Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Regeneration mechanisms in Syllidae (Annelida)

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Syllidae is one of the most species‐rich groups within Annelida, with a wide variety of reproductive modes and different regenerative processes. Syllids have striking ability to regenerate their body anteriorly and posteriorly, which in many species is redeployed during sexual (schizogamy) and asexual (fission) reproduction. This review summarizes the available data on regeneration in syllids, covering descriptions of regenerative mechanisms in different species as well as regeneration in relation to reproductive modes. Our survey shows that posterior regeneration is widely distributed in syllids, whereas anterior regeneration is limited in most of the species, excepting those reproducing by fission. The latter reproductive mode is well known for a few species belonging to Autolytinae, Eusyllinae, and Syllinae. Patterns of fission areas have been studied in these animals. Deviations of the regular regeneration pattern or aberrant forms such as bifurcated animals or individuals with multiple heads have been reported for several species. Some of these aberrations show a deviation of the bilateral symmetry and antero‐posterior axis, which, interestingly, can also be observed in the regular branching body pattern of some species of syllids.

          Related collections

          Most cited references123

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: RNAi, TALEN, or CRISPR.

          The most widely used approach for defining gene function is to reduce or completely disrupt its normal expression. For over a decade, RNAi has ruled the lab, offering a magic bullet to disrupt gene expression in many organisms. However, new biotechnological tools--specifically CRISPR-based technologies--have become available and are squeezing out RNAi dominance in mammalian cell studies. These seemingly competing technologies leave research investigators with the question: "Which technology should I use in my experiment?" This review offers a practical resource to compare and contrast these technologies, guiding the investigator when and where to use this fantastic array of powerful tools.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field.

            Regeneration, the replacement of lost body parts, is widespread yet highly variable among animals. Explaining this variation remains a major challenge in biology. Great strides have been made in understanding the phylogenetic distribution, ecological context and developmental basis of regeneration, and these new data are yielding novel insights into why and how regeneration evolves. Here, we review the phylogenetic distribution of regeneration and discuss how the origin, maintenance and loss of regeneration can each be driven by distinct factors. As the complexity of factors affecting regeneration evolution is increasingly appreciated, and as explicitly evolutionary studies of regeneration become more common, the coming years promise exciting progress in revealing the underlying mechanisms that have shaped animal regeneration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models.

              Significant progress has recently been made in our understanding of animal regenerative biology, spurred on by the use of a wider range of model organisms and an increasing ability to use genetic tools in traditional models of regeneration. This progress has begun to delineate differences and similarities in the regenerative capabilities and mechanisms among diverse animal species, and to address some of the key questions about the molecular and cell biology of regeneration. Our expanding knowledge in these areas not only provides insights into animal biology in general, but also has important implications for regenerative medicine and stem-cell biology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                christoph.bleidorn@gmail.com
                maite.aguado@uam.es
                Journal
                Regeneration (Oxf)
                Regeneration (Oxf)
                10.1002/(ISSN)2052-4412
                REG2
                Regeneration
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2052-4412
                14 April 2018
                March 2018
                : 5
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/reg2.2018.5.issue-1 )
                : 26-42
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Departamento de Biología Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Cantoblanco 28049 Madrid Spain
                [ 2 ] Animal Evolution and Biodiversity Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen 37073 Göttingen Germany
                [ 3 ] German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig 04103 Leipzig Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Christoph Bleidorn, Animal Evolution and Biodiversity, Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Niedersachsen, Germany.

                Email: christoph.bleidorn@ 123456gmail.com

                M. Teresa Aguado, epartamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias,Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain.

                Email: maite.aguado@ 123456uam.es

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-6616
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5583-7516
                Article
                REG298
                10.1002/reg2.98
                5911452
                29721325
                932c1902-ac1d-4f75-bd58-65b23f532773
                © 2018 The Authors. Regeneration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 December 2017
                : 26 February 2018
                : 27 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 2, Pages: 17, Words: 11156
                Funding
                Funded by: MINECO/FEDER
                Award ID: CGL2015-63593-P
                Funded by: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
                Funded by: German Research Foundation
                Funded by: Göttingen University
                Categories
                Review
                Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                reg298
                March 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.4 mode:remove_FC converted:22.04.2018

                annelid,epimorphosis,fission,morphallaxis,schizogamy
                annelid, epimorphosis, fission, morphallaxis, schizogamy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content252

                Cited by16

                Most referenced authors315