follow-up. The pharmacological treatment is the most representative cause of healthcare costs.

          Key Points

          • Rheumatoid arthritis is a disease with a high burden of comorbidities, complications, and worse health-related quality of life and is associated with elevated healthcare costs .

          • The biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib medications are indicated for those with significant progression of the disease and when there is a need for alternatives to achieve low levels of activity and remission .

          • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib represent a significant economic burden to the health system, especially in the costs derived from pharmacological treatment .

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rheumatoid arthritis.

          Rheumatoid arthritis is characterised by persistent synovitis, systemic inflammation, and autoantibodies (particularly to rheumatoid factor and citrullinated peptide). 50% of the risk for development of rheumatoid arthritis is attributable to genetic factors. Smoking is the main environmental risk. In industrialised countries, rheumatoid arthritis affects 0·5-1·0% of adults, with 5-50 per 100 000 new cases annually. The disorder is most typical in women and elderly people. Uncontrolled active rheumatoid arthritis causes joint damage, disability, decreased quality of life, and cardiovascular and other comorbidities. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), the key therapeutic agents, reduce synovitis and systemic inflammation and improve function. The leading DMARD is methotrexate, which can be combined with other drugs of this type. Biological agents are used when arthritis is uncontrolled or toxic effects arise with DMARDs. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors were the first biological agents, followed by abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Infections and high costs restrict prescription of biological agents. Long-term remission induced by intensive, short-term treatment selected by biomarker profiles is the ultimate goal. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

            To develop a new evidence-based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases.

              Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the methods currently being used to assess adherence and persistence in pharmacoepidemiological and pharmacoeconomic studies using automated databases. A MEDLINE search of English language literature was performed to identify studies published between January 1, 1980 and March 31, 2004 that evaluated adherence, compliance, persistence, switching, or discontinuations of medications using automated dispensing data (pharmacy records). Two study investigators independently reviewed the abstracts and articles to determine relevant studies according to specified criteria. A total of 136 articles met the criteria for evaluation. The types of measures of adherence and persistence commonly reported include the medication possession ratio and related measures of medication availability (77 studies), discontinuation/continuation (58 studies), switching (34 studies), medication gaps (13 studies), refill compliance (7 studies), and retentiveness/turbulence (4 studies). Specific issues considered include the assessment of exposed time to drug therapy and specification of the follow-up period. The terminology, definitions, and methods to determine adherence and persistence differ greatly in the published literature. The appropriateness and choice of the specific measure employed should be determined by the overall goals of the study, as well as the relative advantages and limitations of the measures. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                machado@utp.edu.co
                Journal
                Clin Rheumatol
                Clin Rheumatol
                Clinical Rheumatology
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0770-3198
                1434-9949
                30 September 2020
                30 September 2020
                2021
                : 40
                : 4
                : 1273-1281
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412256.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2176 1069, Grupo de Investigación de Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, , Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira - Audifarma SA, ; Pereira, Colombia 660003
                [2 ]GRID grid.441853.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0418 3510, Grupo Biomedicina, Facultad de Medicina, , Fundación Universitaria Autonoma de las Américas, ; Pereira, Colombia
                [3 ]Pfizer of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-0936
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-0986
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-7658
                Article
                5432
                10.1007/s10067-020-05432-6
                7943490
                32997316
                ae86dea7-c200-4037-a61c-d06b2f0a1fbd
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 September 2020
                : 23 September 2020
                : 24 September 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Pfizer de Colombia
                Award ID: 0017
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2021

                Rheumatology
                antirheumatic agents,biologic drugs,disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs,healthcare cost,rheumatoid arthritis

                Comments

                Comment on this article