5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What makes palliative care needs “complex”? A multisite sequential explanatory mixed methods study of patients referred for specialist palliative care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Specialist palliative care (SPC) providers tend to use the term ‘complex’ to refer to the needs of patients who require SPC. However, little is known about complex needs on first referral to a SPC service. We examined which needs are present and sought the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the complexity of need on referral to a hospice service.

          Methods

          Multi-site sequential explanatory mixed method study consisting of a case-note review and focus groups with healthcare professionals in four UK hospices.

          Results

          Documentation relating to 239 new patient referrals to hospice was reviewed; and focus groups involving 22 healthcare professionals conducted. Most patients had two or more needs documented on referral (96%); and needs were recorded across two or more domains for 62%. Physical needs were recorded for 91% of patients; psychological needs were recorded for 59%. Spiritual needs were rarely documented. Referral forms were considered limited for capturing complex needs. Referrals were perceived to be influenced by the experience and confidence of the referrer and the local resource available to meet palliative care needs directly.

          Conclusions

          Complexity was hard to detail or to objectively define on referral documentation alone. It appeared to be a term used to describe patients whom primary or secondary care providers felt needed SPC knowledge or support to meet their needs. Hospices need to provide greater clarity regarding who should be referred, when and for what purpose. Education and training in palliative care for primary care nurses and doctors and hospital clinicians could reduce the need for referral and help ensure that hospices are available to those most in need of SPC input.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-020-00700-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

          Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is "saturation." Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept "information power" to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data

            C Pope (2000)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research.

              To assess the quality of mixed methods studies in health services research (HSR). We identified 118 mixed methods studies funded by the Department of Health in England between 1994 and 2004, and obtained proposals and/or final reports for 75. We applied a set of quality questions to both the proposal and report of each study, addressing the success of the study, the mixed methods design, the individual qualitative and quantitative components, the integration between methods and the inferences drawn from completed studies. Most studies were completed successfully. Researchers mainly ignored the mixed methods design and described only the separate components of a study. There was a lack of justification for, and transparency of, the mixed methods design in both proposals and reports, and this had implications for making judgements about the quality of individual components in the context of the design used. There was also a lack of transparency of the individual methods in terms of clear exposition of data collection and analysis, and this was more a problem for the qualitative than the quantitative component: 42% (19/45) versus 18% (8/45) of proposals (p = 0.011). Judgements about integration could rarely be made due to the absence of an attempt at integration of data and findings from different components within a study. The HSR community could improve mixed methods studies by giving more consideration to describing and justifying the design, being transparent about the qualitative component, and attempting to integrate data and findings from the individual components.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anne.finucane@mariecurie.org.uk
                connie.swenson@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
                johnMacArtney@warwick.ac.uk
                Rachel.perry@mariecurie.org.uk
                hazel.lamberton@mariecurie.org.uk
                lucy.hetherington1@nhs.net
                L.Graham-Wisener@qub.ac.uk
                scott.murray@ed.ac.uk
                emma.carduff@mariecurie.org.uk
                Journal
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliat Care
                BMC Palliative Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-684X
                15 January 2021
                15 January 2021
                2021
                : 20
                : 18
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh, 45 Frogston Road West, Edinburgh, EH10 7DR UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.4305.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, Primary Palliative Care Research Group, , Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, ; Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.7372.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8809 1613, Unit of Academic Primary Care, , University of Warwick, ; Gibbert Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
                [4 ]Marie Curie Hospice West Midlands, Marsh Lane, Solihull, B91 2PQ UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.470550.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0641 2540, Marie Curie Hospice Belfast, ; 1A Kensington Road, Belfast, BT5 6NF UK
                [6 ]Marie Curie Hospice Glasgow, 133 Balornock Rd, Glasgow, G21 3US UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.4777.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0374 7521, Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, , Queen’s University Belfast, ; Belfast, BT7 1NN UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3056-059X
                Article
                700
                10.1186/s12904-020-00700-3
                7809819
                33451311
                a9382d69-6e40-4036-8278-5aa7e5c7fbf5
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 October 2020
                : 17 December 2020
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article