9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      What Drives 15N Spin Relaxation in Disordered Proteins? Combined NMR/MD Study of the H4 Histone Tail

      , , , , ,
      Biophysical Journal
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d499790e161">Backbone ( <sup>15</sup>N) NMR relaxation is one of the main sources of information on dynamics of disordered proteins. Yet, we do not know very well what drives <sup>15</sup>N relaxation in such systems, i.e., how different forms of motion contribute to the measurable relaxation rates. To address this problem, we have investigated, both experimentally and via molecular dynamics simulations, the dynamics of a 26-residue peptide imitating the N-terminal portion of the histone protein H4. One part of the peptide was found to be fully flexible, whereas the other part features some transient structure (a hairpin stabilized by hydrogen bonds). The following motional modes proved relevant for <sup>15</sup>N relaxation. 1) Sub-picosecond librations attenuate relaxation rates according to <i>S</i> <sup>2</sup> ∼0.85–0.90. 2) Axial peptide-plane fluctuations along a stretch of the peptide chain contribute to relaxation-active dynamics on a fast timescale (from tens to hundreds of picoseconds). 3) <i>φ</i>/ <i>ψ</i> backbone jumps contribute to relaxation-active dynamics on both fast (from tens to hundreds of picoseconds) and slow (from hundreds of picoseconds to a nanosecond) timescales. The major contribution is from polyproline II (PPII) ↔ <i>β</i> transitions in the Ramachandran space; in the case of glycine residues, the major contribution is from PPII ↔ ( <i>β</i>) ↔ rPPII transitions, in which rPPII is the mirror-image (right-handed) version of the PPII geometry, whereas <i>β</i> geometry plays the role of an intermediate state. 4) Reorientational motion of certain (sufficiently long-lived) elements of transient structure, i.e., rotational tumbling, contributes to slow relaxation-active dynamics on ∼1-ns timescale (however, it is difficult to isolate this contribution). In conclusion, recent advances in the area of force-field development have made it possible to obtain viable Molecular Dynamics models of protein disorder. After careful validation against the experimental relaxation data, these models can provide a valuable insight into mechanistic origins of spin relaxation in disordered peptides and proteins. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biophysical Journal
          Biophysical Journal
          Elsevier BV
          00063495
          November 2018
          November 2018
          Article
          10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.017
          6302223
          30527335
          aafb881c-7b12-4f32-921d-5b42afa9b798
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article