12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Collaborative action for person-centred coordinated care (P3C): an approach to support the development of a comprehensive system-wide solution to fragmented care

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Fragmented care results in poor outcomes for individuals with complexity of need. Person-centred coordinated care (P3C) is perceived to be a potential solution, but an absence of accessible evidence and the lack of a scalable ‘blue print’ mean that services are ‘experimenting’ with new models of care with little guidance and support. This paper presents an approach to the implementation of P3C using collaborative action, providing examples of early developments across this programme of work, the core aim of which is to accelerate the spread and adoption of P3C in United Kingdom primary care settings.

          Methods

          Two centrally funded United Kingdom organisations (South West Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care and South West Academic Health Science Network) are leading this initiative to narrow the gap between research and practice in this urgent area of improvement through a programme of service change, evaluation and research. Multi-stakeholder engagement and co-design are core to the approach. A whole system measurement framework combines outcomes of importance to patients, practitioners and health organisations. Iterative and multi-level feedback helps to shape service change while collecting practice-based data to generate implementation knowledge for the delivery of P3C. The role of the research team is proving vital to support informed change and challenge organisational practice. The bidirectional flow of knowledge and evidence relies on the transitional positioning of researchers and research organisations.

          Results

          Extensive engagement and embedded researchers have led to strong collaborations across the region. Practice is beginning to show signs of change and data flow and exchange is taking place. However, working in this way is not without its challenges; progress has been slow in the development of a linked data set to allow us to assess impact innovations from a cost perspective. Trust is vital, takes time to establish and is dependent on the exchange of services and interactions. If collaborative action can foster P3C it will require sustained commitment from both research and practice. This approach is a radical departure from how policy, research and practice traditionally work, but one that we argue is now necessary to deal with the most complex health and social problems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence?

            L Green (2008)
            The usual search for explanations and solutions for the research-practice gap tends to analyze ways to communicate evidence-based practice guidelines to practitioners more efficiently and effectively from the end of a scientific pipeline. This examination of the pipeline looks upstream for ways in which the research itself is rendered increasingly irrelevant to the circumstances of practice by the process of vetting the research before it can qualify for inclusion in systematic reviews and the practice guidelines derived from them. It suggests a 'fallacy of the pipeline' implicit in one-way conceptualizations of translation, dissemination and delivery of research to practitioners. Secondly, it identifies a 'fallacy of the empty vessel' implicit in the assumptions underlying common characterizations of the practitioner as a recipient of evidence-based guidelines. Remedies are proposed that put emphasis on participatory approaches and more practice-based production of the research and more attention to external validity in the peer review, funding, publication and systematic reviews of research in producing evidence-based guidelines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Five Laws for Integrating Medical and Social Services: Lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                07772 475423 , helen.lloyd-1@plymouth.ac.uk
                mark.pearson@exeter.ac.uk
                rod.sheaff@plymouth.ac.uk
                s.asthana@plymouth.ac.uk
                hannahwheat81@gmail.com
                priya.sugavanam@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
                n.britten@exeter.ac.uk
                j.m.valderas@exeter.ac.uk
                michael.bainbridge@somersetccg.nhs.uk
                louise.witts@swahsn.com
                debra.westlake@plymouth.ac.uk
                jane.horrell@plymouth.ac.uk
                07772 475423 , richard.byng@plymouth.ac.uk
                Journal
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Research Policy and Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1478-4505
                22 November 2017
                22 November 2017
                2017
                : 15
                : 98
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Community and Primary Care Research Group, Clinical Trails and Population Studies, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N14, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8BX United Kingdom
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2219 0747, GRID grid.11201.33, School of Law, Criminology and Government, , University of Plymouth, ; Portland Villas, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA United Kingdom
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8024, GRID grid.8391.3, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), , Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, ; St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU United Kingdom
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8024, GRID grid.8391.3, Health Services & Policy Research, , University of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, APEx, University of Exeter Medical School, ; St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU United Kingdom
                [5 ]Primary Care Development Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group, Working Together to Improve Health and Wellbeing, Wynford House, Lufton Way, Yeovil, Somerset BA22 8HR United Kingdom
                [6 ]South West Academic Health Science Network, Pynes Hill Court, Pynes Hill, Exeter, EX2 5AZ United Kingdom
                Article
                263
                10.1186/s12961-017-0263-z
                5700670
                29166917
                a70ffd5e-b920-4e9b-9cea-89af2dde7a2f
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 March 2017
                : 26 October 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: SW Peninsula CLAHRC & SW AHSN
                Award ID: none
                Categories
                Opinion
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Health & Social care
                person-centred coordinated care,collaborative action,integration
                Health & Social care
                person-centred coordinated care, collaborative action, integration

                Comments

                Comment on this article