49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

      review-article
      a , b , , c , b , b , d , e , f , a , g , h , i , j , k , l
      Sleep Medicine Reviews
      Elsevier Ltd.
      sleep disorder, sleep disturbance, pandemic, insomnia, sleep hygiene, circadian rhythm, AIS, Athens insomnia scale, Decimal, data extraction for complicated meta-analysis, DOI, digital object identification, GOSH, Graphic display of study heterogeneity, IPD, individual patient data, ISI, Insomnia severity index, MeSH, Medical Subjects Headings, NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Prisma, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the extent of sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eleven databases and six preprint repositories were searched for the period from November 1, 2019, to July 15, 2021. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to develop random-effect meta-analyses. Two hundred and fifty studies comprising 493,475 participants from 49 countries were included. During COVID-19, the estimated global prevalence of sleep disturbances was 40.49% [37.56; 43.48%]. Bayesian meta-analysis revealed an odds of 0.68 [0.59; 0.77] which translates to a rate of approximately 41%. This provides reassurance that the estimated rate using classical meta-analysis is robust. Six major populations were identified; the estimated prevalence of sleep problem was 52.39% [41.69; 62.88%] among patients infected with COVID-19, 45.96% [36.90; 55.30%] among children and adolescents, 42.47% [37.95; 47.12%] among healthcare workers, 41.50% [32.98; 50.56%] among special populations with healthcare needs, 41.16% [28.76; 54.79%] among university students, and 36.73% [32.32; 41.38%] among the general population. Sleep disturbances were higher during lockdown compared to no lockdown, 42.49% versus 37.97%. Four in every ten individuals reported a sleep problem during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients infected with the disease, children, and adolescents appeared to be the most affected groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references284

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

              The extent of heterogeneity in a meta-analysis partly determines the difficulty in drawing overall conclusions. This extent may be measured by estimating a between-study variance, but interpretation is then specific to a particular treatment effect metric. A test for the existence of heterogeneity exists, but depends on the number of studies in the meta-analysis. We develop measures of the impact of heterogeneity on a meta-analysis, from mathematical criteria, that are independent of the number of studies and the treatment effect metric. We derive and propose three suitable statistics: H is the square root of the chi2 heterogeneity statistic divided by its degrees of freedom; R is the ratio of the standard error of the underlying mean from a random effects meta-analysis to the standard error of a fixed effect meta-analytic estimate, and I2 is a transformation of (H) that describes the proportion of total variation in study estimates that is due to heterogeneity. We discuss interpretation, interval estimates and other properties of these measures and examine them in five example data sets showing different amounts of heterogeneity. We conclude that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity. One or both should be presented in published meta-analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sleep Med Rev
                Sleep Med Rev
                Sleep Medicine Reviews
                Elsevier Ltd.
                1087-0792
                1532-2955
                22 January 2022
                22 January 2022
                : 101591
                Affiliations
                [a ]Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Bahrain
                [b ]College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain
                [c ]Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan
                [d ]The Tunisian Center of Early Intervention in Psychosis, Psychiatry Department "Ibn Omrane", Tunisia
                [e ]Tunis El Manar University, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunisia
                [f ]Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [g ]Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Canada
                [h ]Somnogen Canada Inc., College Street, Toronto, Canada
                [i ]Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
                [j ]Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University Sleep Disorders Center, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
                [k ]The Strategic Technologies Program of the National Plan for Sciences and Technology and Innovation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [l ]Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, and Biobehavioral Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195-6560, United States
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, P.O. Box: 26671, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.
                Article
                S1087-0792(22)00004-1 101591
                10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101591
                8782754
                35131664
                adefe881-9cbc-41d1-a8ea-3bdbc0adb078
                © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 24 August 2021
                : 15 November 2021
                : 11 January 2022
                Categories
                Clinical Review

                sleep disorder,sleep disturbance,pandemic,insomnia,sleep hygiene,circadian rhythm,ais, athens insomnia scale,decimal, data extraction for complicated meta-analysis,doi, digital object identification,gosh, graphic display of study heterogeneity,ipd, individual patient data,isi, insomnia severity index,mesh, medical subjects headings,nos, newcastle-ottawa scale,prisma, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses,psqi, pittsburgh sleep quality index

                Comments

                Comment on this article