7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applications are also prevalent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the utilization of tissue expansion in such less well-characterized circumstances.

          Methods:

          The authors conducted a systematic review of all publications describing non-breast applications of tissue expansion. Variables regarding expander specifications, expansion process, and complications were collected and further analyzed.

          Results:

          A total of 565 publications were identified. Of these, 166 publications described tissue expansion for “less traditional” indications, which fell into 5 categories: ear reconstruction, cranioplasty, abdominal wall reconstruction, orthopedic procedures, and genital (penile/scrotal and vaginal/vulva) reconstruction. While lower extremity expansion is known to have high complication rates, tissue expander failure, infection, and exposure rates were in fact highest for penile/scrotal (failure: 18.5%; infection: 15.5%; exposure: 12.5%) and vaginal/vulva (failure: 20.6%; infection: 10.3%; exposure: 6.9%) reconstruction.

          Conclusions:

          Tissue expansion enables index operations by providing additional skin before definitive reconstruction. Tissue expanders are a valuable option along the reconstructive ladder because they obviate the need for free tissue transfer. Although tissue expansion comes with inherent risk, aggregate outcome failures of the final reconstruction are similar to published rates of complications without pre-expansion. Thus, although tissue expansion requires a staged approach, it remains a valuable option in facilitating a variety of reconstructive procedures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references181

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Penile reconstruction: is the radial forearm flap really the standard technique?

          The ideal goals in penile reconstruction are well described, but the multitude of flaps used for phalloplasty only demonstrates that none of these techniques is considered ideal. Still, the radial forearm flap is the most frequently used flap and universally considered as the standard technique. In this article, the authors describe the largest series to date of 287 radial forearm phalloplasties performed by the same surgical team. Many different outcome parameters have been described separately in previously published articles, but the main purpose of this review is to critically evaluate to what degree this supposed standard technique has been able to meet the ideal goals in penile reconstruction. Outcome parameters such as number of procedures, complications, aesthetic outcome, tactile and erogenous sensation, voiding, donor-site morbidity, scrotoplasty, and sexual intercourse are assessed. In the absence of prospective randomized studies, it is not possible to prove whether the radial forearm flap truly is the standard technique in penile reconstruction. However, this large study demonstrates that the radial forearm phalloplasty is a very reliable technique for the creation, mostly in two stages, of a normal-appearing penis and scrotum, always allowing the patient to void while standing and in most cases also to experience sexual satisfaction. The relative disadvantages of this technique are the rather high number of initial fistulas, the residual scar on the forearm, and the potential long-term urologic complications. Despite the lack of actual data to support this statement, the authors feel strongly that a multidisciplinary approach with close cooperation between the reconstructive/plastic surgeon and the urologist is an absolute requisite for obtaining the best possible results.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The expansion of an area of skin by progressive distention of a subcutaneous balloon; use of the method for securing skin for subtotal reconstruction of the ear.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phalloplasty in female-to-male transsexuals using free radial osteocutaneous flap: a series of 22 cases.

              From July 1994 to December 1996, 22 cases of primary female transsexualism received phalloplasty using free radial forearm osteocutaneous flaps in The Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 35 months. No complete flap loss and one partial loss (10% reduction) were noted after operation. The urethrocutaneous fistula rate was 40.9%, needing fistula repair surgery. Urethral stricture was noted in three cases (13.7%). Significant donor forearm morbidity was noted in two cases (9.1%) including one who suffered from radius bone fracture. All preserved 'clitorises' had intact erotic sensation and all neophalli gained protective sensation within 9 months. No 'penile fracture' was noted. In nine cases that have regular sexual activities, the sexual performance was rated as satisfactory. We share our experience and recommend that the free radial forearm osteocutaneous tubing flap is a promising choice for phalloplasty in female-to-male transsexuals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2169-7574
                21 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 9
                : 1
                : e3378
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
                []Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, N.C.
                Author notes
                Detlev Erdmann, MD, PhD, MHSc, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, DUMC, Box 3181, Durham, NC 27710, E-mail: detlev.erdmann@ 123456duke.edu
                Article
                00038
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000003378
                7862073
                33564595
                9a1474fb-d768-45fb-9e59-3f0a72859188
                Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 23 September 2020
                : 23 November 2020
                Categories
                Original Article
                Reconstructive
                Custom metadata
                T
                TRUE
                UNITED STATES

                Comments

                Comment on this article