9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Can Compression Garments Reduce the Deleterious Effects of Physical Exercise on Muscle Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The use of compression garments (CGs) during or after training and competition has gained popularity in the last few decades. However, the data concerning CGs’ beneficial effects on muscle strength-related outcomes after physical exercise remain inconclusive.

          Objective

          The aim was to determine whether wearing CGs during or after physical exercise would facilitate the recovery of muscle strength-related outcomes.

          Methods

          A systematic literature search was conducted across five databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCOhost). Data from 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 350 healthy participants were extracted and meta-analytically computed. Weighted between-study standardized mean differences (SMDs) with respect to their standard errors (SEs) were aggregated and corrected for sample size to compute overall SMDs. The type of physical exercise, the body area and timing of CG application, and the time interval between the end of the exercise and subsequent testing were assessed.

          Results

          CGs produced no strength-sparing effects (SMD [95% confidence interval]) at the following time points ( t) after physical exercise: immediately ≤  t < 24 h: − 0.02 (− 0.22 to 0.19), p = 0.87; 24 ≤  t < 48 h: − 0.00 (− 0.22 to 0.21), p = 0.98; 48 ≤  t < 72 h: − 0.03 (− 0.43 to 0.37), p = 0.87; 72 ≤  t < 96 h: 0.14 (− 0.21 to 0.49), p = 0.43; 96 h ≤  t: 0.26 (− 0.33 to 0.85), p = 0.38. The body area where the CG was applied had no strength-sparing effects. CGs revealed weak strength-sparing effects after plyometric exercise.

          Conclusion

          Meta-analytical evidence suggests that wearing a CG during or after training does not seem to facilitate the recovery of muscle strength following physical exercise. Practitioners, athletes, coaches, and trainers should reconsider the use of CG as a tool to reduce the effects of physical exercise on muscle strength.

          Trial Registration Number

          PROSPERO CRD42021246753.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-022-01681-4.

          Related collections

          Most cited references97

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

            Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Introduction to Meta‐Analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                negyesi@tohoku.ac.jp
                Journal
                Sports Med
                Sports Med
                Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.z.)
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0112-1642
                1179-2035
                27 April 2022
                27 April 2022
                2022
                : 52
                : 9
                : 2159-2175
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.69566.3a, ISNI 0000 0001 2248 6943, Division of Biomedical Engineering for Health and Welfare, , Tohoku University Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, ; Sendai, Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.4494.d, ISNI 0000 0000 9558 4598, Center for Human Movement Sciences, , University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, ; Groningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]GRID grid.9679.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0663 9479, Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, , University of Pécs, ; Pécs, Hungary
                [4 ]Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
                [5 ]GRID grid.11348.3f, ISNI 0000 0001 0942 1117, Division of Training and Movement Sciences, , University of Potsdam, ; Potsdam, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.417907.c, ISNI 0000 0004 5903 394X, Faculty of Sport, Health and Applied Science, , St Mary’s University, ; Twickenham, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.69566.3a, ISNI 0000 0001 2248 6943, Department of Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, , Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, ; Sendai, Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-3242
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5732-7942
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-813X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3038-7202
                Article
                1681
                10.1007/s40279-022-01681-4
                9388468
                35476183
                a7c8d7ef-163e-46f2-a2bb-37d54b70c0e9
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001691, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science;
                Award ID: 21K17600
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022

                Comments

                Comment on this article