4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How many pigs? Statistical power considerations in swine nutrition experiments.

      1 ,
      Journal of animal science
      American Society of Animal Science (ASAS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Replication refers to the assignment of more than one experimental unit to the same treatment. Each replication of a treatment is an independent observation; thus, each replication involves a different experimental unit. In swine nutrition research, the experimental unit may be an individual animal, as in sow reproduction experiments, or a group of animals, as in growing-finishing pig experiments. In either case, calculation of the number of replicates needed to give an accurate and reliable outcome is an important step in deriving an experimental protocol. Although investigators often seem to choose replication arbitrarily on the basis of cost or availability of animals, housing considerations, convenience, or tradition, the question of how many pigs (i.e., how much replication is necessary) is a statistical one that has a statistical answer. A power analysis, performed while designing an experiment, will provide an investigator with an estimate of the number of replicates needed for an experiment of known power and sensitivity. This a priori, or prospective, power analysis ensures that an investigator does not waste time and resources carrying out an experiment that has little chance of finding a significant effect, if one exists. It also makes sure resources are not wasted by including more experimental units than are necessary to detect an effect. A retrospective, or a posteriori, power analysis may also be conducted. If no significant effects are found in an experiment, an investigator can assess the observed power of the experiment, or may determine the size of treatment effect that could have been detected using the standard deviation and number of replicates in the experiment. The latter may be useful in explaining results. However, the former may be misleading because a high P-value will invariably result in a low observed power, and little new information will be gained from the post hoc power analysis. In most cases, the time for making power calculations is before, not after, an experiment is conducted.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Anim Sci
          Journal of animal science
          American Society of Animal Science (ASAS)
          1525-3163
          0021-8812
          2004
          : 82 E-Suppl
          Affiliations
          [1 ] University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215, USA. daaron@uky.edu <daaron@uky.edu>
          Article
          82/13_suppl/E245
          10.2527/2004.8213_supplE245x
          15471805
          9d971668-dbec-43ab-bfc1-9b06c38c3c3c
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content10

          Cited by13