7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic review of surveillance systems for AMR in Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Surveillance is a useful tool for tracking antimicrobial resistance (AMR) trends, patterns, therapeutic and policy interventions. Proper correlation of surveillance data gives meaningful insight into the underlying epidemiology and facilitates development of rational interventions. This comprehensive review aims to identify, classify and assess gaps in Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) reporting and national action plan (NAP) implementation in Africa.

          Methods

          Articles published in English were searched across five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, AJOL and Cochrane) and grey literature. Articles were screened against inclusion/exclusion criteria and data from eligible studies were retrieved and analysed. This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 31 July 2020 under protocol CRD42020192165.

          Results

          Of the 4304 records found, only 32 met the initial inclusion criteria (4 peer reviews and 28 were grey literature). From these records, 41 surveillance systems were identified (30 national and 11 transnational). After final review of reported outcomes, only 23 national surveillance systems met the inclusion criteria. Indicators recorded from these systems shows lack of external quality assessment (EQA) in some systems and limited reporting of parameters such as infection origin, patient population and pathogen types.

          Conclusions

          The outcome of the review shows that although AMR surveillance has been implemented in 23 out of the 47 countries in the region, a number of limitations exist in the surveillance methods and reporting protocols that can impair the usefulness, validity and trustworthiness of data generated from these surveillance systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

          The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

            In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used. This article describes the development of the SWiM guideline for the synthesis of quantitative data of intervention effects and presents the nine SWiM reporting items with accompanying explanations and examples.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.

              With the increase in the number of systematic reviews available, a logical next step to provide decision makers in healthcare with the evidence they require has been the conduct of reviews of existing systematic reviews. Syntheses of existing systematic reviews are referred to by many different names, one of which is an umbrella review. An umbrella review allows the findings of reviews relevant to a review question to be compared and contrasted. An umbrella review's most characteristic feature is that this type of evidence synthesis only considers for inclusion the highest level of evidence, namely other systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A methodology working group was formed by the Joanna Briggs Institute to develop methodological guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review, including diverse types of evidence, both quantitative and qualitative. The aim of this study is to describe the development and guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Antimicrob Chemother
                J Antimicrob Chemother
                jac
                Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0305-7453
                1460-2091
                January 2023
                13 October 2022
                13 October 2022
                : 78
                : 1
                : 31-51
                Affiliations
                Department of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England Bristol , Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK
                Department of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England Bristol , Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK
                School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol , Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Stapleton, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK
                Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Federal University Oye-Ekiti , Oye-Are Road, Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
                Department of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England Bristol , Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. E-mail: emmanuel.adukwu@ 123456uwe.ac.uk
                Article
                dkac342
                10.1093/jac/dkac342
                9780554
                36227707
                acd3978b-3fa0-45a1-a394-66020a15c1fd
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 08 June 2022
                : 16 September 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 21
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Editor's Choice
                AcademicSubjects/MED00740
                AcademicSubjects/MED00290
                AcademicSubjects/MED00230

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article