0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing ecosystem gaseous elemental mercury fluxes over a deciduous and coniferous forest

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sources of neurotoxic mercury in forests are dominated by atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) deposition, but a dearth of direct GEM exchange measurements causes major uncertainties about processes that determine GEM sinks. Here we present three years of forest-level GEM deposition measurements in a coniferous forest and a deciduous forest in northeastern USA, along with flux partitioning into canopy and forest floor contributions. Annual GEM deposition is 13.4 ± 0.80 μg m −2 (coniferous forest) and 25.1 ± 2.4 μg m −2 (deciduous forest) dominating mercury inputs (62 and 76% of total deposition). GEM uptake dominates in daytime during active vegetation periods and correlates with CO 2 assimilation, attributable to plant stomatal uptake of mercury. Non-stomatal GEM deposition occurs in the coniferous canopy during nights and to the forest floor in the deciduous forest and accounts for 24 and 39% of GEM deposition, respectively. Our study shows that GEM deposition includes various pathways and is highly ecosystem-specific, which complicates global constraints of terrestrial GEM sinks.

          Abstract

          Forests are sinks for the neurotoxic mercury, but the sinks have large uncertainties. Our direct gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) exchange measurements show that GEM exchange includes complex patterns of multiple pathways to different ecosystem compartments varying over time

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Seasonal patterns and environmental control of carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange in an ecotonal boreal forest

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution

              Anthropogenic activities have led to large-scale mercury (Hg) pollution in the Arctic. It has been suggested that sea-salt-induced chemical cycling of Hg (through ‘atmospheric mercury depletion events’, or AMDEs) and wet deposition via precipitation are sources of Hg to the Arctic in its oxidized form (Hg(ii)). However, there is little evidence for the occurrence of AMDEs outside of coastal regions, and their importance to net Hg deposition has been questioned. Furthermore, wet-deposition measurements in the Arctic showed some of the lowest levels of Hg deposition via precipitation worldwide, raising questions as to the sources of high Arctic Hg loading. Here we present a comprehensive Hg-deposition mass-balance study, and show that most of the Hg (about 70%) in the interior Arctic tundra is derived from gaseous elemental Hg (Hg(0)) deposition, with only minor contributions from the deposition of Hg(ii) via precipitation or AMDEs. We find that deposition of Hg(0)—the form ubiquitously present in the global atmosphere—occurs throughout the year, and that it is enhanced in summer through the uptake of Hg(0) by vegetation. Tundra uptake of gaseous Hg(0) leads to high soil Hg concentrations, with Hg masses greatly exceeding the levels found in temperate soils. Our concurrent Hg stable isotope measurements in the atmosphere, snowpack, vegetation and soils support our finding that Hg(0) dominates as a source to the tundra. Hg concentration and stable isotope data from an inland-to-coastal transect show high soil Hg concentrations consistently derived from Hg(0), suggesting that the Arctic tundra might be a globally important Hg sink. We suggest that the high tundra soil Hg concentrations might also explain why Arctic rivers annually transport large amounts of Hg to the Arctic Ocean.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                daniel_obrist@uml.edu
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                11 May 2023
                11 May 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 2722
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.225262.3, ISNI 0000 0000 9620 1122, Department of Environmental, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, , University of Massachusetts, ; Lowell, MA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.9227.e, ISNI 0000000119573309, Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, , Chinese Academy of Sciences, ; Nanjing, 210008 China
                [3 ]GRID grid.116068.8, ISNI 0000 0001 2341 2786, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, , Massachusetts Institute of Technology, ; Cambridge, MA USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.497400.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0612 8726, USDA Forest Service, , Northern Research Station, ; Durham, NH USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.21106.34, ISNI 0000000121820794, School of Forest Resources, , University of Maine, ; Orono, ME USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.27860.3b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9684, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, ; Davis, CA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-6808
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-8011
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-4257
                Article
                38225
                10.1038/s41467-023-38225-x
                10175444
                37169778
                aa8d1efb-7320-4a66-901c-8914b3458b67
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 October 2022
                : 21 April 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation (NSF);
                Award ID: 1848212
                Award ID: 2027038
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2023

                Uncategorized
                element cycles,geochemistry
                Uncategorized
                element cycles, geochemistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article