20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The experiences of homecare workers in navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for a qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Globally, there have been over 400 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19), including over 6 million deaths, reported to the World Health Organization. Older adults have been disproportionally affected by COVID-19 in terms of morbidity and mortality. Homecare workers continue to play a key role in supporting vulnerable people to live in their own homes. Unlike other health professionals, whose interactions with patients are relatively brief, homecare workers sometimes spend hours with clients assisting with caregiving and functional tasks. In addition, these workers frequently provide companionship and emotional support. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in many challenges to this caregiving role given the risk of virus transmission to both clients and homecare workers in the community. Despite the vital role homecare workers have played, qualitative research exploring perspectives of homecare workers experiences’ of providing help and care to older adults during the pandemic is sparse. This study aims to explore the experiences of homecare workers in navigating the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Methods: A qualitative interpretative approach will be applied in this study through the facilitation of focus groups with homecare workers. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) guidelines will be used to standardise the conduct and reporting of the research. Homecare workers will be recruited from a provider of homecare services in the Mid-West of Ireland (Clarecare) by a gatekeeper. Focus groups will be transcribed and analysed using a reflexive thematic approach supported by the use of NVIVO software package (Version 12).

          Conclusion: This study represents a necessary first step in the development of an evidence base for clinical, education, and support needs of homecare workers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Original Draft Preparation
                Role: Resources
                Role: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Original Draft Preparation
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – Original Draft Preparation
                Journal
                HRB Open Res
                HRB Open Res
                HRB Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2515-4826
                7 June 2022
                2022
                : 5
                : 43
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
                [2 ]Clarecare, Ennis, Co Clare, V95F8CN, Ireland
                [3 ]Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
                [4 ]Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
                [1 ]School of Geography, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
                [1 ]Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-5212
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-9857
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-327X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0218-5390
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8171-224X
                Article
                10.12688/hrbopenres.13561.1
                10444994
                6660f77c-56c6-41c4-a650-efa2b5ee07da
                Copyright: © 2022 Moynan E et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 May 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Irish Research Council New Foundations grant programme
                Award ID: NF/2021/27037738
                This project is supported by a grant from the Irish Research Council New Foundations grant programme (grant number NF/2021/27037738). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Articles

                homecare workers,covid–19 pandemic,experiences,qualitative.

                Comments

                Comment on this article