2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of State Alcohol Policies With Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities Among US Adults

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e364">Question</h5> <p id="d3648364e366">Are alcohol-related motor vehicle crash fatalities less likely in states with more restrictive alcohol policy environments? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e369">Findings</h5> <p id="d3648364e371">This repeated cross-sectional study examined the association between an aggregate measure of state alcohol policies and 505 614 adult motor vehicle crash fatalities in the United States from 2000 to 2015. A 10–percentage point increase in the restrictiveness of the state alcohol policy environment was associated with a 10% reduced odds that a crash fatality was alcohol related; policies were similarly protective for alcohol involvement at blood alcohol levels below 0.08% (the current legal limit in the United States). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e374">Meaning</h5> <p id="d3648364e376">Strengthening alcohol policies could reduce alcohol-related crash fatalities.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e380">Importance</h5> <p id="d3648364e382">Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of mortality. However, the association between the restrictiveness of the alcohol policy environment (ie, based on multiple existing policies) and alcohol-related crash fatalities has not been characterized previously to date. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e385">Objective</h5> <p id="d3648364e387">To examine the association between the restrictiveness of state alcohol policy environments and the likelihood of alcohol involvement among those dying in motor vehicle crashes in the United States. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e390">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d3648364e392">This investigation was a repeated cross-sectional study in which state alcohol policies (operationalized by the Alcohol Policy Scale [APS]) from 1999 to 2014 were related to motor vehicle crash fatalities from 2000 to 2015 using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (1-year lag). Alternating logistic regression models and generalized estimating equations were used to account for clustering of multiple deaths within a crash and of multiple crashes occurring within states. The study also examined independent associations of mutually exclusive subgroups of policies, including consumption-oriented policies vs driving-oriented policies. The study setting was the 50 US states. Participants were 505 614 decedents aged at least 21 years from motor vehicle crashes from 2000 to 2015. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e395">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d3648364e397">Odds that a crash fatality was alcohol related (fatality stemmed from a crash in which ≥1 driver had a blood alcohol concentration [BAC] ≥0.08%). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e400">Results</h5> <p id="d3648364e402">From 2000 to 2015, there were 505 614 adult motor vehicle crash fatalities in the United States, of which 178 795 (35.4%) were alcohol related. Each 10–percentage point increase in the APS score (corresponding to more restrictive state policies) was associated with reduced individual-level odds of alcohol involvement in a crash fatality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.91); results were consistent among most demographic and crash-type strata. More restrictive policies also had protective associations with alcohol involvement among crash fatalities associated with BACs from greater than 0.00% to less than 0.08%. After accounting for driving-oriented policies, consumption-oriented policies were independently protective for alcohol-related crash fatalities (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.98 based on a 10–percentage point increased APS score). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-ioi180026-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3648364e405">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d3648364e407">Strengthening alcohol policies, including those that do not specifically target impaired driving, could reduce alcohol-related crash fatalities. Policies may also protect against crash fatalities involving BAC levels below the current legal limit for driving in the United States. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d3648364e410">This repeated cross-sectional study examines the association between the restrictiveness of state alcohol policies with the likelihood of alcohol involvement among adults dying in motor vehicle crashes in the United States. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review.

          We systematically reviewed the effects of alcohol taxes and prices on alcohol-related morbidity and mortality to assess their public health impact. We searched 12 databases, along with articles' reference lists, for studies providing estimates of the relationship between alcohol taxes and prices and measures of risky behavior or morbidity and mortality, then coded for effect sizes and numerous population and study characteristics. We combined independent estimates in random-effects models to obtain aggregate effect estimates. We identified 50 articles, containing 340 estimates. Meta-estimates were r = -0.347 for alcohol-related disease and injury outcomes, -0.022 for violence, -0.048 for suicide, -0.112 for traffic crash outcomes, -0.055 for sexually transmitted diseases, -0.022 for other drug use, and -0.014 for crime and other misbehavior measures. All except suicide were statistically significant. Public policies affecting the price of alcoholic beverages have significant effects on alcohol-related disease and injury rates. Our results suggest that doubling the alcohol tax would reduce alcohol-related mortality by an average of 35%, traffic crash deaths by 11%, sexually transmitted disease by 6%, violence by 2%, and crime by 1.4%.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets: impacts on alcohol consumption and damage: a systematic review.

            The aim of this study was to examine recent research studies published from 2000 to 2008 focusing on availability of alcohol: hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets. Systematic review. Forty-four studies on density of alcohol outlets and 15 studies on hours and days of sale were identified through a systematic literature search. The majority of studies reviewed found that alcohol outlet density and hours and days of sale had an impact on one or more of the three main outcome variables, such as overall alcohol consumption, drinking patterns and damage from alcohol. Restricting availability of alcohol is an effective measure to prevent alcohol-attributable harm.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000.

              The goal of this article is to review critically the extant minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) research literature and summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of this policy. Comprehensive searches of four databases were conducted to identify empirical studies of the MLDA published from 1960 to 1999. Three variables were coded for each study regarding methodological quality: (1) sampling design, (2) study design and (3) presence or absence of comparison group. We identified 241 empirical analyses of the MLDA. Fifty-six percent of the analyses met our criteria for high methodological quality. Of the 33 higher quality studies of MLDA and alcohol consumption, 11 (33%) found an inverse relationship; only 1 found the opposite. Similarly, of the 79 higher quality analyses of MLDA and traffic crashes, 46 (58%) found a higher MLDA related to decreased traffic crashes; none found the opposite. Eight of the 23 analyses of other problems found a higher MLDA associated with reduced problems; none found the opposite. Only 6 of the 64 college-specific studies (9%) were of high quality; none found a significant relationship between the MLDA and outcome measures. The preponderance of evidence indicates there is an inverse relationship between the MLDA and two outcome measures: alcohol consumption and traffic crashes. The quality of the studies of specific populations such as college students is poor, preventing any conclusions that the effects of MLDA might differ for such special populations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Internal Medicine
                JAMA Intern Med
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6106
                July 01 2018
                July 01 2018
                : 178
                : 7
                : 894
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                [4 ]Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta
                [5 ]Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland
                [6 ]Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                Article
                10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1406
                6145714
                29813162
                929f0e95-98b4-450b-b5e7-b65ea06cb613
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article