11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. I. mate preferences of wild-caught females

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ultraviolet (UV) A signals (320–400 nm) are important in mate choice in numerous species. The sensitivity for UV signals is not only assumed to be costly, but also expected to be a function of the prevailing ecological conditions. Generally, those signals are favored by selection that efficiently reach the receiver. A decisive factor for color signaling is the lighting environment, especially in aquatic habitats, as the visibility of signals, and thus costs and benefits, are instantaneously influenced by it. Although ecological aspects of color signal evolution are relatively well-studied, there is little data on specific effects of environmental UV-light conditions on signaling at these shorter wavelengths. We studied wild-caught gravid female 3-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus of 2 photic habitat types (tea-stained and clear-water lakes), possessing great variation in their UV transmission. In 2 treatments, tea-stained and clear-water, preferences for males viewed under UV-present (UV+) and UV-absent (UV–) conditions were tested. A preference for males under UV+ conditions was found for females from both habitat types, thus stressing the significance of UV signals in stickleback’s mate choice decisions. However, females from both habitat types showed the most pronounced preferences for males under UV+ conditions under clear-water test conditions. Moreover, reflectance measurements revealed that the carotenoid-based orange-red breeding coloration in wild-caught males of both habitat types differed significantly in color intensity (higher in clear-water males) and hue (more red shifted in clear-water males) while no significant differences in UV coloration were found. The differential reflection patterns in longer wavelengths suggest that sticklebacks of both habitat types have adapted to the respective water conditions. Adaptations of UV signals in a sexual context to ambient light conditions in both behavior and coloration seem less evident.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

            J. Endler (1998)
            During courtship, signals are sent between the sexes, and received signals contain information that forms the basis of decision making. Much is known about signal content, but less is known about signal design-what makes signals work efficiently? A consideration of design not only gives new insights into the evolution of signals (including novelty), but also allows the development of specific and testable predictions about the direction of evolution. Recently there has been increased interest in signal design, but this has resulted in some apparently divergent views in the literature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks.

              J Boughman (2001)
              Sexual selection may facilitate speciation because it can cause rapid evolutionary diversification of male mating signals and female preferences. Divergence in these traits can then contribute to reproductive isolation. The sensory drive hypothesis predicts that three mechanisms underlie divergence in sexually selected traits: (1) habitat-specific transmission of male signals; (2) adaptation of female perceptual sensitivity to local ecological conditions; and (3) matching of male signals to female perceptual sensitivity. I test these mechanisms in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus spp.) that live in different light environments. Here I show that female perceptual sensitivity to red light varies with the extent of redshift in the light environment, and contributes to divergent preferences. Male nuptial colour varies with environment and is tuned to female perceptual sensitivity. The extent of divergence among populations in both male signal colour and female preference for red is correlated with the extent of reproductive isolation in these recently diverged species. These results demonstrate that divergent sexual selection generated by sensory drive contributes to speciation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Handling Editor
                Journal
                Curr Zool
                Curr Zool
                czoolo
                Current Zoology
                Oxford University Press
                1674-5507
                2396-9814
                June 2021
                13 March 2021
                13 March 2021
                : 67
                : 3
                : 299-308
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn , An der Immenburg 1, Bonn, 53121, Germany
                [2 ] Institute of Zoology, Functional Ecology, University of Hamburg , Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, Hamburg, 20146, Germany
                [3 ] Institute of Zoology, University of Bonn , Meckenheimer Allee 169, Bonn, 53115, Germany
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Theo C. M. Bakker. E-mail: tbakker@ 123456evolution.uni-bonn.de
                Article
                zoab008
                10.1093/cz/zoab008
                8488994
                34616922
                99220077-26d1-40e9-9d2f-9deb2e2d0cac
                © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 10 November 2020
                : 18 January 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DOI 10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: BA 2885/1-5
                Categories
                Special Column: Sexual Selection and Environmental Change
                Guest Editors: Natalie Pilakouta, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK Murielle Ålund, Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, USA
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01320
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01130

                color signals,female mate preference,gasterosteus aculeatus,lighting environment,sensory drive,uv vision

                Comments

                Comment on this article