3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experiences of Inpatient Healthcare Services Among Children With Medical Complexity and Their Families: A Scoping Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Children with medical complexity (CMC) have high healthcare utilization and face unique challenges during hospital admissions. The evidence describing their experiences of inpatient care is distributed across disciplines. The aim of this scoping review was to map the evidence related to the inpatient experience of care for CMC and their families, particularly related to key aspects and methodological approaches, and identify gaps that warrant further study.

          Methods

          This scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology and included all studies that reported experiences of acute hospital care for CMC/families. All study designs were included. Databases searched included EMBASE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science, MEDLINE(R) and APA PsycInfo from 2000 to 2022. Details about the participants, concepts, study methods and key findings were abstracted using a data abstraction tool. A thematic analysis was conducted.

          Results

          Forty‐nine papers were included: 27 qualitative studies, 10 quantitative studies, six mixed methods studies, two descriptive studies and four reviews. Some quantitative studies used validated instruments to measure experience of care, but many used non‐validated surveys. There were a few interventional studies with a small sample size. Results of thematic analysis described the importance of negotiating care roles, shared decision‐making, common goal setting, relationship‐building, communication, sharing expertise and the hospital setting itself.

          Conclusion

          CMC and families value relational elements of care and partnering through sharing expertise, decision‐making and collaborative goal‐setting when admitted to hospital.

          Patient or Public Contribution

          This review was conducted in alignment with the principles of patient and family engagement. The review was conceptualized, co‐designed and conducted with the full engagement of the project's parent–partner. This team member was involved in all stages from constructing the review question, to developing the protocol, screening articles and drafting this manuscript.

          Practitioner Points

          Qualitative research describes key elements of inpatient experience of care for CMC and their families as relationships, communication, respect for parent/provider expertise and the hospital setting. There is less evidence on measuring experience of care using quantitative methodology, particularly using validating instruments. This would be helpful to support the evaluation of inpatient interventions to improve the experiences of CMC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

            Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

              Background Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process. Discussion We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Summary Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tammie.dewan@ahs.ca
                Journal
                Health Expect
                Health Expect
                10.1111/(ISSN)1369-7625
                HEX
                Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1369-6513
                1369-7625
                04 September 2024
                October 2024
                : 27
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/hex.v27.5 )
                : e14178
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Pediatrics University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
                [ 2 ] College of Nursing Trinity Western University Langley British Columbia Canada
                [ 3 ] Patient, Family and Community Engagement, The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 4 ] Library and Cultural Resources University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Tammie Dewan ( tammie.dewan@ 123456ahs.ca )

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2089-7738
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-0667
                http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3128-0028
                Article
                HEX14178
                10.1111/hex.14178
                11372467
                39229799
                9874b776-659c-4187-8e5d-36234d12691b
                © 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 July 2024
                : 20 September 2023
                : 25 July 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 33, Words: 14294
                Funding
                Funded by: This study was financially supported by O'Brien Center Summer Studentship Program, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary.
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.8 mode:remove_FC converted:04.09.2024

                Health & Social care
                children with medical complexity,communication,experience of care,inpatient,relationships

                Comments

                Comment on this article