3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognostic value of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score among critically ill medical and surgical patients with suspected infection in a resource-limited setting

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is a simple bedside tool validated outside of the intensive care unit (ICU) to identify patients with suspected infection who are at risk for poor outcomes.

          Objectives

          To assess qSOFA at the time of ICU referral as a mortality prognosticator in adult medical v. surgical patients with suspected infection admitted to an ICU in a resource-limited regional hospital in South Africa (SA)

          Methods

          We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult medical or surgical patients that were admitted to an ICU in a resource-limited hospital in SA. We performed univariate and multivariable logistic regression and compared nested models using likelihood ratio test, and we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

          Results

          We recruited a total of 1 162 (medical n=283 and surgical n=875) participants in the study who were admitted to the ICU with suspected infection. qSOFA at the time of ICU referral was highly associated with but poorly discriminant of in-ICU mortality among medical (odds ratio (OR) 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 - 5.71; p=0.02; AUROC 0.60; 95% CI 0.53 - 0.67; p=0.02) and surgical (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.73-4.36; p<0.001; AUROC 0.60; 95% CI 0.55 - 0.65; p=0.04) patients. qSOFA model performance was similar between medical and surgical subgroups (p≥0.26). Addition of qSOFA to a baseline risk factor model including age, sex, and HIV status improved the model discrimination in both subgroups (medical AUROC 0.64; 95% CI 0.56 - 0.71; p=0.049; surgical AUROC 0.69; 95% CI 0.64 - 0.74; p<0.0001).

          Conclusion

          qSOFA was highly associated with, but poorly discriminant for, poor outcomes among medical and surgical patients with suspected infection admitted to the ICU in a resource-limited setting. These findings suggest that qSOFA may be useful as a tool to identify patients at increased risk of mortality in these populations and in this context.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

          Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

            This paper presents the form and validation results of APACHE II, a severity of disease classification system. APACHE II uses a point score based upon initial values of 12 routine physiologic measurements, age, and previous health status to provide a general measure of severity of disease. An increasing score (range 0 to 71) was closely correlated with the subsequent risk of hospital death for 5815 intensive care admissions from 13 hospitals. This relationship was also found for many common diseases. When APACHE II scores are combined with an accurate description of disease, they can prognostically stratify acutely ill patients and assist investigators comparing the success of new or differing forms of therapy. This scoring index can be used to evaluate the use of hospital resources and compare the efficacy of intensive care in different hospitals or over time.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

              The Third International Consensus Definitions Task Force defined sepsis as "life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection." The performance of clinical criteria for this sepsis definition is unknown.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med
                Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med
                AJTCCM
                PMCID
                African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine
                South African Medical Association (Pretoria, South Africa )
                2617-0191
                2617-0205
                31 December 2021
                2021
                : 27
                : 4
                : 10.7196/AJTCCM.2021.v27i4.158
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
                [2 ] Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
                [3 ] Adult Intensive Care Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [4 ] Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [5 ] Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: L A Bishop - leesabishop@ 123456gmail.com

                Declaration: None.

                Author Contributions: LAB, DW, RDW, SMS and GLA conceptualised and designed the study. LAB analysed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. GLA performed primary statistical analysis and interpretation of data. DW, RDW and SMS revised the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript for submission.

                Funding: This project was supported by U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS026372) for GLA

                Conflicts of interest: GLA reports receiving fees from UpToDate and for expert witness consulting.

                Article
                10.7196/AJTCCM.2021.v27i4.158
                8948475
                35359693
                ac6fd9fd-f742-41dc-a9b8-c120e1067ecc
                Copyright @ 2021

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 September 2021
                Categories
                Research

                intensive care,sepsis,qsofa,adult,prognosis
                intensive care, sepsis, qsofa, adult, prognosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article