0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The thioredoxin system determines CHK1 inhibitor sensitivity via redox-mediated regulation of ribonucleotide reductase activity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) is critical for cell survival under replication stress (RS). CHK1 inhibitors (CHK1i’s) in combination with chemotherapy have shown promising results in preclinical studies but have displayed minimal efficacy with substantial toxicity in clinical trials. To explore combinatorial strategies that can overcome these limitations, we perform an unbiased high-throughput screen in a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line and identify thioredoxin1 (Trx1), a major component of the mammalian antioxidant-system, as a determinant of CHK1i sensitivity. We establish a role for redox recycling of RRM1, the larger subunit of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), and a depletion of the deoxynucleotide pool in this Trx1-mediated CHK1i sensitivity. Further, the TrxR inhibitor auranofin, an approved anti-rheumatoid arthritis drug, shows a synergistic interaction with CHK1i via interruption of the deoxynucleotide pool. Together, we show a pharmacological combination to treat NSCLC that relies on a redox regulatory link between the Trx system and mammalian RNR activity.

          Abstract

          The clinical application of inhibitors targeting checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) is challenged by limited efficacy. Here, the authors identify that thioredoxin (Trx) system inhibition mediates sensitivity to CHK1 inhibitor via regulating the activity of ribonucleotide reductase, demonstrating the synergistic effect of CHK1 inhibitor and inhibitors targeting Trx system in lung cancer models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The thioredoxin antioxidant system.

          The thioredoxin (Trx) system, which is composed of NADPH, thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), and thioredoxin, is a key antioxidant system in defense against oxidative stress through its disulfide reductase activity regulating protein dithiol/disulfide balance. The Trx system provides the electrons to thiol-dependent peroxidases (peroxiredoxins) to remove reactive oxygen and nitrogen species with a fast reaction rate. Trx antioxidant functions are also shown by involvement in DNA and protein repair by reducing ribonucleotide reductase, methionine sulfoxide reductases, and regulating the activity of many redox-sensitive transcription factors. Moreover, Trx systems play critical roles in the immune response, virus infection, and cell death via interaction with thioredoxin-interacting protein. In mammalian cells, the cytosolic and mitochondrial Trx systems, in which TrxRs are high molecular weight selenoenzymes, together with the glutathione-glutaredoxin (Grx) system (NADPH, glutathione reductase, GSH, and Grx) control the cellular redox environment. Recently mammalian thioredoxin and glutathione systems have been found to be able to provide the electrons crossly and to serve as a backup system for each other. In contrast, bacteria TrxRs are low molecular weight enzymes with a structure and reaction mechanism distinct from mammalian TrxR. Many bacterial species possess specific thiol-dependent antioxidant systems, and the significance of the Trx system in the defense against oxidative stress is different. Particularly, the absence of a GSH-Grx system in some pathogenic bacteria such as Helicobacter pylori, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Staphylococcus aureus makes the bacterial Trx system essential for survival under oxidative stress. This provides an opportunity to kill these bacteria by targeting the TrxR-Trx system. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Replication stress and cancer.

            Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer, and DNA replication is the most vulnerable cellular process that can lead to it. Any condition leading to high levels of DNA damage will result in replication stress, which is a source of genome instability and a feature of pre-cancerous and cancerous cells. Therefore, understanding the molecular basis of replication stress is crucial to the understanding of tumorigenesis. Although a negative aspect of replication stress is its prominent role in tumorigenesis, a positive aspect is that it provides a potential target for cancer therapy. In this Review, we discuss the link between persistent replication stress and tumorigenesis, with the goal of shedding light on the mechanisms underlying the initiation of an oncogenic process, which should open up new possibilities for cancer diagnostics and treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer.

              Human cancers share properties referred to as hallmarks, among which sustained proliferation, escape from apoptosis, and genomic instability are the most pervasive. The sustained proliferation hallmark can be explained by mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressors that regulate cell growth, whereas the escape from apoptosis hallmark can be explained by mutations in the TP53, ATM, or MDM2 genes. A model to explain the presence of the three hallmarks listed above, as well as the patterns of genomic instability observed in human cancers, proposes that the genes driving cell proliferation induce DNA replication stress, which, in turn, generates genomic instability and selects for escape from apoptosis. Here, we review the data that support this model, as well as the mechanisms by which oncogenes induce replication stress. Further, we argue that DNA replication stress should be considered as a hallmark of cancer because it likely drives cancer development and is very prevalent.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Junran.zhang@osumc.edu
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                31 May 2024
                31 May 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 4667
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.261331.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2285 7943, Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, , The Ohio State University, ; Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.189967.8, ISNI 0000 0001 0941 6502, Center for ViroScience and Cure, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, , Emory University, ; Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.261331.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2285 7943, The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for Cancer Metabolism, , The Ohio State University, ; Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [4 ]The Ohio State University, ( https://ror.org/00rs6vg23) Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, College of Medicine, ( https://ror.org/00c01js51) Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical Informatics, Wexner Medical Center, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, ( https://ror.org/00rs6vg23) Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                [7 ]Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, ( https://ror.org/012mef835) Augusta, GA 30912 USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.261331.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2285 7943, The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, , The Ohio State University, ; Columbus, OH 43210 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-2666
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1325-1696
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8397-3507
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-2148
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-390X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-4335
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5413-3675
                Article
                48076
                10.1038/s41467-024-48076-9
                11143221
                38821952
                a26020a6-3ffb-419d-8ec8-8abcaab2500a
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 13 April 2023
                : 19 April 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: The work described herein was supported by grants (R01 CA249198), and the Lung Cancer Discovery Award, and DOD LCRP, W81XWH2010868 and Pelotonia Idea Award to J. Zhang from the National Cancer Institute and American Lung Association and U.S. Department of Defense and the Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Intramural Research Program respectively; This research was also supported by the seed grand of Department Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University to C. Prasad; The project was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (grant no. UL1TR002733). dNTP data was generated using the funds from the grants NIH R01 AI136581 and NIH R01 AI150451 to B. Kim.
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                lung cancer,cancer therapeutic resistance,non-small-cell lung cancer
                Uncategorized
                lung cancer, cancer therapeutic resistance, non-small-cell lung cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article