11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Mortality in pregnancy and the postpartum period in women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome related to COVID‐19 in Brazil, 2020

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To estimate fatality rates due to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID‐19 in Brazilian women, comparing pregnant and postpartum women with nonpregnant women.

          Methods

          A cross‐sectional study of 12 566 pregnant and postpartum women (obstetric group) and 90 025 nonpregnant women (nonobstetric group) aged 15–49 years reported with severe ARDS in 2020. The Brazilian ARDS Surveillance System was used to compare the outcome (death or cure) between the groups, considering age, race, or comorbidities.

          Results

          The mortality rate related to ARDS/COVID‐19 in the obstetric group was 7.8% (377/4853) compared with 13.9% (5946/42 915) in the nonobstetric group. Comorbidity was associated with increased fatality cases for both groups, but higher in the nonobstetric group (22.8% vs 13.3%). In the obstetric group, deaths related to COVID‐19 were concentrated in the third trimester or postpartum period. If comorbidity was present, deaths by COVID‐19 were 4.4 times higher than ARDS due to other etiologies, and twice higher in women who self‐reported as black (13.7%) than white women (6.7%). Considering ADRS etiology, deaths by COVID‐19 were 3.4–6.7 times higher than any other etiology.

          Conclusion

          ARDS related to COVID‐19 in obstetric patients was an important factor for worse clinical outcomes, with 3–6 times higher death rates than other ARDS etiologies. Pregnant and postpartum women with severe ARDS related to COVID‐19 had a lower fatality rate than nonpregnant women, even with associated comorbidity.

          Synopsis

          The mortality rate among pregnant and postpartum women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID‐19 in Brazil in 2020 was significant but lower than in nonpregnant women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Characterisation of the first 250 000 hospital admissions for COVID-19 in Brazil: a retrospective analysis of nationwide data

          Background Most low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) have little or no data integrated into a national surveillance system to identify characteristics or outcomes of COVID-19 hospital admissions and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their national health systems. We aimed to analyse characteristics of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in Brazil, and to examine the impact of COVID-19 on health-care resources and in-hospital mortality. Methods We did a retrospective analysis of all patients aged 20 years or older with quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR)-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to hospital and registered in SIVEP-Gripe, a nationwide surveillance database in Brazil, between Feb 16 and Aug 15, 2020 (epidemiological weeks 8–33). We also examined the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic across three 4-week periods within this timeframe (epidemiological weeks 8–12, 19–22, and 27–30). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We compared the regional burden of hospital admissions stratified by age, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and respiratory support. We analysed data from the whole country and its five regions: North, Northeast, Central-West, Southeast, and South. Findings Between Feb 16 and Aug 15, 2020, 254 288 patients with RT-qPCR-confirmed COVID-19 were admitted to hospital and registered in SIVEP-Gripe. The mean age of patients was 60 (SD 17) years, 119 657 (47%) of 254 288 were aged younger than 60 years, 143 521 (56%) of 254 243 were male, and 14 979 (16%) of 90 829 had no comorbidities. Case numbers increased across the three 4-week periods studied: by epidemiological weeks 19–22, cases were concentrated in the North, Northeast, and Southeast; by weeks 27–30, cases had spread to the Central-West and South regions. 232 036 (91%) of 254 288 patients had a defined hospital outcome when the data were exported; in-hospital mortality was 38% (87 515 of 232 036 patients) overall, 59% (47 002 of 79 687) among patients admitted to the ICU, and 80% (36 046 of 45 205) among those who were mechanically ventilated. The overall burden of ICU admissions per ICU beds was more pronounced in the North, Southeast, and Northeast, than in the Central-West and South. In the Northeast, 1545 (16%) of 9960 patients received invasive mechanical ventilation outside the ICU compared with 431 (8%) of 5388 in the South. In-hospital mortality among patients younger than 60 years was 31% (4204 of 13 468) in the Northeast versus 15% (1694 of 11 196) in the South. Interpretation We observed a widespread distribution of COVID-19 across all regions in Brazil, resulting in a high overall disease burden. In-hospital mortality was high, even in patients younger than 60 years, and worsened by existing regional disparities within the health system. The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need to improve access to high-quality care for critically ill patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, particularly in LMICs. Funding National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Coordinating Agency for Advanced Training of Graduate Personnel (CAPES), Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and Instituto de Salud Carlos III.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Comparative Review of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and Influenza A Respiratory Viruses

            The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has caused a global health emergency. The outbreak of this virus has raised a number of questions: What is SARS-CoV-2? How transmissible is SARS-CoV-2? How severely affected are patients infected with SARS-CoV-2? What are the risk factors for viral infection? What are the differences between this novel coronavirus and other coronaviruses? To answer these questions, we performed a comparative study of four pathogenic viruses that primarily attack the respiratory system and may cause death, namely, SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), and influenza A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2 strains). This comparative study provides a critical evaluation of the origin, genomic features, transmission, and pathogenicity of these viruses. Because the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 is ongoing, this evaluation may inform public health administrators and medical experts to aid in curbing the pandemic's progression.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The tragedy of COVID‐19 in Brazil: 124 maternal deaths and counting

              At the time of writing 124 pregnant or postpartum women in Brazil have died due to COVID‐19 (representing a mortality rate of 12.7%), a figure that currently surpasses the total number of COVID‐19‐related maternal deaths reported throughout the rest of the world.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                juliotex@unicamp.br , juliotex10@gmail.com
                Journal
                Int J Gynaecol Obstet
                Int J Gynaecol Obstet
                10.1002/(ISSN)1879-3479
                IJGO
                International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0020-7292
                1879-3479
                16 July 2021
                December 2021
                16 July 2021
                : 155
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/ijgo.v155.3 )
                : 475-482
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Campinas, São Paulo Brazil
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Julio C. Teixeira, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, Women’s Hospital (CAISM), UNICAMP, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101 – Cidade Universitaria, Campinas (SP) 13083‐881, Brazil.

                Email: juliotex@ 123456unicamp.br ; juliotex10@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-376X
                Article
                IJGO13804
                10.1002/ijgo.13804
                9087770
                34185314
                ad8d89c0-c76c-4fe0-aafc-cea3fcecec44
                © 2021 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 17 June 2021
                : 15 April 2021
                : 20 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Pages: 8, Words: 4970
                Categories
                Clinical Article
                Clinical Articles
                Obstetrics
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.5 mode:remove_FC converted:10.05.2022

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                acute respiratory distress syndrome,case fatality,coronavirus,covid‐19,maternal death,maternal mortality,mortality rate,pregnancy,sars‐cov‐2

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content176

                Cited by21

                Most referenced authors391