22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Outcomes of people with psychotic disorders in a community-based rehabilitation programme in rural India

      research-article
      , MD, DPM , MBBS, MPH , BA, BSW, MSW , PhD , MRCPsych, PhD
      The British Journal of Psychiatry
      Royal College Of Psychiatrists

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is little evidence of the feasibility, acceptability and impact of services for the care of people with psychotic disorders in low- and middle-income countries.

          Aims

          To describe the scaling up and impact of a community-based rehabilitation programme for people with psychotic disorders in a very-low-resource setting.

          Methods

          Longitudinal study of people with psychotic disorders who had been ill for an average of 8 years in a rural Indian community. All individuals received a community-based intervention package comprising psychotropic medications, psychoeducation, adherence management, psychosocial rehabilitation and support for livelihoods. The primary outcome was change in disability scores.

          Results

          The cohort consisted of 256 people with psychotic disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder and other psychosis) of whom 236 people completed the end-point assessments (92%), with a median follow-up of 46 months. There were significant reductions ( P<0.05) in the levels of disability for the cohort, the vast majority (83.5%) of whom engaged with the programme. On multivariate analyses, lower baseline disability scores, family engagement with the programme, medication adherence and being a member of a self-help group were independent determinants of good outcomes. Lack of formal education, a diagnosis of schizophrenia and dropping out of the programme were independent determinants of poor outcomes.

          Conclusions

          Community-based rehabilitation is a feasible and acceptable intervention with a beneficial impact on disability for the majority of people with psychotic disorders in low-resource settings. The impact on disability is influenced by a combination of clinical, programme and social determinants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rethinking social recovery in schizophrenia: what a capabilities approach might offer.

          Kim Hopper (2007)
          Resurgent hopes for recovery from schizophrenia in the late 1980s had less to do with fresh empirical evidence than with focused political agitation. Recovery's promise was transformative: reworking traditional power relationships, conferring distinctive expertise on service users, rewriting the mandate of public mental health systems. Its institutional imprint has been considerably weaker. This article takes sympathetic measure of that outcome and provides an alternative framework for what recovery might mean, one drawn from disability studies and Sen's capabilities approach. By re-enfranchising agency, redressing material and symbolic disadvantage, raising the bar on fundamental entitlements and claiming institutional support for complex competencies, a capabilities approach could convert flaccid doctrine into useful guidelines and tools for public mental health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation model for chronic schizophrenia in rural India.

            There are no community services for the majority of the estimated 10 million persons with schizophrenia in India. Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a model of care which has been widely used for physical disabilities in resource-poor settings. To compare CBR with out-patient care (OPC) for schizophrenia in a resource-poor setting in India. A longitudinal study of outcome in patients with chronic schizophrenia contrasted CBR with OPC. Outcome measures were assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale and the modified WHO Disability Assessment Schedule at 12 months. Altogether, 207 participants entered the study, 127 in the CBR group and 80 in the OPC group. Among the 117 fully compliant participants the CBR model was more effective in reducing disability, especially in men. Within the CBR group, compliant participants had significantly better outcomes compared with partially compliant or non-complaint participants (P<0.001). Although the subjects in the CBR group were more socially disadvantaged, they had significantly better retention in treatment. The CBR model is a feasible model of care for chronic schizophrenia in resource-poor settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Twenty-year course of schizophrenia: the Madras Longitudinal Study.

              R. Thara (2004)
              To follow up 90 first-episode schizophrenia patients after 20 years and to study the course of symptomatology, work, social functioning, and pattern of illness during this period. The Present State Examination and the Psychiatric and Personal History Schedule were administered at fixed points during follow-up. The measures adopted to ensure a good follow-up rate (67%) after 20 years under adverse conditions are described. Complete data were obtained from 61 subjects; 16 had died, and 13 could not be traced. After 20 years, 5 patients had recovered completely, and another 5 were continuously ill. Most of the cohort had multiple relapses with or without complete remission between them. The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale showed that symptoms and social functioning in this sample approximated results from developing countries and were much better than those of developed nations. There were not many sex differences. Marriage and occupational rates were higher than those observed in many published reports. This is one of the few long-term follow-up studies from the developing world. It reveals a pattern of course and functioning distinctly better than that found in many such studies from the developed nations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Psychiatry
                bjprcpsych
                bjp
                The British Journal of Psychiatry
                Royal College Of Psychiatrists
                0007-1250
                1472-1465
                November 2009
                November 2009
                : 195
                : 5
                : 433-439
                Affiliations
                Sangath, Goa, India, and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
                Sangath, Goa, India, and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
                Centre for Behavioural and Social Sciences in Medicine, Department of Medicine, University College London, UK
                Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachussetts, USA
                Sangath, Goa, India, and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
                Author notes
                Professor Vikram Patel, Sangath Centre, Porvorim, Goa, India 403521. Email: vikram.patel@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk
                Article
                0433
                10.1192/bjp.bp.108.057596
                2806571
                19880934
                ac9c425e-4263-4483-bc0a-93d08b4864a0
                Royal College of Psychiatrists

                This paper accords with the Wellcome Trust Open Access policy and is governed by the licence available at http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Wellcome%20Trust%20licence.pdf

                History
                : 22 July 2008
                : 25 May 2009
                : 17 June 2009
                Categories
                Papers

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article