0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Novel lateral flow assay for point-of-care detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in syndromic management settings: a cross-sectional performance evaluation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          A rapid and affordable point-of-care test is a priority for Neisseria gonorrhoeae control. WHO and Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) have a target product profile for a non-molecular N gonorrhoeae rapid point-of-care test that requires a clinical sensitivity of greater than 80% and a specificity over 95% to be considered useful in syndromic management; test turnaround time should be 30 min or under, and the test should cost less than US$3. A novel lateral flow assay (LFA) was developed to achieve that profile.

          Methods

          In this cross-sectional study we evaluated the performance of the novel N gonorrhoeae lateral flow assay (NG-LFA) at the primary health-care level in South Africa. Male patients with urethral discharge syndrome and female patients with vaginal discharge syndrome were recruited from five primary health-care facilities in the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality health district of South Africa. First-void urine specimens and nurse-collected vaginal swabs were tested in-facility with the NG-LFA and Xpert CT/NG PCR assay. N gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) was performed on all LFA positive specimens.

          Findings

          Between March 7, and Sept 19, 2022, we enrolled 200 male patients with urethral discharge and 200 female patients with vaginal discharge. The median age of male patients was 24 years (IQR 21–31 years), and the median age of female patients was 25 years (IQR 21–32 years). In addition, 23 male patients and 12 female patients who presented at the facility with a partner notification slip were enrolled of whom one (4%) and five (42%) were symptomatic, respectively. NG-LFA and Xpert results were available for all participants. In urine specimens, NG-LFA sensitivity was 96·1% (Wilson 95% CI 91·2–98·3; 123 LFA-positive among 128 PCR-positive specimens) and 91·7% in vaginal swab specimens (78·2–97·1; 33 LFA-positive among 36 PCR-positive). The specificity was 97·2% in urine specimens (90·4–99·2; 70 LFA-negative among 72 PCR-negative) and 96·3% in vaginal specimens (92·2–98·3; 158 LFA-negative among 164 PCR-negative). In 156 LFA-positive specimens, NG-MAST showed 93 different sequence types.

          Interpretation

          The novel NG-LFA had excellent clinical sensitivity and specificity in symptomatic male and female patients. The test met the optimal requirement for sensitivity and the minimal requirement for specificity specified in the target product profile. NG-LFA could provide an important tool to optimise clinical management and reduce excess antibiotic use in settings without direct access to laboratory testing.

          Funding

          Global Antimicrobial Resistance Innovation Fund (GAMRIF) via FIND and National Institutes of Health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016

          Abstract Objective To generate estimates of the global prevalence and incidence of urogenital infection with chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis in women and men, aged 15–49 years, in 2016. Methods For chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomoniasis, we systematically searched for studies conducted between 2009 and 2016 reporting prevalence. We also consulted regional experts. To generate estimates, we used Bayesian meta-analysis. For syphilis, we aggregated the national estimates generated by using Spectrum-STI. Findings For chlamydia, gonorrhoea and/or trichomoniasis, 130 studies were eligible. For syphilis, the Spectrum-STI database contained 978 data points for the same period. The 2016 global prevalence estimates in women were: chlamydia 3.8% (95% uncertainty interval, UI: 3.3–4.5); gonorrhoea 0.9% (95% UI: 0.7–1.1); trichomoniasis 5.3% (95% UI:4.0–7.2); and syphilis 0.5% (95% UI: 0.4–0.6). In men prevalence estimates were: chlamydia 2.7% (95% UI: 1.9–3.7); gonorrhoea 0.7% (95% UI: 0.5–1.1); trichomoniasis 0.6% (95% UI: 0.4–0.9); and syphilis 0.5% (95% UI: 0.4–0.6). Total estimated incident cases were 376.4 million: 127.2 million (95% UI: 95.1–165.9 million) chlamydia cases; 86.9 million (95% UI: 58.6–123.4 million) gonorrhoea cases; 156.0 million (95% UI: 103.4–231.2 million) trichomoniasis cases; and 6.3 million (95% UI: 5.5–7.1 million) syphilis cases. Conclusion Global estimates of prevalence and incidence of these four curable sexually transmitted infections remain high. The study highlights the need to expand data collection efforts at country level and provides an initial baseline for monitoring progress of the World Health Organization global health sector strategy on sexually transmitted infections 2016–2021.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sexually transmitted infections: challenges ahead.

            WHO estimated that nearly 1 million people become infected every day with any of four curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs): chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis. Despite their high global incidence, STIs remain a neglected area of research. In this Commission, we have prioritised five areas that represent particular challenges in STI treatment and control. Chlamydia remains the most commonly diagnosed bacterial STI in high-income countries despite widespread testing recommendations, sensitive and specific non-invasive testing techniques, and cheap effective therapy. We discuss the challenges for chlamydia control and evidence to support a shift from the current focus on infection-based screening to improved management of diagnosed cases and of chlamydial morbidity, such as pelvic inflammatory disease. The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is globally recognised. We review current and potential future control and treatment strategies, with a focus on novel antimicrobials. Bacterial vaginosis is the most common vaginal disorder in women, but current treatments are associated with frequent recurrence. Recurrence after treatment might relate to evidence that suggests sexual transmission is integral to the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis, which has substantial implications for the development of effective management approaches. STIs disproportionately affect low-income and middle-income countries. We review strategies for case management, focusing on point-of-care tests that hold considerable potential for improving STI control. Lastly, STIs in men who have sex with men have increased since the late 1990s. We discuss the contribution of new biomedical HIV prevention strategies and risk compensation. Overall, this Commission aims to enhance the understanding of some of the key challenges facing the field of STIs, and outlines new approaches to improve the clinical management of STIs and public health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              REASSURED diagnostics to inform disease control strategies, strengthen health systems and improve patient outcomes

              Lack of access to quality diagnostics remains a major contributor to health burden in resource-limited settings. It has been more than 10 years since ASSURED (affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, rapid, equipment-free, delivered) was coined to describe the ideal test to meet the needs of the developing world. Since its initial publication, technological innovations have led to the development of diagnostics that address the ASSURED criteria, but challenges remain. From this perspective, we assess factors contributing to the success and failure of ASSURED diagnostics, lessons learnt in the implementation of ASSURED tests over the past decade, and highlight additional conditions that should be considered in addressing point-of-care needs. With rapid advances in digital technology and mobile health (m-health), future diagnostics should incorporate these elements to give us REASSURED diagnostic systems that can inform disease control strategies in real-time, strengthen the efficiency of health care systems and improve patient outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                2985213R
                5470
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                9 July 2024
                17 February 2024
                06 February 2024
                14 July 2024
                : 403
                : 10427
                : 657-664
                Affiliations
                Foundation for Professional Development, Research Unit, East London, South Africa (Prof R P H Peters PhD, M M Mdingi MSc, R M S Gigi MMed, L de Vos MSc); Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa (Prof R P H Peters, H Jung PhD); Division of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (Prof R P H Peters); Keck School of Medicine, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA (Prof J D Klausner MD); Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland (L Mazzola PhD, J Piton PhD, B Gleeson PhD, C Ferreyra MD); Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (R M S Gigi); Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA (J Daniels PhD); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA (P C Adamson MD)
                Author notes

                Contributors

                RPHP, JDK, LM, JP, JD, PCA, BG, and CF contributed to the study design. RPHP, JDK, LM, BG, and CF led overall study implementation, and MMM, RMSG, and LdV were responsible for daily operations at the clinical research sites. RPHP and MMM had full access to the study data. RPHP and HJ were responsible for laboratory microbiological analysis of discordant specimens. RPHP, JDK, LM, MMM, HJ, RMSG, PCA, BG, and CF were involved in data analysis and interpretation. RPHP wrote the first manuscript draft, with contributions from JDK, LM, BG, and CF. All coauthors critically revised the versions of the manuscript and approved the final submitted version.

                Correspondence to: Prof R P H Peters, Foundation for Professional Development, Research Unit, 16 Surrey Road, East London, South Africa remcop@ 123456foundation.co.za
                Article
                NIHMS2002671
                10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02240-7
                11246789
                38335982
                a054b14a-cbf5-49c8-a0bf-9cfffe2d55c3

                This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article