0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Organisational Anomie: A Qualitative Study on Homecare Workers' Experiences of Work and Organisational Normative Structure

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The organisational environment and work design dramatically influence employees' performance, wellbeing and identity. However, little is known about how organisational normative structure – that is, the set of general values and shared norms that regulate individuals' behaviours in a community or an organisation – influences employees experiences and wellbeing. We apply the concept of anomie to explore how Norwegian homecare workers (HCWs) experience their working environment, the normative structure of their organisation and its influence on their performance, wellbeing and identity. We examine organisational anomie in terms of perceptions of a discrepancy between job demands, various expectations and job resources as well as a discrepancy between one's normative ideals of care and the organisational work design to fulfil the caring duties and obligations. We conducted a qualitative interview study, recruiting 10 HCWs in Norway. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed the following five major themes to describe HCWs' understanding of their working environment and its influence: (1) The only sure thing is that anything can happen, (2) Multiple affordances of home as a context for care, (3) Conflict between normative beliefs and the organisational working environment, (4) Time pressure affects presence and (5) Did I do a good enough job? We discuss these themes with regard to their practical implications for the homecare institution and the theoretical implications for extending anomie theories to the organisational context.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.

            The job demands-resources (JD-R) model was introduced in the international literature 15 years ago (Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, & Schaufeli, 2001). The model has been applied in thousands of organizations and has inspired hundreds of empirical articles, including 1 of the most downloaded articles of the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (Bakker, Demerouti, & Euwema, 2005). This article provides evidence for the buffering role of various job resources on the impact of various job demands on burnout. In the present article, we look back on the first 10 years of the JD-R model (2001-2010), and discuss how the model matured into JD-R theory (2011-2016). Moreover, we look at the future of the theory and outline which new issues in JD-R theory are worthwhile of investigation. We also discuss practical applications. It is our hope that JD-R theory will continue to inspire researchers and practitioners who want to promote employee well-being and effective organizational functioning. (PsycINFO Database Record
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Social Structure and Anomie

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
                Community & Applied Soc Psy
                Wiley
                1052-9284
                1099-1298
                January 2025
                December 05 2024
                January 2025
                : 35
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychosocial Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway
                [2 ] Department of Philosophy, Berlin School of Mind and Brain Humboldt‐Universität Zu Berlin Berlin Germany
                Article
                10.1002/casp.70027
                94d910f6-42c4-4ba9-9f62-992dc0419927
                © 2025

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article