Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      China’s role as a global health donor in Africa: what can we learn from studying under reported resource flows?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is a growing recognition of China’s role as a global health donor, in particular in Africa, but there have been few systematic studies of the level, destination, trends, or composition of these development finance flows or a comparison of China’s engagement as a donor with that of more traditional global health donors.

          Methods

          Using newly released data from AidData on China’s development finance activities in Africa, developed to track under reported resource flows, we identified 255 health, population, water, and sanitation (HPWS) projects from 2000–2012, which we descriptively analyze by activity sector, recipient country, project type, and planned activity. We compare China’s activities to projects from traditional donors using data from the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Creditor Reporting System.

          Results

          Since 2000, China increased the number of HPWS projects it supported in Africa and health has increased as a development priority for China. China’s contributions are large, ranking it among the top 10 bilateral global health donors to Africa. Over 50% of the HPWS projects target infrastructure, 40% target human resource development, and the provision of equipment and drugs is also common. Malaria is an important disease priority but HIV is not. We find little evidence that China targets health aid preferentially to natural resource rich countries.

          Conclusions

          China is an important global health donor to Africa but contrasts with traditional DAC donors through China’s focus on health system inputs and on malaria. Although better data are needed, particularly through more transparent aid data reporting across ministries and agencies, China’s approach to South-South cooperation represents an important and distinct source of financial assistance for health in Africa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Aid ‘With Chinese Characteristics’: Chinese Foreign Aid and Development Finance Meet the OECD-DAC Aid Regime

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            China's distinctive engagement in global health

            Summary China has made rapid progress in four key domains of global health. China's health aid deploys medical teams, constructs facilities, donates drugs and equipment, trains personnel, and supports malaria control mainly in Africa and Asia. Prompted by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003, China has prioritised the control of cross-border transmission of infectious diseases and other health-related risks. In governance, China has joined UN and related international bodies and has begun to contribute to pooled multilateral funds. China is both a knowledge producer and sharer, offering lessons based on its health accomplishments, traditional Chinese medicine, and research and development investment in drug discovery. Global health capacity is being developed in medical universities in China, which also train foreign medical students. China's approach to global health is distinctive; different from other countries; and based on its unique history, comparative strength, and policies driven by several governmental ministries. The scope and depth of China's global engagement are likely to grow and reshape the contours of global health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              HIV donor funding has both boosted and curbed the delivery of different non-HIV health services in sub-Saharan Africa.

              Donor funding for HIV programs has increased rapidly over the past decade, raising questions about whether other health services in recipient-country health systems are being crowded out or strengthened. This article--an investigation of the impacts of increased HIV donor funding on non-HIV health services in sub-Saharan Africa during 2003-10--provides evidence of both effects. HIV aid in some countries has crowded out the delivery of childhood immunizations, especially in countries with the lowest density of health care providers. At the same time, HIV aid may have positively affected some maternal health services, such as prenatal blood testing. These mixed results suggest that donors should be more attentive to domestic resource constraints, such as limited numbers of health workers; should integrate more fully with existing health systems; and should address these constraints up front to limit possible negative effects on the delivery of other health services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kag12@nyu.edu
                vfan@hawaii.edu
                gordon.shen@yale.edu
                lucy_chen@bjmu.edu.cn
                Journal
                Global Health
                Global Health
                Globalization and Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1744-8603
                30 December 2014
                30 December 2014
                2014
                : 10
                : 1
                : 84
                Affiliations
                [ ]Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, 295 Lafayette Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY USA
                [ ]Center for Global Development, 2055 L St NW, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20037 USA
                [ ]University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1960 East–West Road, Biomed D204, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
                [ ]School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, P.O. Box 208034, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
                [ ]Institute for Global Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
                Article
                84
                10.1186/s12992-014-0084-6
                4298065
                25547314
                929737c4-76ab-4a49-9ebc-bfce8afc3635
                © Grépin et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 August 2014
                : 25 November 2014
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Health & Social care
                china,africa,south-south cooperation,development assistance for health,foreign aid,politics,health systems,malaria,human resources for health

                Comments

                Comment on this article