8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Dysregulation of gene expression as a cause of Cockayne syndrome neurological disease

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Cockayne syndrome (CS) is an autosomal-recessive, multisystem disorder characterized by neurological disease, growth failure, developmental abnormalities, photosensitivity, and degeneration of organ systems such as the ear and eye, including cataracts. Most patients with CS carry mutations in Cockayne syndrome group B (CSB), best known for its role in transcription-coupled repair. Indeed, because various repair pathways are compromised in patient cells, CS is widely considered a genome instability syndrome. Here, we provide evidence from human and mouse cell models, as well as brain tissue from patients with CS, that the involvement of CSB in regulating gene expression can explain several features of CS. Together, our data suggest that dysregulation of gene regulatory networks rather than DNA repair defects may be the main cause of neurological symptoms in CS.

          Abstract

          Cockayne syndrome (CS) is a multisystem disorder with severe neurological symptoms. The majority of CS patients carry mutations in Cockayne syndrome group B (CSB), best known for its role in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair. Indeed, because various repair pathways are compromised in patient cells, CS is widely considered a genome instability syndrome. Here, we investigate the connection between the neuropathology of CS and dysregulation of gene expression. Transcriptome analysis of human fibroblasts revealed that even in the absence of DNA damage, CSB affects the expression of thousands of genes, many of which are neuronal genes. CSB is present in a significant subset of these genes, suggesting that regulation is direct, at the level of transcription. Importantly, reprogramming of CS fibroblasts to neuron-like cells is defective unless an exogenous CSB gene is introduced. Moreover, neuroblastoma cells from which CSB is depleted show defects in gene expression programs required for neuronal differentiation, and fail to differentiate and extend neurites. Likewise, neuron-like cells cannot be maintained without CSB. Finally, a number of disease symptoms may be explained by marked gene expression changes in the brain of patients with CS. Together, these data point to dysregulation of gene regulatory networks as a cause of the neurological symptoms in CS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises.

          Expressed genes are scanned by translocating RNA polymerases, which sensitively detect DNA damage and initiate transcription-coupled repair (TCR), a subpathway of nucleotide excision repair that removes lesions from the template DNA strands of actively transcribed genes. Human hereditary diseases that present a deficiency only in TCR are characterized by sunlight sensitivity without enhanced skin cancer. Although multiple gene products are implicated in TCR, we still lack an understanding of the precise signals that can trigger this pathway. Futile cycles of TCR at naturally occurring non-canonical DNA structures might contribute to genomic instability and genetic disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data

            G Smyth (2005)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A post-transcriptional regulatory switch in polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins reprograms alternative splicing in developing neurons.

              Many metazoan gene transcripts exhibit neuron-specific splicing patterns, but the developmental control of these splicing events is poorly understood. We show that the splicing of a large group of exons is reprogrammed during neuronal development by a switch in expression between two highly similar polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins, PTB and nPTB (neural PTB). PTB is a well-studied regulator of alternative splicing, but nPTB is a closely related paralog whose functional relationship to PTB is unknown. In the brain, nPTB protein is specifically expressed in post-mitotic neurons, whereas PTB is restricted to neuronal precursor cells (NPC), glia, and other nonneuronal cells. Interestingly, nPTB mRNA transcripts are found in NPCs and other nonneuronal cells, but in these cells nPTB protein expression is repressed. This repression is due in part to PTB-induced alternative splicing of nPTB mRNA, leading to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). However, we find that even properly spliced mRNA fails to express nPTB protein when PTB is present, indicating contributions from additional post-transcriptional mechanisms. The PTB-controlled repression of nPTB results in a mutually exclusive pattern of expression in the brain, where the loss of PTB in maturing neurons allows the synthesis of nPTB in these cells. To examine the consequences of this switch, we used splicing-sensitive microarrays to identify different sets of exons regulated by PTB, nPTB, or both proteins. During neuronal differentiation, the splicing of these exon sets is altered as predicted from the observed changes in PTB and nPTB expression. These data show that the post-transcriptional switch from PTB to nPTB controls a widespread alternative splicing program during neuronal development.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                October 07 2014
                September 23 2014
                October 07 2014
                : 111
                : 40
                : 14454-14459
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Mechanisms of Transcription Laboratory, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, South Mimms EN6 3LD, United Kingdom;
                [2 ]Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Group, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London WC2A 3LY, United Kingdom;
                [3 ]Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and Office of Rare Diseases Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
                [4 ]Genetics and Metabolism, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and
                [5 ]Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
                Article
                10.1073/pnas.1412569111
                4210037
                25249633
                aaf68743-4125-441a-bc36-ff4c01c14a43
                © 2014
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article