3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Alternative Methods for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Dose Adjustment of Tuberculosis Treatment in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objective

          Quantifying exposure to drugs for personalized dose adjustment is of critical importance in patients with tuberculosis who may be at risk of treatment failure or toxicity due to individual variability in pharmacokinetics. Traditionally, serum or plasma samples have been used for drug monitoring, which only poses collection and logistical challenges in high-tuberculosis burden/low-resourced areas. Less invasive and lower cost tests using alternative biomatrices other than serum or plasma may improve the feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring.

          Methods

          A systematic review was conducted to include studies reporting anti-tuberculosis drug concentration measurements in dried blood spots, urine, saliva, and hair. Reports were screened to include study design, population, analytical methods, relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, and risk of bias.

          Results

          A total of 75 reports encompassing all four biomatrices were included. Dried blood spots reduced the sample volume requirement and cut shipping costs whereas simpler laboratory methods to test the presence of drug in urine can allow point-of-care testing in high-burden settings. Minimal pre-processing requirements with saliva samples may further increase acceptability for laboratory staff. Multi-analyte panels have been tested in hair with the capacity to test a wide range of drugs and some of their metabolites.

          Conclusions

          Reported data were mostly from small-scale studies and alternative biomatrices need to be qualified in large and diverse populations for the demonstration of feasibility in operational settings. High-quality interventional studies will improve the uptake of alternative biomatrices in guidelines and accelerate implementation in programmatic tuberculosis treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

          Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis not due to noncompliance but to between-patient pharmacokinetic variability.

            It is believed that nonadherence is the proximate cause of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-tuberculosis) emergence. The level of nonadherence associated with emergence of MDR-tuberculosis is unknown. Performance of a randomized controlled trial in which some patients are randomized to nonadherence would be unethical; therefore, other study designs should be utilized. We performed hollow fiber studies for both bactericidal and sterilizing effect, with inoculum spiked with 0.5% rifampin- and isoniazid-resistant isogenic strains in some experiments. Standard therapy was administered daily for 28-56 days, with extents of nonadherence varying between 0% and 100%. Sizes of drug-resistant populations were compared using analysis of variance. We also explored the effect of pharmacokinetic variability on MDR-tuberculosis emergence using computer-aided clinical trial simulations of 10 000 Cape Town, South Africa, tuberculosis patients. Therapy failure was only encountered at extents of nonadherence ≥60%. Surprisingly, isoniazid- and rifampin-resistant populations did not achieve ≥1% proportion in any experiment and did not achieve a higher proportion with nonadherence. However, clinical trial simulations demonstrated that approximately 1% of tuberculosis patients with perfect adherence would still develop MDR-tuberculosis due to pharmacokinetic variability alone. These data, based on a preclinical model, demonstrate that nonadherence alone is not a sufficient condition for MDR-tuberculosis emergence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of clinical studies supports the pharmacokinetic variability hypothesis for acquired drug resistance and failure of antituberculosis therapy.

              Using hollow-fiber tuberculosis studies, we recently demonstrated that nonadherence is not a significant factor for ADR and that therapy failure only occurs after a large proportion of doses are missed. Computer-aided clinical trial simulations have suggested that isoniazid and rifampin pharmacokinetic variability best explained poor outcomes. We were interested in determining whether isoniazid pharmacokinetic variability was associated with either microbiological failure or ADR in the clinic. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials that reported isoniazid acetylation status and microbiological outcomes were selected. The main effects examined were microbiological sputum conversion, ADR, and relapse. Effect size was expressed as pooled risk ratios (RRs) comparing rapid with slow acetylators. Thirteen randomized studies with 1631 rapid acetylators and 1751 slow acetylators met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Rapid acetylators were more likely than slow acetylators to have microbiological failure (RR, 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.7), ADR (RR, 2.0; CI, 1.1-3.4), and relapse (RR, 1.3; CI, .9-2.0). Higher failure rates were encountered even in drug regimens comprising >3 antibiotics. No publication bias or small-study effects were observed for the outcomes evaluated. Pharmacokinetic variability to a single drug in the regimen is significantly associated with failure of therapy and ADR in patients. This suggests that individualized dosing for tuberculosis may be more effective than standardized dosing, which is prescribed in directly observed therapy programs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                johannes.alffenaar@sydney.edu.au
                Journal
                Clin Pharmacokinet
                Clin Pharmacokinet
                Clinical Pharmacokinetics
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0312-5963
                1179-1926
                4 March 2023
                4 March 2023
                2023
                : 62
                : 3
                : 375-398
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.27755.32, ISNI 0000 0000 9136 933X, Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, , University of Virginia, ; Charlottesville, VA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.430387.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8796, Global TB Institute and Department of Medicine, , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, ; Newark, NJ USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.444951.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1792 3071, National Drug Information and Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centre, , Hanoi University of Pharmacy, ; Hanoi, Vietnam
                [4 ]GRID grid.266102.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, , University of California, San Francisco, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.266102.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, , University of California, San Francisco, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.266102.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, , University of California, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Pharmacy School, , The University of Sydney, ; Pharmacy Building (A15), Science Road, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
                [8 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, The University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [9 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, , The University of Sydney, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-0288
                Article
                1220
                10.1007/s40262-023-01220-y
                10042915
                36869170
                96df082d-1015-437a-89ac-07af14f6c659
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 6 February 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01 AI137080
                Award ID: RO1 AI137080
                Award ID: R01 AI137080
                Award ID: R01 AI137080
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: University of Sydney
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023

                Comments

                Comment on this article