6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ezh2 Regulates Activation-Induced CD8 + T Cell Cycle Progression via Repressing Cdkn2a and Cdkn1c Expression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Transition from resting to cell cycle in response to antigenic stimulation is an essential step for naïve CD8 + T cells to differentiate to effector and memory cells. Leaving the resting state requires dramatic changes of chromatin status in the key cell cycle inhibitors but the details of these concerted events are not fully elucidated. Here, we showed that Ezh2, an enzymatic component of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) catalyzing the trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3), regulates activation induced naïve CD8 + T cells proliferation and apoptosis. Upon deletion of Ezh2 during thymocyte development (Ezh2 fl/flCd4Cre + mice), naive CD8 + T cells displayed impaired proliferation and increased apoptosis in response to antigen stimulation. However, naive CD8 + T cells only had impaired proliferation but no increase in apoptosis when Ezh2 was deleted after activation (Ezh2 fl/flGzmBCre + mice), suggesting cell cycle and apoptosis are temporally separable events controlled by Ezh2. We then showed that deletion of Ezh2 resulted in the increase in expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors Cdkn2a (p16 and Arf) and Cdkn1c (p57) in activated naïve CD8 + T cells as the consequence of reduced levels of H3K27me3 at these two gene loci. Finally, with real time imaging, we observed prolonged cell division times of naïve CD8 + T cells in the absence of Ezh2 post in vitro stimulation. Together, these findings reveal that repression of Cdkn1c and Cdkn2a by Ezh2 plays a critical role in execution of activation-induced CD8 + T cell proliferation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Immunological memory and protective immunity: understanding their relation.

          The immune system can remember, sometimes for a lifetime, the identity of a pathogen. Understanding how this is accomplished has fascinated immunologists and microbiologists for many years, but there is still considerable debate regarding the mechanisms by which long-term immunity is maintained. Some of the controversy stems from a failure to distinguish between effector and memory cells and to define their roles in conferring protection against disease. Here the current understanding of the cellular basis of immune memory is reviewed and the relative contributions made to protective immunity by memory and effector T and B cells are examined.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ezh2 orchestrates gene expression for the stepwise differentiation of tissue-specific stem cells.

            Although in vitro studies of embryonic stem cells have identified polycomb repressor complexes (PRCs) as key regulators of differentiation, it remains unclear as to how PRC-mediated mechanisms control fates of multipotent progenitors in developing tissues. Here, we show that an essential PRC component, Ezh2, is expressed in epidermal progenitors but diminishes concomitant with embryonic differentiation and with postnatal decline in proliferative activity. We show that Ezh2 controls proliferative potential of basal progenitors by repressing the Ink4A-Ink4B locus and tempers the developmental rate of differentiation by preventing premature recruitment of AP1 transcriptional activator to the structural genes that are required for epidermal differentiation. Together, our studies reveal that PRCs control epigenetic modifications temporally and spatially in tissue-restricted stem cells. They maintain their proliferative potential and globally repressing undesirable differentiation programs while selectively establishing a specific terminal differentiation program in a stepwise fashion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Loss of p16Ink4a with retention of p19Arf predisposes mice to tumorigenesis.

              The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a can induce senescence of human cells, and its loss by deletion, mutation or epigenetic silencing is among the most frequently observed molecular lesions in human cancer. Overlapping reading frames in the INK4A/ARF gene encode p16INK4a and a distinct tumour-suppressor protein, p19ARF (ref. 3). Here we describe the generation and characterization of a p16Ink4a-specific knockout mouse that retains normal p19Arf function. Mice lacking p16Ink4a were born with the expected mendelian distribution and exhibited normal development except for thymic hyperplasia. T cells deficient in p16Ink4a exhibited enhanced mitogenic responsiveness, consistent with the established role of p16Ink4a in constraining cellular proliferation. In contrast to mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) deficient in p19Arf (ref. 4), p16Ink4a-null MEFs possessed normal growth characteristics and remained susceptible to Ras-induced senescence. Compared with wild-type MEFs, p16Ink4a-null MEFs exhibited an increased rate of immortalization, although this rate was less than that observed previously for cells null for Ink4a/Arf, p19Arf or p53 (refs 4, 5). Furthermore, p16Ink4a deficiency was associated with an increased incidence of spontaneous and carcinogen-induced cancers. These data establish that p16Ink4a, along with p19Arf, functions as a tumour suppressor in mice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                26 March 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 549
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Lymphocyte Differentiation Section, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, National Institute on Aging (NIH) , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [2] 2Transcription Systems Dynamics and Biology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, National Institute on Aging (NIH) , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [3] 3Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging (NIH) , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [4] 4Flow Cytometry Unit, National Institute on Aging (NIH) , Baltimore, MD, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Wanjun Chen, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIH), United States

                Reviewed by: Jinfang Zhu, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH), United States; Karsten Sauer, Pfizer, United States

                *Correspondence: Nan-ping Weng, wengn@ 123456mail.nih.gov

                Present address: Guobing Chen, Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to T Cell Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2018.00549
                5879148
                29632530
                93ffec02-de98-473e-9f9f-1096b9268766
                Copyright © 2018 Chen, Subedi, Chakraborty, Sharov, Lu, Kim, Mi, Wersto, Sung and Weng.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 November 2017
                : 05 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 34, Pages: 15, Words: 8957
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging 10.13039/100000049
                Categories
                Immunology
                Original Research

                Immunology
                ezh2,cd8+ t cells,cell cycle,cdkn2a,cdkn1c
                Immunology
                ezh2, cd8+ t cells, cell cycle, cdkn2a, cdkn1c

                Comments

                Comment on this article