4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      RNA editing in nascent RNA affects pre-mRNA splicing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In eukaryotes, nascent RNA transcripts undergo an intricate series of RNA processing steps to achieve mRNA maturation. RNA editing and alternative splicing are two major RNA processing steps that can introduce significant modifications to the final gene products. By tackling these processes in isolation, recent studies have enabled substantial progress in understanding their global RNA targets and regulatory pathways. However, the interplay between individual steps of RNA processing, an essential aspect of gene regulation, remains poorly understood. By sequencing the RNA of different subcellular fractions, we examined the timing of adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing and its impact on alternative splicing. We observed that >95% A-to-I RNA editing events occurred in the chromatin-associated RNA prior to polyadenylation. We report about 500 editing sites in the 3′ acceptor sequences that can alter splicing of the associated exons. These exons are highly conserved during evolution and reside in genes with important cellular function. Furthermore, we identified a second class of exons whose splicing is likely modulated by RNA secondary structures that are recognized by the RNA editing machinery. The genome-wide analyses, supported by experimental validations, revealed remarkable interplay between RNA editing and splicing and expanded the repertoire of functional RNA editing sites.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Basic local alignment search tool.

          A new approach to rapid sequence comparison, basic local alignment search tool (BLAST), directly approximates alignments that optimize a measure of local similarity, the maximal segment pair (MSP) score. Recent mathematical results on the stochastic properties of MSP scores allow an analysis of the performance of this method as well as the statistical significance of alignments it generates. The basic algorithm is simple and robust; it can be implemented in a number of ways and applied in a variety of contexts including straightforward DNA and protein sequence database searches, motif searches, gene identification searches, and in the analysis of multiple regions of similarity in long DNA sequences. In addition to its flexibility and tractability to mathematical analysis, BLAST is an order of magnitude faster than existing sequence comparison tools of comparable sensitivity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Landscape of transcription in human cells

            Summary Eukaryotic cells make many types of primary and processed RNAs that are found either in specific sub-cellular compartments or throughout the cells. A complete catalogue of these RNAs is not yet available and their characteristic sub-cellular localizations are also poorly understood. Since RNA represents the direct output of the genetic information encoded by genomes and a significant proportion of a cell’s regulatory capabilities are focused on its synthesis, processing, transport, modifications and translation, the generation of such a catalogue is crucial for understanding genome function. Here we report evidence that three quarters of the human genome is capable of being transcribed, as well as observations about the range and levels of expression, localization, processing fates, regulatory regions and modifications of almost all currently annotated and thousands of previously unannotated RNAs. These observations taken together prompt to a redefinition of the concept of a gene.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project

              The GENCODE Consortium aims to identify all gene features in the human genome using a combination of computational analysis, manual annotation, and experimental validation. Since the first public release of this annotation data set, few new protein-coding loci have been added, yet the number of alternative splicing transcripts annotated has steadily increased. The GENCODE 7 release contains 20,687 protein-coding and 9640 long noncoding RNA loci and has 33,977 coding transcripts not represented in UCSC genes and RefSeq. It also has the most comprehensive annotation of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) loci publicly available with the predominant transcript form consisting of two exons. We have examined the completeness of the transcript annotation and found that 35% of transcriptional start sites are supported by CAGE clusters and 62% of protein-coding genes have annotated polyA sites. Over one-third of GENCODE protein-coding genes are supported by peptide hits derived from mass spectrometry spectra submitted to Peptide Atlas. New models derived from the Illumina Body Map 2.0 RNA-seq data identify 3689 new loci not currently in GENCODE, of which 3127 consist of two exon models indicating that they are possibly unannotated long noncoding loci. GENCODE 7 is publicly available from gencodegenes.org and via the Ensembl and UCSC Genome Browsers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genome Res
                Genome Res
                genome
                genome
                GENOME
                Genome Research
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
                1088-9051
                1549-5469
                June 2018
                June 2018
                : 28
                : 6
                : 812-823
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Bioengineering,
                [2 ]Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA;
                [3 ]Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA;
                [4 ]Molecular Biology Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: gxxiao@ 123456ucla.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9362-8029
                Article
                9509184
                10.1101/gr.231209.117
                5991522
                29724793
                a58de3a7-4a57-4dfb-84c7-f5b23e9bde94
                © 2018 Hsiao et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

                This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 October 2017
                : 26 April 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: U01HG009417
                Award ID: R01HG006264
                Award ID: R01AG056476
                Funded by: Eureka and Hyde fellowships of UCLA
                Categories
                Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article