0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New Applications of the Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postoperative Radiotherapy

      research-article
      , MD, , MD , , MD, PhD, , MD
      Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Several studies have reported preliminary experiences with the anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) flap for treating partial breast defects or breast implant exposure following reconstruction. As radiotherapy is commonly administered for breast cancer, some patients may present with heavily damaged skin flaps and chronic radiodermatitis. We describe new applications of a de-epithelialized AICAP flap, used in combination with an implant, for breast reconstruction when other treatment options are unavailable.

          Methods:

          A retrospective study was conducted, including all patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction with the aid of an AICAP flap. A literature review was also performed.

          Results:

          Between November 2022 and August 2023, four pedicled AICAP flaps were harvested in four patients. The indications were breast implant coverage in cases of chronic dermatitis of the mastectomy skin flaps (two unilateral flaps) and inferolateral coverage of partially submuscular expanders for immediate breast reconstruction (two unilateral flaps). All four flaps were based on one perforator. The mean harvesting time was 40 minutes. Complete flap survival was achieved, with no complications at the donor site.

          Conclusions:

          The AICAP flap is a safe and reliable technique for difficult cases of breast reconstruction when no other options are available. Moreover, this technique can easily provide additional coverage for the breast implant when needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps.

          Anatomy and classification of intercostal perforator flaps in addition to our experience with will be demonstrated for different indications. The intercostal vessels form an arcade between the aorta and the internal mammary vessels. Different pedicled perforator flaps can be raised on this neurovascular bundle to cover defects on the trunk. They are classified as following: dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap (DICAP); lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP); and anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) flap. Between 2001 and 2004, 20 pedicled (ICAP) flaps were harvested in 16 patients. The indications were: immediate partial breast reconstruction in eight patients who had a quadrantectomy for breast cancer; midline back and sternal defects in three patients who had radical excisions for a dermatofibrosarcoma or malignant melanoma; and autologous breast augmentation (four bilateral and one unilateral flap) in five post-bariatric-surgery patients. The average flap dimension was 18 x 8 cm(2) (range 8 x 5-24 x 12 cm(2)). There were two DICAP flaps, two (AICAP) flaps and 16 (LICAP) flaps. All but two flaps were based on one perforator. Mean harvesting time was 45min for a single flap. Bilateral breast augmentation with LICAP flap necessitated longer operative time (range 2-3h) depending whether it was combined or not with mastopoexy. Complete flaps survival was obtained. All donor sites were closed primarily. The (ICAP) flaps provide valuable options in breast surgery; and for challenging defects on the trunk without sacrifice of the underlying muscle.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The "Gent" consensus on perforator flap terminology: preliminary definitions.

            Due to its increasing popularity, more and more articles on the use of perforator flaps have been reported in the literature during the past few years. Because the area of perforator flaps is new and rapidly evolving, there are no definitions and standard rules on terminology and nomenclature, which creates confusion when surgeons try to communicate and compare surgical techniques. This article attempts to represent the opinion of a group of pioneers in the field of perforator flap surgery. This consensus was reached after a terminology consensus meeting held during the Fifth International Course on Perforator Flaps in Gent, Belgium, on September 29, 2001. It stipulates not only the definitions of perforator vessels and perforator flaps but also the correct nomenclature for different perforator flaps. The authors believe that this consensus is a foundation that will stimulate further discussion and encourage further refinements in the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept.

              Pedicled perforator flaps have not been widely described for the breast. The aim of this study is to report our clinical experience with pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. Between May 2000 and May 2003, pedicled perforator flaps were used in 31 patients. The indications were immediate partial breast reconstruction and thoracic reconstruction for carcinomatous mastitis or tumour recurrence. Perforators were identified by Doppler preoperatively. The Doppler-located thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) or another perforator such as the intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) was looked for. If the perforators had good calibers, the flaps were then based solely on these perforators. If the perforators were tiny but pulsating, the TDAP flap was harvested as a muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi type I (MS-LD I) with a small piece of muscle (4x2 cm) included to protect the perforators. If the perforators were not-pulsating, a larger segment of the LD muscle was incorporated to include the maximum of perforators (MS-LD II flap). The nerve that innervates the rest of the LD muscle was always spared. If most of the LD was included in the flap, the flap was then classified as MS-LD III. The mean flap dimensions were 20x8 cm. Using this algorithm, the TDAP flap was harvested in 18 cases and the ICAP flap in three cases. In addition, there were 10 MS-LD flaps with a variable amount of muscle. In addition, one parascapular flap was dissected. A successful flap transfer was achieved in all but three patients, in whom limited partial necrosis occurred. Seroma was not encountered at the donor sites of the perforator flaps (0%) compared to four (40%) after a MS-LD flap. Our results show that pedicled perforator flaps are additional options for breast surgery and that they may be used whenever an adequate perforator can be found. This technique is safe and reliable if the algorithm described is used when choosing a flap.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2169-7574
                July 2024
                09 July 2024
                : 12
                : 7
                : e5957
                Affiliations
                [1]From the Department of Surgery, Plastic Surgery Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
                Author notes
                Luca Patanè, MD, Department of Surgery, Plastic Surgery Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, E-mail: luca.patane@ 123456uniroma1.it
                Article
                GOX-D-24-00079 00026
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000005957
                11233107
                38983947
                9bb2b6b9-bb1c-4bf4-ba68-1627e7e133a9
                Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 24 January 2024
                : 30 April 2024
                Categories
                Breast
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                ITALY

                Comments

                Comment on this article